Category Archives: Automobile exception

N.D.Okla.: Where there is a SW for a vehicle, def’s automobile exception argument is moot

Defendant argues that the inventory was pretextual to search for evidence of crime, except that there already was probable cause at that point for an automobile exception search. On a later vehicle search, there also was a warrant. Failing to … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant papers | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Where there is a SW for a vehicle, def’s automobile exception argument is moot

D.Minn.: Automobile exception applied to RV with engine not on blocks; was capable of movement

Whether the engine of a mobile home was running or not doesn’t matter. It was capable of movement so the search was valid under the automobile exception. “The fact that the motor home had a bathroom and kitchen and looked … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Automobile exception applied to RV with engine not on blocks; was capable of movement

E.D.Mich.: Officers’ versions of arrest and search show two valid versions of why it was valid

The two officers involved in defendant’s stop and search of his person and car had somewhat different versions of what happened. Under either, the search of his person and car were both reasonable. Defendant had no DL which was an … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Search incident, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Officers’ versions of arrest and search show two valid versions of why it was valid

OR: Exigency for automobile exception has to exist at the time of search; telephonic warrant preferred

Oregon Supreme Court holds that the exigency for an automobile exception search under the state constitution must actually exist at the time of the search. The per se rule from 1986’s Brown case is overruled. Technological changes and statute since … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Exigency for automobile exception has to exist at the time of search; telephonic warrant preferred

N.D.Ohio: Def’s psychotherapist reported he was viewing CP; 4A does not prohibit using it in SW application

The psychotherapist-patient privilege does not bar use of a report from defendant’s psychotherapist to law enforcement that defendant admitted viewing child pornography. The psychotherapist discussed with others and concluded that a report was necessary. Whatever the privilege for trial, it … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s psychotherapist reported he was viewing CP; 4A does not prohibit using it in SW application

PA: With MMJ, smell of MJ from a car alone is not PC for a vehicle search

Pennsylvania is a medical marijuana state. “Like the Superior Court, we hold that the smell of marijuana may be a factor, but not a stand-alone one, in determining whether the totality of the circumstances established probable cause to permit a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on PA: With MMJ, smell of MJ from a car alone is not PC for a vehicle search

W.D.La.: Where the search was valid under the automobile exception, the officer’s subjective assessment is irrelevant

“Here, the facts known to Broussard at the time of the search—Dyson’s prior arrest for the illegal possession of a firearm and drugs, and the smell of marijuana emanating from the vehicle during the present stop—support a Terry pat-down search … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Where the search was valid under the automobile exception, the officer’s subjective assessment is irrelevant

TX4: Def abandoned his totaled car when it went to auto auction; black box search didn’t need a warrant

Defendant’s car was totaled in a wreck. He never came to get it or the stuff from it. His insurance company sent it to an auto auction for disposal. The police went there and retrieved the black box information without … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX4: Def abandoned his totaled car when it went to auto auction; black box search didn’t need a warrant

Cal.3: Smell of burnt MJ from car not PC in California

The smell of burnt marijuana coming from a car in California isn’t probable cause. Blakes v. Superior Court, 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS 1057 (3d Dist. Nov. 24, 2021) (published Dec. 16, 2021). Officers had probable cause for the automobile exception … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.3: Smell of burnt MJ from car not PC in California

D.D.C.: New 4A issues in reply brief are normally waived

After a motion to suppress was filed and briefed and the government responded, new issues in the reply brief are usually treated as waived. Here, however, the court will let him proceed on those issues and he can file a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Immigration arrests, Waiver | Comments Off on D.D.C.: New 4A issues in reply brief are normally waived

E.D.Mich.: When SW arrived for house, def’s vehicle parked two doors down could be searched with PC under automobile exception

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s house that included vehicles that were parked or came there. Defendant’s vehicle was parked two houses down from his house. The search of the vehicle was justified by the automobile exception. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: When SW arrived for house, def’s vehicle parked two doors down could be searched with PC under automobile exception

E.D.Mich.: Finding drugs on person during traffic custodial arrest permits vehicle search

Defendant’s stop was valid because the LPN was expired. While that proved to be untrue, the officer also learned early on the car was uninsured. With defendant arrested, the officer searched his person finding cocaine. That authorized a search of … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Finding drugs on person during traffic custodial arrest permits vehicle search

LA1: Subjective beliefs of officer irrelevant when PC exists

The trial court is reversed. There was probable cause for defendant’s stop. “Under the law, ‘the subjective beliefs or expectations of the detaining officer’ are irrelevant.” State v. Lee, 2021 La. App. LEXIS 1840 (La. App. 1 Cir. Dec. 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on LA1: Subjective beliefs of officer irrelevant when PC exists

N.D.Ohio: Officer doesn’t have to defer to mere chance motorist has CCL before seizing firearm in car

When a firearm was seen in defendant’s car, the officer did not have to even consider whether he was had a concealed carry license to seize it. Ferguson v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229451 (N.D.Ohio Dec. 1, 2021); … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Officer doesn’t have to defer to mere chance motorist has CCL before seizing firearm in car

LA1: SW not required under automobile exception

Defendant was involved in a struggle with another in a car, and he reached for the console to open it, and a gun was briefly visible. When he was finally arrested, a warrant was not required for search of the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Private search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on LA1: SW not required under automobile exception

GA: Probationer was unreasonably detained as suspect in a crime where he didn’t match

The state failed in its burden of proof that defendant was lawfully stopped and then detained as a possible suspect in a crime even though he was a probationer. His clothing didn’t match. It was prolonged way past its justification. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Probationer was unreasonably detained as suspect in a crime where he didn’t match

NY3: Tossing backpack from one’s window into the window of the abandoned house next door to avoid seizure is a waiver of REP

When the police came to his house, defendant threw a backpack with a sawed-off rifle from his second floor window into a window of the house next door. He claimed that house was his uncle’s, but it was unsecured and … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY3: Tossing backpack from one’s window into the window of the abandoned house next door to avoid seizure is a waiver of REP

CA11: Bag dropped to feet when def arrested couldn’t be searched incident to arrest; no safety concern

Officers accosted defendant to arrest him, and he dropped a paper bag. It could not seriously be argued that the bag contained a weapon. Moreover, the government did not argue abandonment. The district court erred in not granting the motion … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Search incident | Comments Off on CA11: Bag dropped to feet when def arrested couldn’t be searched incident to arrest; no safety concern

S.D.Miss.: Plain view of alleged drug residue was apparently false and a “comedy of errors”

Plastic wrappers or containers in cars are ubiquitous. The officer [almost obviously] made up a claim there was drug residue in a wrapper. First it was ecstacy, then it was cocaine. It’s all on bodycam. This was a “comedy of … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Plain view of alleged drug residue was apparently false and a “comedy of errors”

N.D.Ind.: The Rodriguez question is: Did the use of the dog prolong the stop

“The answer to this question doesn’t hinge on ‘whether the dog sniff occurs before or after the officer issues a ticket’ but whether the dog sniff ‘prolongs’ the stop. [Rodriguez] at 357. The answer today is undoubtedly no. Deputy Samuelson, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: The Rodriguez question is: Did the use of the dog prolong the stop