Category Archives: Informant hearsay

MO: Omission from affidavit that CI was “working off a case” not material–it’s virtually a given

An alleged material omission for Franks purposes was not material because adding it in would essentially be misleading. Telling the issuing magistrate that the CI was “working off a case” isn’t really required under Franks because that’s usually a given … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MO: Omission from affidavit that CI was “working off a case” not material–it’s virtually a given

D.S.D.: Def showed that CI had material information for suppression hearing; disclosure of identity ordered

This CI’s identity was shown to be material for the suppression motion because of his alleged motive to lie. Moreover, the government does not specify that the CI will or will not be called as a witness at trial. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Def showed that CI had material information for suppression hearing; disclosure of identity ordered

N.D.Iowa: Anonymous 911 call wasn’t good enough under Florida v. J.L.

This 911 call that defendant was likely with a gun was more like Florida v. J.L. than Naverette v. California, and it lacked indicia of reliability. While it’s a “close case,” the motion to suppress should be granted. “Nothing in … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Anonymous 911 call wasn’t good enough under Florida v. J.L.

S.D.Fla.: When a cotenant with authority consents, the officers do not have to seek out the “target” for his consent

When a cotenant with authority consents, the officers do not have to seek out the “target” for his consent, too. United States v. Morales, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125085 (S.D.Fla. September 18, 2015), R&R 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125086 (S.D.Fla. … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: When a cotenant with authority consents, the officers do not have to seek out the “target” for his consent

CA9: Vague uncorroborated anonymous tip could not support warrant, which was also overbroad, and the good faith exception cannot apply

Officers received a vague anonymous tip relayed through an apartment manager about a tenant having ten pounds of marijuana. They were able to somehow link it to defendant, and they did a knock-and-talk. Defendant admitted to being a medical marijuana … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA9: Vague uncorroborated anonymous tip could not support warrant, which was also overbroad, and the good faith exception cannot apply

D.S.C.: UnMirandized admission of gun in car created exigent circumstances

It was reasonable for the officer to ask about defendant having a firearm in the car when responding to a 911 call without Mirandizing him under its “public safety exception.” When defendant admitted there was a gun, the officer had … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.S.C.: UnMirandized admission of gun in car created exigent circumstances

CA7: Two 911 calls about a road rage incident led to PC to search defendant’s car

A road rage incident was called into 911 twice by a woman involved who said the other driver was a man blocking her path, beating on her car window and shouting obscenities, and displaying a gun. When police arrived, they … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Two 911 calls about a road rage incident led to PC to search defendant’s car

TX6: Failure to cite state constitution and rules in argument on motion to suppress was waiver

While defendant’s motion to suppress cited the Fourth Amendment, the state constitution, and state criminal rules, at the hearing defendant mentioned only the Fourth Amendment, so the others were waived. Glenn v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 9433 (Tex. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX6: Failure to cite state constitution and rules in argument on motion to suppress was waiver

E.D.La.: Omitted informant information needs to be dispositive to undermine PC

More information could probably be included in all search warrant affidavits, but that doesn’t make them misleading for omissions. The omissions must be “dispositive” of probable cause, not just cast a little doubt on it. United States v. Wijetunge, 2015 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Omitted informant information needs to be dispositive to undermine PC

OH5: Citizen informant’s DUI tip line call wasn’t specific enough about DUI to support a stop

Defendant’s wife called a DUI tip line that he was driving having consumed alcohol. An officer stopped him without waiting for a traffic offense, which he would usually do. While she was an identified citizen informant, the tip was not … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: Citizen informant’s DUI tip line call wasn’t specific enough about DUI to support a stop

MA: A license plate reader is not treated as an anonymous informant with little or no credibility

A license plate reader is not treated as an anonymous informant with little or no credibility. It is based on a database that is sufficiently reliable to based a stop on. Commonwealth v. Ramos, 2015 Mass. App. LEXIS 116 (August … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: A license plate reader is not treated as an anonymous informant with little or no credibility

FL3: 3-4 police vehicles blocking def and taking ID and car keys led to consent being involuntary

Defendant did not consent because of a show of authority. “Despite the fact that, in this instance, the police were polite and did not draw their weapons, there was nevertheless the appearance of police authority and the circumstances were coercive … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on FL3: 3-4 police vehicles blocking def and taking ID and car keys led to consent being involuntary

CA7: CI’s prediction of route of travel confirmed by GPS planted with SW was PC

CI’s prediction of defendant’s route of travel with heroin was corroborated by GPS placed on defendant’s car with a warrant. United States v. Reaves, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13745 (7th Cir. August 6, 2015). A citizen informant called DC Metro … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: CI’s prediction of route of travel confirmed by GPS planted with SW was PC

DC: Entry on a domestic dispute unjustified by exigency; everybody involved was outside the house

The entry into defendant’s house was not supported by exigency. The police interviewed the participants in a domestic dispute outside, and there was no reason at all to believe that there was someone in the house in need of aid. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on DC: Entry on a domestic dispute unjustified by exigency; everybody involved was outside the house

D.Me.: Just having your stuff in a motel room rented by another doesn’t prove you’re an overnight guest

One defendant failed to even attempt to show standing in a motel room rented by a third man. The second defendant failed, too, but he was a little closer to the mark. Just having stuff in the room alone isn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on D.Me.: Just having your stuff in a motel room rented by another doesn’t prove you’re an overnight guest

S.D.Ohio: There was PC for a Facebook account SW

There was probable cause for a Facebook account search warrant for defendant’s account, and it was limited in time so it was not overbroad. Also, the good faith exception would apply. United States v. Lowry, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93257 … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: There was PC for a Facebook account SW

TN: CI’s reliability mooted by trash pull

Whether the CI was reliable was essentially moot based on a trash pull that showed all kinds of marijuana cuttings. State v. Altman, 2015 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 556 (July 13, 2015).* [Usually, the courts say that the CI was … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Independent source, Inevitable discovery, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on TN: CI’s reliability mooted by trash pull

AZ: Even def lying about his identity on arrest didn’t justify search incident of cell phone

When defendant was arrested, his cell phone was seized and searched, and it could not be justified as a search incident even though defendant initially lied about his name. State v. Ontiveros-Loya, 2015 Ariz. App. LEXIS 111 (June 30, 2015). … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on AZ: Even def lying about his identity on arrest didn’t justify search incident of cell phone

CA10: CI testified in 2255 there was no controlled buy supporting search warrant which Dist.Ct. credits; gun conviction set aside

The District Court held that there was a fraud on the court exception to AEDPA and set aside one of defendant’s convictions based on false evidence of a controlled buy by an informant related in a search warrant. The informant … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Police misconduct | Comments Off on CA10: CI testified in 2255 there was no controlled buy supporting search warrant which Dist.Ct. credits; gun conviction set aside

CA9: Stone v. Powell bar and the full and fair litigation requirement survived adoption of the AEDPA

Stone v. Powell bar and the full and fair litigation requirement survived adoption of the habeas limitations of AEDPA. Newman v. Wengler, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10094 (9th Cir. June 16, 2015). [This may be the only case to ever … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA9: Stone v. Powell bar and the full and fair litigation requirement survived adoption of the AEDPA