Category Archives: Informant hearsay

CA6: Exigency supported seizure of animals from pet store, but not its records

Animal control officers seized animals and records from a pet store in Chattanooga for lack of water, food, and proper care. The animal seizure was valid and did not violate any clearly established right. The business record seizure, however, could … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA6: Exigency supported seizure of animals from pet store, but not its records

OH2: Five officer knock-and-talk valid where defendant on porch when consent given

Five officers showed up at defendant’s house for a knock and talk and one went down the alley to check around back there. Defendant had a dog, and, when he came to the door, he was asked to come outside. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Knock and talk | Comments Off on OH2: Five officer knock-and-talk valid where defendant on porch when consent given

E.D.Mich.: Failure to promptly answer PO’s knock at door was RS for an entry, given drug history

Defendant’s failure to answer his door promptly was reasonable cause for a warrantless parole search entry because, given defendant’s drug history, it was reasonable to believe he was destroying drugs. United States v. Sandlain, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129135 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Failure to promptly answer PO’s knock at door was RS for an entry, given drug history

KY: 2 am knock-and-talk based on tip was suppressed where tip quickly proved wrong

2 a.m. knock and talk based on midnight anonymous call about noxious odors from the property was invalid where the officers approaching smelled nothing. “Upon receipt of the anonymous tip, the police had a duty to respond and investigate to … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Knock and talk, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on KY: 2 am knock-and-talk based on tip was suppressed where tip quickly proved wrong

Cal.2: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident expressly authorized by case law so Davis GFE applies

The pre-Riley search of defendant’s cell phone was expressly permitted by California case law at the time of the search, so the good faith exception applies. People v. Macabeo, 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 793 (2d Dist. September 3, 2014). Based … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Cal.2: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident expressly authorized by case law so Davis GFE applies

NJ: Emergency entry valid despite two hour delay attempting to locate victim

The entry into defendant’s home was justified under the emergency aid doctrine on a finding of blood despite a two hour delay where the police were calling hospitals trying to locate the defendant to avoid the entry unless it was … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NJ: Emergency entry valid despite two hour delay attempting to locate victim

WA: 911 call wasn’t reliable enough for a stop; there was reason to question its veracity

Conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm was subject to reversal because police officers had good reasons to question the reliability of the 911 call, any suspicion of an exigent circumstance had dissipated by the time police officers inquired whether … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WA: 911 call wasn’t reliable enough for a stop; there was reason to question its veracity

WA: Defendant was separated from his backpack, so it couldn’t be searched incident to arrest

During a Terry stop, the officer separated defendant from his backpack, and the backpack was searched about 10 minutes later when defendant was placed under arrest. The backpack was thus not on defendant’s person nor within his area of control … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on WA: Defendant was separated from his backpack, so it couldn’t be searched incident to arrest

National Journal: Privacy Groups Sound the Alarm Over FBI’s Facial-Recognition Technology

National Journal: Privacy Groups Sound the Alarm Over FBI’s Facial-Recognition Technology by Dustin Volz: Advocates are pushing Attorney General Eric Holder to assess the privacy impact of the FBI’s controversial database that is expected to become fully operational later this … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on National Journal: Privacy Groups Sound the Alarm Over FBI’s Facial-Recognition Technology

TX4: No reasonable expectation of privacy in public official’s emails

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public office holder’s official email accounts under the state public records act. Quon is distinguished, and the email policies show no expectation of privacy. Adkisson v. Abbott, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX4: No reasonable expectation of privacy in public official’s emails

E.D.Va.: Corroboration of publicly known facts provided by CI here was enough

“The only facts that were independently corroborated by Detective Duquette were: (1) that Dixon lived at the Home, and (2) that he had previously been incarcerated in federal prison for selling illegal drugs and had been released in 2010.” “Here, … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Corroboration of publicly known facts provided by CI here was enough

KS: Failure to corroborate anonymous informants was a complete lack of PC for GFE

A police car was stolen and left in a ditch apparently with blood and hair left on it. Three anonymous calls linked defendant to the theft. He first agreed to come in and give samples and then didn’t show. A … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on KS: Failure to corroborate anonymous informants was a complete lack of PC for GFE

D.C.Cir. finds good faith exception applies to warrant, and probable cause was not even considered

The reliability of the informant’s tale does not need to be decided here because the good faith exception applies [without a word of why]. United States v. Matthews, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10522 (D.C. Cir. June 6, 2014). Defendant in … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.C.Cir. finds good faith exception applies to warrant, and probable cause was not even considered

W.D.Mich.: No standing in an envelope where only connection to it was asking about it

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of an envelope in transit. He didn’t mail it, it wasn’t mailed to him, and he merely asked about it when it was in transit. That wasn’t standing. United States v. Johnson, 2014 … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: No standing in an envelope where only connection to it was asking about it

IL: Information from an attorney for SW affidavit neither more nor less credible

Information from an attorney acting for an affidavit for a search warrant is treated the same as other information; it’s neither more nor less reliable. People v. Brown, 2014 IL App (2d) 121167, 2014 Ill. App. LEXIS 366 (May 30, … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IL: Information from an attorney for SW affidavit neither more nor less credible

KY: Search incident to arrest could precede the arrest

The CI here was getting calls from the defendant about defendant selling him drugs, so he called the police to set him up. He was wired and took marked money. The seizure of the pill bottle off defendant was with … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on KY: Search incident to arrest could precede the arrest