Category Archives: Cell phones

New law review article: The Post-Riley Search Warrant: Search Protocols and Particularity in Cell Phone Searches

Adam M. Gershowitz, The Post-Riley Search Warrant: Search Protocols and Particularity in Cell Phone Searches, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-313. Abstract: Last year, in Riley v. California, the Supreme Court required police to procure a warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on New law review article: The Post-Riley Search Warrant: Search Protocols and Particularity in Cell Phone Searches

TN: Def’s consent to look at cell phone for suicide threat text messages was not violated when officer opened up a folder looking for deleted TMs

The record supports the conclusion that, on the totality, defendant consented to a search of his phone for text messages about a suicide threat. The messages were gone, and the officer went to a folder looking for them and found … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Consent | Comments Off on TN: Def’s consent to look at cell phone for suicide threat text messages was not violated when officer opened up a folder looking for deleted TMs

IN: Car’s GPS device protected under Riley; SW required

A vehicle’s GPS device is not a container subject to search under the automobile exception. It contains personal data, and it is akin to a cell phone, and a warrant is required under Riley. Wertz v. State, 2015 Ind. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on IN: Car’s GPS device protected under Riley; SW required

M.D.Ga.: DNA taken under state law that was potentially purgable still could be used as evidence in a federal prosecution

Defendant was charged as a first offender under Georgia law, and, if he completed probation successfully, his DNA sample would have been purged from the system. Here, the DNA was matched to another crime when he was still on probation. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, DNA | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: DNA taken under state law that was potentially purgable still could be used as evidence in a federal prosecution

AZ: Even def lying about his identity on arrest didn’t justify search incident of cell phone

When defendant was arrested, his cell phone was seized and searched, and it could not be justified as a search incident even though defendant initially lied about his name. State v. Ontiveros-Loya, 2015 Ariz. App. LEXIS 111 (June 30, 2015). … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on AZ: Even def lying about his identity on arrest didn’t justify search incident of cell phone

DE: Def does not waive suppression motion by FTA; hear it without him

Failure to appear for a suppression hearing is not a waiver of the motion. The court should have conducted the hearing in his absence. Smolka v. State, 2015 Del. LEXIS 308 (June 23, 2015). Defendant called 911 about the pregnant … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on DE: Def does not waive suppression motion by FTA; hear it without him

CA2: Obtaining a building permit is an express consent of building inspectors to enter during construction

“McNeice’s [building] permit application provided express consent for town officials to enter and inspect his property in connection with the building laws.” McNeice v. Town of Waterford, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10645 (2d Cir. June 24, 2015). Defendant was staying … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA2: Obtaining a building permit is an express consent of building inspectors to enter during construction

OR: Seizure of cell phone was seizure of the person, but with RS

Seizure of defendant’s cell phone converted the consensual encounter into a stop, but it was with reasonable suspicion. State v. Hayes, 272 Ore. App. 1 (June 24, 2015). The defendant here tried to extrapolate the use of GPS on somebody … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on OR: Seizure of cell phone was seizure of the person, but with RS

DE: SW needed for hospital medical records; subpoena production suppressed

Implicit in prior case law is that a search warrant is required for medical records in Delaware. The state’s obtaining defendant’s by subpoena is suppressed. State v. Robinson, 2015 Del. C.P. LEXIS 32 (May 15, 2015). Defendant consented to entry … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on DE: SW needed for hospital medical records; subpoena production suppressed

CA5: Consent of motorist based on “before you go” was involuntary

The consent was found by the district court to be involuntary because it was based on “before you go”: “Also at the suppression hearing, Spelying testified that as Robertson turned to leave, the officer asked him, ‘before you go, we … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent | Comments Off on CA5: Consent of motorist based on “before you go” was involuntary

techdirt: CA Legislators Pass Warrant Requirement For Phone Searches, Gut Transparency Stipulations To Appease Law Enforcement

techdirt: CA Legislators Pass Warrant Requirement For Phone Searches, Gut Transparency Stipulations To Appease Law Enforcement by Tim Cushing: The California Senate has passed a bill that creates a warrant requirement for searches of cellphones, tablets and electronic devices. This … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on techdirt: CA Legislators Pass Warrant Requirement For Phone Searches, Gut Transparency Stipulations To Appease Law Enforcement

NYLJ: How Has Digital Ubiquity Affected Fourth Amendment Law?

NYLJ: How Has Digital Ubiquity Affected Fourth Amendment Law? by Richard Raysman & Peter Brown:

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYLJ: How Has Digital Ubiquity Affected Fourth Amendment Law?

E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW for cell phones in RICO conspiracy showed PC that phones were used for planning crimes

In a RICO conspiracy case, the affidavit for a search warrant for cell phones to look for evidence of defendant’s using cell phones to plan crimes adequately showed probable cause to believe evidence of their contact would be found on … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW for cell phones in RICO conspiracy showed PC that phones were used for planning crimes

W.D.N.Y.: A cell phone is an “instrumentality” of a drug crime; turning on a cell phone to see if it answers is not a “search”

Defendant’s 12 cell phones could be seized as instrumentalities of a drug crime under a search warrant. Calling a number the officers obtained during a wiretap to identify a phone was not an illegal search. Turning on the phones just … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Cell phones, Qualified immunity, Search | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: A cell phone is an “instrumentality” of a drug crime; turning on a cell phone to see if it answers is not a “search”

M.D.Pa.: Giving cell phone to another for use in drug deals is waiver of reasonable expectation of privacy

Giving one’s cell phone over to another to use for drug dealing was a loss of any reasonable expectation of privacy in it. United States v. Brewer, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62260 (M.D.Pa. May 12, 2015):

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Giving cell phone to another for use in drug deals is waiver of reasonable expectation of privacy

KS statute tracks Chimel on search incident, and cell phone search was unreasonable (even before Riley was decided)

Defendant was stopped for a headlight being out in 2009. He ended up getting arrested and handcuffed for an open container and then possession of marijuana. The officer got his cell phone and scrolled through it asking about drug transactions. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Search incident | Comments Off on KS statute tracks Chimel on search incident, and cell phone search was unreasonable (even before Riley was decided)

TX7: Riley applied to cell phone search incident where it came down between trial and appeal

Search incident cannot support a cell phone search under Riley. Riley came down between trial and appeal, so it applies here because the issue was preserved. Carter v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 4271 (Tex. App. – Amarillo April 27, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on TX7: Riley applied to cell phone search incident where it came down between trial and appeal

ND: Probation search of cell phone permitted even though not specified in probation search statute

North Dakota statute on probation searches says: “Defendant shall submit to search of his person, vehicle, or place of residence by any probation officer at any time of the day or night, with or without a search warrant.” Even though … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on ND: Probation search of cell phone permitted even though not specified in probation search statute

W.D.Ky.: Text messages to 11 year old boy for sex was justification for warrantless seizure of cell phone

The seizure of defendant’s cell phone incident to his arrest was reasonable. Defendant was accused by an 11 year old boy of sexual conduct on Fort Campbell, and the FBI and Army CID investigated and got enough information to have … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Text messages to 11 year old boy for sex was justification for warrantless seizure of cell phone

D.Md.: A cell phone found on a drug dealer is virtually per se probable cause there is evidence to be found on it; it’s a “tool of the trade”

A cell phone found on a drug dealer is virtually per se probable cause there is evidence to be found on it. Thus, there was PC for a warrant and nexus to the crime. United States v. Fisher, 2015 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on D.Md.: A cell phone found on a drug dealer is virtually per se probable cause there is evidence to be found on it; it’s a “tool of the trade”