Category Archives: Drug or alcohol testing

IA: SW for taking blood includes testing it

The search warrant authorized taking defendant’s blood so it impliedly permitted testing it as well. The expectation of privacy is already reduced by the blood draw by authorization of law. State v. Frescoln, 2017 Iowa App. LEXIS 1227 (Dec. 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IA: SW for taking blood includes testing it

AlterNet: Wisconsin Governor Walker’s Plan to Drug Test Food Stamp Applicants Would Be Wasteful, Ineffective and Perhaps Unconstitutional

AlterNet: Wisconsin Governor Walker’s Plan to Drug Test Food Stamp Applicants Would Be Wasteful, Ineffective and Perhaps Unconstitutional by Widney Brown It’s yet another attempt to stigmatize and criminalize people living in poverty.

Posted in Administrative search, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on AlterNet: Wisconsin Governor Walker’s Plan to Drug Test Food Stamp Applicants Would Be Wasteful, Ineffective and Perhaps Unconstitutional

IL: ER blood draw was private search for diagnostic purposes

“The mere filing of a motion [to suppress] is not proof that a search occurred.” Defendant first failed to prove that he was the subject of the search. Second, even if it was assumed, the hospital took the blood draw … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Private search | Comments Off on IL: ER blood draw was private search for diagnostic purposes

Michigan Daily: Libertarians protest roadside drug-testing program

Stunning, the chutzpa of the Michigan State Police: Michigan Daily: Libertarians protest roadside drug-testing program by Leah Graham:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Roadblocks | Comments Off on Michigan Daily: Libertarians protest roadside drug-testing program

OR: Exigency-based entry into house for DUI arrest requires proof of exigency, and here it was lacking

Here the officer entered defendant’s home in a DUI case to seize him for evidence of his intoxication. Exigency can permit an entry, but the state has the burden of proof on exigency, and here it failed to prove the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OR: Exigency-based entry into house for DUI arrest requires proof of exigency, and here it was lacking

TX13: If a motion to suppress was made under McNeely it would have been granted; def received IAC

Defense counsel’s misapprehension of the application of McNeely to blood test results was ineffective assistance of counsel. If a motion to suppress had been made, it would have been granted. Briggs v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 10891 (Tex. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on TX13: If a motion to suppress was made under McNeely it would have been granted; def received IAC

GA: Def not compelled to perform breath tests, so no self-incrimination issue

Defendant was not compelled to perform breath tests, so the Fifth Amendment’s self-incrimination clause did not apply. State v. Council, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 531 (Oct. 30, 2017).* In a Franks challenge, “The Court is tasked with reassessing the probable … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on GA: Def not compelled to perform breath tests, so no self-incrimination issue

OH5: Def’s refusal to stop digging in pockets during traffic stop was RS for frisk

Defendant’s erratic behavior during a stop was reasonable suspicion when he also refused to stop digging around in his pockets. State v. Imani, 2017-Ohio-8113, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 4469 (5th Dist. Oct. 5, 2017). The trial court did not err … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s refusal to stop digging in pockets during traffic stop was RS for frisk

NM: Def raised the Birchfield issue in trial court, and it applied even though case not decided until on appellate review

Birchfield applied to a case on appeal where defendant raised the issue at trial and Birchfeild came down during appellate review. State v. Vargas, 2017 N.M. LEXIS 71 (Oct. 5, 2017). When defendant was told to “take a seat” in … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Def raised the Birchfield issue in trial court, and it applied even though case not decided until on appellate review

Marianas Variety: AG says random drug tests in GovGuam forbidden, with some exemptions

After seeing at least a half dozen news articles on this, finally I’ll post something while Guam still exists: Marianas Variety: AG says random drug tests in GovGuam forbidden, with some exemptions:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Marianas Variety: AG says random drug tests in GovGuam forbidden, with some exemptions

WA: Periodic pretrial urine testing for DUI violated state constitution

The conditions of periodic urine testing imposed on the defendants as a condition of pretrial release for DUI were invalid under the state constitution because the defendants did not suffer a diminution in their privacy interests sufficient to justify the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Periodic pretrial urine testing for DUI violated state constitution

NM: “Birchfield does not prohibit the introduction of evidence of, and commentary on, evidence establishing a defendant’s refusal to take a blood test.”

“Birchfield does not prohibit the introduction of evidence of, and commentary on, evidence establishing a defendant’s refusal to take a blood test.” State v. Storey, 2017 N.M. App. LEXIS 75 (Sept. 28, 2017):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on NM: “Birchfield does not prohibit the introduction of evidence of, and commentary on, evidence establishing a defendant’s refusal to take a blood test.”

NY4: Drug testing condition of probation unenforceable without showing def needs it

Defendant’s drug testing condition of probation is unenforceable because there were no findings of drug or alcohol abuse in his past to justify it. People v. Saraceni, 2017 NY Slip Op 06732, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6746 (4th Dept. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY4: Drug testing condition of probation unenforceable without showing def needs it

NE: Birchfield was decided day after def’s DUI conviction; GFE applies

Defendant was convicted of DUI the day before Birchfield was decided, and he moved for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion, and he appeals. The good faith exception applies to that which happened before Birchfield (without even … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on NE: Birchfield was decided day after def’s DUI conviction; GFE applies

MI: Consent to draw blood includes consent to test it

Defendant consented to a draw of blood for testing, and a separate warrant isn’t required for testing under the Fourth Amendment. The collection and testing of blood are “a single event for fourth amendment purposes.” United States v. Snyder, 852 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on MI: Consent to draw blood includes consent to test it

Natl.L.Rev.: The Utah Blood Draw Story: Drawing Unwarranted Conclusions

Natl.L.Rev.: The Utah Blood Draw Story: Drawing Unwarranted Conclusions by David J. Edquist & Aaron M. Smith:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force, Police misconduct | Comments Off on Natl.L.Rev.: The Utah Blood Draw Story: Drawing Unwarranted Conclusions

A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Retest of inconclusive UA was reasonable

The military judge erred in suppressing the results of a second “reinspection” UA administered as a base protocol after a first UA after an AWOL come up positive, diluted, or inconclusive. It was a reasonable command imposed requirement. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Military searches, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Retest of inconclusive UA was reasonable

OH5: SW needed to obtain blood results from hospital’s blood draw

Defendant’s blood draw in the hospital was for medical purposes, and a search warrant was required to get access to that information. Trial court affirmed. State v. Saunders, 2017-Ohio-7348, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 3640 (5th Dist. Aug. 23, 2017). Playpen … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on OH5: SW needed to obtain blood results from hospital’s blood draw

Wisconsin Public Radio: Wisconsin Department Of Health Services Gets Input On Drug Testing For Food Stamp Applicants

Wisconsin Public Radio: Wisconsin Department Of Health Services Gets Input On Drug Testing For Food Stamp Applicants by Patty Murray: In the last budget, the state Legislature approved a measure requiring able-bodied adults with no dependents to be screened for … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Wisconsin Public Radio: Wisconsin Department Of Health Services Gets Input On Drug Testing For Food Stamp Applicants

KS: Delay from police and EMS attending rural motorcycle accident was exigency to dispense with BAC warrant

The state showed probable cause for DUI and exigency to dispense with a warrant. Defendant crashed his motorcycle in a park parking lot, and the bike hit a pedestrian. The officer arrived more than 10 minutes after it happened was … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on KS: Delay from police and EMS attending rural motorcycle accident was exigency to dispense with BAC warrant