Category Archives: Plain view, feel, smell

OH9: Medical records allegedly unlawfully seized weren’t in appellate record, so prejudice couldn’t be determined; held waived

Defendant claimed his medical records were unlawfully seized and admitted at evidence as an admission at this DUI trial. Without them in the appellate record, the appellate court can’t determine prejudice. Thus, this is waived. State v. Miller, 2020-Ohio-1209, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH9: Medical records allegedly unlawfully seized weren’t in appellate record, so prejudice couldn’t be determined; held waived

LA2: Officer’s leaning in open window wasn’t a plain view; def’s demands to know why he’s detained can’t be RS when he has a right to know

Officer’s leaning into the open window of defendant’s car with a flashlight to get a better view was not a plain view. Statute “commands police officers, upon detaining a citizen in connection with the investigation or commission of any offense, … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA2: Officer’s leaning in open window wasn’t a plain view; def’s demands to know why he’s detained can’t be RS when he has a right to know

PA: Syringes in plain view on floorboard was PC

Officer’s seeing syringes on the floor of defendant’s car just by looking was plain view and probable cause for search. Commonwealth v. Bumbarger, 2020 Pa. Super. LEXIS 206 (Mar. 16, 2020).* “Mr. Sealey’s motion to suppress, the court did not … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Syringes in plain view on floorboard was PC

D.N.M.: Search of camper being lived in parked on the street in violation of ordinance was inevitable

The question of standing and alleged illegal search of defendant’s camper were moot. The camper was parked on an Albuquerque city street where it’s illegal to live in a camper. Given those facts, the camper would have otherwise been inventoried, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Search of camper being lived in parked on the street in violation of ordinance was inevitable

AL: Officer was lawfully in position for plain view of def’s computer screen

The trial court erred in suppressing the search here because the officer who did it was a law enforcement officer under state law able to do so. On the merits, the officer was in position to make a plain view … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on AL: Officer was lawfully in position for plain view of def’s computer screen

E.D.Tex.: Address of a building is usually sufficient for particularity

The address of a building is generally sufficient particularity for a search warrant. Even so, the good faith exception would apply. United States v. Wilson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37210 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 17, 2020), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Address of a building is usually sufficient for particularity

E.D.Tex.: Conclusory objections to R&R are denied

Conclusory objections to the R&R on this search issue are overruled. United States v. Wilson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36571 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2020). Feeling a firearm during a patdown is plain feel. United States v. White, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Conclusory objections to R&R are denied

E.D.Mich.: Despite MMJ law, def rolling a joint when stopped could have his car searched

When defendant was stopped, he was seen rolling a joint. Despite the medical marijuana law, the officer could search the car for more because it was still a violation of federal law. United States v. Hinds, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Despite MMJ law, def rolling a joint when stopped could have his car searched

N.D.Ga.: Issues over the territorial jurisdiction of state issuing magistrate for geolocation information was subject to GFE

Defendants’ challenges to the state issuing magistrate’s jurisdiction over geolocation information that crosses jurisdictional lines were based on a Franks challenge that was negligence at worst and not an intentional misrepresentation as to the judge’s jurisdiction. Besides, as interesting as … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Issues over the territorial jurisdiction of state issuing magistrate for geolocation information was subject to GFE

D.Me.: It wasn’t unreasonable for the officer to delay def’s arrest until they moved to where another officer was for safety

It wasn’t unreasonable for the officer to forgo defendant’s arrest and get him to walk with the officer to the house where another officer was waiting. This was for safety purposes. United States v. Brigley, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13938 … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Me.: It wasn’t unreasonable for the officer to delay def’s arrest until they moved to where another officer was for safety

N.D.W.Va.: Traffic stop was valid and led to plain view of drugs on passenger seat

The headings tell us the case: “A. Lieutenant Kennedy had the requisite reasonable, articulable suspicion of unlawful conduct to initiate a traffic stop on Defendant’s vehicle based upon traffic violations and erratic driving consistent with that of an impaired driver.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Traffic stop was valid and led to plain view of drugs on passenger seat

OH11: “Hand swabs” in SW for person fairly includes fingernail scrapings; no REP in clothing removed at ER by nurses

Defendant was brought to a hospital for alleged injuries. He was exceedingly drunk for a juvenile and covered in blood. He was cleaned up at the ER and no injuries found. The nurses there took his clothes. Police later seized … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH11: “Hand swabs” in SW for person fairly includes fingernail scrapings; no REP in clothing removed at ER by nurses

CA6: Game officers had PC to arrest ptf for night hunting with lights despite ptf winning some counts at state trial and state abandoning last one on his promise not to do it anymore

Officers had probable cause to arrest plaintiff for shining deer at night when he was spotted from an airplane on patrol. He was arrested for hunting under the influence and at night. He ultimately got counts dismissed, one for his … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Game officers had PC to arrest ptf for night hunting with lights despite ptf winning some counts at state trial and state abandoning last one on his promise not to do it anymore

The Center Square: Illinois Supreme Court could decide if smell of marijuana is enough to justify police search

The Center Square: Illinois Supreme Court could decide if smell of marijuana is enough to justify police search by Greg Bishop:

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on The Center Square: Illinois Supreme Court could decide if smell of marijuana is enough to justify police search

Two on searches related to impoundments, one from 2001

Defendant is now subject to a RICO prosecution, and he challenges a 2001 traffic stop. “When the investigating officers pulled him over, Banks was driving without a license, an offense under California law. The officers therefore had probable cause to … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on Two on searches related to impoundments, one from 2001

S.C.: Franks violation can support a § 1983 claim

A Franks violation can support a § 1983 claim. Manuel v. City of Joliet, Ill., 137 S. Ct. 911, 919 (2017). Carter v. Bryant, 2020 S.C. App. LEXIS 6 (Jan. 15, 2020). The arresting officers were entitled to qualified immunity … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on S.C.: Franks violation can support a § 1983 claim

VA: Running the serial number of a seized firearm isn’t a “search”

When defendant got out of the car, the officer could see the butt of a gun sticking from his coat pocket, so a frisk was reasonable for officer safety. Looking at the serial number and then running it to see … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on VA: Running the serial number of a seized firearm isn’t a “search”

injusticewatch.org: Illinois Supreme Court to decide whether smell of pot is grounds to search a car

injusticewatch.org: Illinois Supreme Court to decide whether smell of pot is grounds to search a car by John Seasly (“With marijuana now legal in Illinois, the state high court heard arguments Tuesday on whether the smell of marijuana grants police … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on injusticewatch.org: Illinois Supreme Court to decide whether smell of pot is grounds to search a car

E.D.Tenn.: Consent to protective sweep led to plain view of money under a bed

Defendant consented to a protective sweep, and, looking under a bed, the officer saw a duffle bag with money showing. That was a reasonable search. United States v. Stanton, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 778 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 3, 2020).* “To … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Consent to protective sweep led to plain view of money under a bed

CA11: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to revocation of supervised release; SCOTUS would so hold

The exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of supervised release conditions. While SCOTUS hasn’t ruled on that precise question, its parole and probation search cases are a clear sign it will follow them there. United States v. Hill, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA11: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to revocation of supervised release; SCOTUS would so hold