Category Archives: Informant hearsay

OH12: Plain smell came from patdown that squeezed bag of MJ that gave off odor

Plain feel supported seizure of marijuana baggie which gave off an odor when pressed during defendant’s otherwise valid patdown. Plain feel did not support seizure of cash in another pocket. However, it was not suppressed because discovery was inevitable by … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH12: Plain smell came from patdown that squeezed bag of MJ that gave off odor

AR: Anonymous tip def was in a hotel room was insufficient under Payton for entry on arrest warrant

Defendant was wanted for bank robbery, and the police had an arrest warrant. In a case of first impression, an anonymous tip that defendant was in a hotel room was not enough to base an entry on the arrest warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on AR: Anonymous tip def was in a hotel room was insufficient under Payton for entry on arrest warrant

MO: PC lacking and SW was stale, but GFE exception saves it anyway

The affidavit for the search warrant here failed for two reasons. First, it failed to show a substantial basis for finding probable cause from two informants’ information that was not properly corroborated [although later court says they kind of corroborate … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on MO: PC lacking and SW was stale, but GFE exception saves it anyway

OH: Single trash pull that corroborated CI’s story was PC

“Using the totality-of-the-circumstances test in this case, we hold that the evidence seized from a single trash pull that corroborates tips and background information involving drug activity is sufficient to establish probable cause for a warrant.” State v. Jones, 2015-Ohio-483, … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH: Single trash pull that corroborated CI’s story was PC

NV: Holding a pedestrian’s ID too long became an illegal detention; checking warrants became unreasonable

Holding a pedestrian’s ID too long constitutes an unreasonable seizure. Here, the officer promptly dispelled any reason for the stop, but holding on to the ID extended the stop. Then he sought warrants on the defendant, finding one, and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NV: Holding a pedestrian’s ID too long became an illegal detention; checking warrants became unreasonable

CA8: Stop of the wrong person on reasonable but mistaken belief not suppressed

Based on an informant’s story, the police were looking for Barefield in a particular car. They happened upon defendant Patrick at the appointed time and place near the informant in a car matching the description. A reasonable but mistaken belief … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Stop of the wrong person on reasonable but mistaken belief not suppressed

CA6: Def deferred consent to his mother, and her’s was voluntary

Defendant deferred the question to consent to search his place to his mother with whom he lived. She validly and promptly consented to the officers’ request, and it was all voluntary. United States v. Gossett, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 417, … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Def deferred consent to his mother, and her’s was voluntary

DE: Failure to corroborate the CI’s tale was fatal to showing of probable cause; corroborating obvious no help

Failure to corroborate the CI’s tale was fatal to the attempted showing of probable cause. Verifying the obvious isn’t much help. McKinney v. State, 2014 Del. LEXIS 601 (December 18, 2014):

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on DE: Failure to corroborate the CI’s tale was fatal to showing of probable cause; corroborating obvious no help

CA5: Independent source doctrine saved SW from findings during protective sweep

The government satisfied its burden on the independent source doctrine without a remand being necessary. The entry was a protective sweep for weapons and the search warrant affidavit didn’t contain anything from that entry. Also, the district court’s order found … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA5: Independent source doctrine saved SW from findings during protective sweep

NC: Anonymous informant hearsay and officer’s conclusions not PC

The CI in this case provided information that defendant had a grow operation, and the police did little to corroborate any of that. Accordingly, the CI was treated as an anonymous informant, and his information was unsubstantiated. Sure the defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NC: Anonymous informant hearsay and officer’s conclusions not PC

S.D.N.Y.: No GFE where SW issued on bare conclusion of officer and CI

Here, the approval of the search warrant was mere ratification of the conclusion of the officer, so there was no probable cause and no good faith exception. United States v. Rutherford, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166917 (S.D. N.Y. December 2, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No GFE where SW issued on bare conclusion of officer and CI

E.D.Va.: IAC claim for illegal search denied because it lacked specifics

“‘Ellis submits that some of the evidence seized were [sic] so done in violation of his Fourth Amendment right[s] against unreasonable search and seizure.’ (Mem. Supp. § 2255 Mot. 6-7.) Ellis supplies no basis upon which counsel could have filed … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: IAC claim for illegal search denied because it lacked specifics

AR: Locked safe in car could be searched without warrant under automobile exception

Where the automobile exception applies to a car, the state does not need a search warrant to search a locked safe found in it. State v. Crane, 2014 Ark. 443, 2014 Ark. LEXIS 586 (October 30, 2014). The government did … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on AR: Locked safe in car could be searched without warrant under automobile exception

Cal.1st: Davis good faith exception applied to a pre-McNeely DUI warrantless blood draw

Davis good faith exception applied to a pre-McNeely DUI warrantless blood draw. People v. Rossetti, 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 950 (1st Dist. October 22, 2014). 911 call from a name eyewitness to shots fired did not need corroboration. “In general, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Forfeiture, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Cal.1st: Davis good faith exception applied to a pre-McNeely DUI warrantless blood draw

MS implicitly rejects Navarette: uncorroborated anonymous tip is not enough to support a stop

An uncorroborated anonymous tip is not enough to support a stop, and defendant’s DUI conviction is reversed and dismissed. (The majority does not cite or explain away Navarette but the dissent does address it. The opinion attempts to rely on … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MS implicitly rejects Navarette: uncorroborated anonymous tip is not enough to support a stop

HuffPo: “SWAT Team Shot David Hooks At Home After Tip From Meth Addict”; no drugs

Why do we have an informant hearsay rule? Because of things like this: HuffPo: SWAT Team Shot David Hooks At Home After Tip From Meth Addict by Michael McLaughlin:

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on HuffPo: “SWAT Team Shot David Hooks At Home After Tip From Meth Addict”; no drugs

TN: One controlled buy 3 days ago without ID’g source person was not PC to search; could have been a visitor

A CI’s statement that a controlled buy occurred out of defendant’s apartment failed to show probable cause where there was no connection to the sale and the owner or tenant shown. It could have been a mere visitor. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TN: One controlled buy 3 days ago without ID’g source person was not PC to search; could have been a visitor

TN: Named eyewitness to shooting was not a “CI” needing corroboration

The “CI” in this homicide case was a known eyewitness who knew the defendant. He was a citizen informant, not a mere snitch, and his version had a presumption of reliability. State v. Dotson, 2014 Tenn. LEXIS 694 (September 30, … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on TN: Named eyewitness to shooting was not a “CI” needing corroboration

E.D.Va.: “Courts have been clear that police need not corroborate information given by known informants.”

“Courts have been clear that police need not corroborate information given by known informants. Like the CI in Harris, the CI in this case was known to provide reliable information that led to arrests. Thus, police corroboration was unnecessary. But … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Private search, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: “Courts have been clear that police need not corroborate information given by known informants.”

GA: The mere presence of some papers of the defendant in the place searched doesn’t confer standing

The mere presence of some papers of the defendant in the place searched doesn’t confer standing. There was no testimony that he was otherwise connected to the property as owner, lessee, or guest. “The mere presence of miscellaneous papers bearing … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on GA: The mere presence of some papers of the defendant in the place searched doesn’t confer standing