Category Archives: Automobile exception

IN: Transporting to stationhouse is a seizure

Transporting a juvenile down to the station was a seizure requiring probable cause, and here it was lacking. The patdown was unreasonable. D.Y. v. State, 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 147 (March 11, 2015). Officers had probable cause for the search … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Seizure, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on IN: Transporting to stationhouse is a seizure

D.Me.: Car with windows covered by curtains wasn’t the same as a home

2255 petitioner can’t show that he’d prevail on the merits of the search issues that counsel waived by not filing a motion to suppress. His car with windows covered by curtains wasn’t the same as a home, and it was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Me.: Car with windows covered by curtains wasn’t the same as a home

CA11: Automobile exception applied, so Gant argument moot

Defendant’s Gant almost hypertechnical search incident argument fails because the automobile exception applied in any event, so the search was good. United States v. Alston, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2367 (11th Cir. February 17, 2015). Officers in Memphis were saturating … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident | Comments Off on CA11: Automobile exception applied, so Gant argument moot

IA: Riley applied to a cell phone search from 2010

Defendant’s cell phone was searched in 2010, well before Riley, but a motion to suppress was filed and denied pre-Riley. The state concedes on appeal that Riley controls and attempts to get the contents of the phone in under exigent … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IA: Riley applied to a cell phone search from 2010

IA: Burnt aluminum foil in plain view in a car is probable cause for a search

Burnt aluminum foil in plain view in a car is probable cause for a search. State v. Johannes, 2015 Iowa App. LEXIS 25 (January 14, 2015). Officers assembled outside a hotel room after neighbors complained that there was yelling and … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Burnt aluminum foil in plain view in a car is probable cause for a search

E.D.Cal.: Non-residents can’t complain of a dog sniff in the yard of a grow operation at a house

Codefendants who did not live at the premises had no standing to contest the presence of a drug dog in the front yard to sniff. Codefendants’ brief presence at a grow operation, with other things, was still probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Dog sniff, Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Non-residents can’t complain of a dog sniff in the yard of a grow operation at a house

N.D.Ga.: Germany’s search of defs’ apartment there was independent of U.S. investigation

German investigators were independently investigating defendants for money laundering, and the FBI was informed because they were Americans. The German authorities coordinated with the U.S. authorities, and a search of the defendants’ German property was conducted as they were being … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Germany’s search of defs’ apartment there was independent of U.S. investigation

LA3: Invited in CI videoing drug transaction is not Fourth Amendment violation

There is no constitutional impediment to a wired CI coming into the defendant’s house to video record a drug transaction. He was invited in. State v. Montgomery, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2974 (La. App. 3 Cir. December 17, 2014). The … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on LA3: Invited in CI videoing drug transaction is not Fourth Amendment violation

CA5: Finding drugs in a car was probable cause to search other containers in the car

Finding drugs in a car was probable cause to search other containers in the car, here a bag. United States v. Leal, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23777 (5th Cir. February 7, 2014).* Defense counsel was not ineffective for withdrawing a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: Finding drugs in a car was probable cause to search other containers in the car

CA9: Cell phone is not a “container” under the automobile exception

In a cell phone search case submitted pre-Riley, the Ninth Circuit applies Riley and also holds that the proffered exigencies of the automobile exception and search incident do not apply to a search of the photographs and text messages on … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Search incident | Comments Off on CA9: Cell phone is not a “container” under the automobile exception

KS: Torn or knotted plastic baggie was PC for drugs in the car

A torn or knotted plastic baggie was probable cause for drugs in the car, although the question here is admittedly close. The officer’s experience was what made the difference. Plastic bags alone are meaningless. State v. Howard, 2014 Kan. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on KS: Torn or knotted plastic baggie was PC for drugs in the car

CA7: Consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review

On plain error review, consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review. United States v. Price\, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22996 (7th Cir. December 5, 2014). There was no evidence defense counsel didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: Consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review

CA11: SW was not bare bones and a reasonable officer could rely on it; therefore, qualified immunity

A search warrant issued for plaintiffs’ place based on a “13 year” drug investigation that led to trace evidence of drug usage in the basement. The charges filed were ultimately dismissed. The officers were qualifiedly immune because of the issuance … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: SW was not bare bones and a reasonable officer could rely on it; therefore, qualified immunity

IL: Implied consent law not per se unconstitutional under McNeely

Illinois’ implied consent statute is not unconstitutional per se under McNeely. Every case has to be judged on its own facts. This involved a serious accident with injuries requiring hospitalization and defendant consented to the blood draw. People v. Hasselbring, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Implied consent law not per se unconstitutional under McNeely

MO: Entry to talk to defendant about stolen car was without exigency and suppressed

Officers got word that a man was trying to sell a stolen car, and they gave defendant’s address. One drove by defendant’s house five times before finding the car there, so he called for back up, doing a knock-and-talk over … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk | Comments Off on MO: Entry to talk to defendant about stolen car was without exigency and suppressed

IL: Search under the automobile exception can occur after the car is moved to police station

The police had detailed probable cause from a CI there would be heroin in a hidden compartment in defendant’s car. The automobile exception permits the car to be moved to the police station for a search for the hidden compartment. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent | Comments Off on IL: Search under the automobile exception can occur after the car is moved to police station

E.D.Mich.: Generally, absent owner of a car loaned to somebody else doesn’t have standing to challenge the stop and then search of the car

Generally, the absent owner of a car loaned to somebody else doesn’t have standing to challenge the stop and then search of the car. United States v. Gonzalez, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162121 (E.D. Mich. November 19, 2014). Because of … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Generally, absent owner of a car loaned to somebody else doesn’t have standing to challenge the stop and then search of the car

CA11: Warrantless search of cell phone cured by later warrant on independent PC

The warrantless search of defendant’s cell phone had plenty of independent probable cause for later issuance of state and federal search warrants for it. “Additionally, the evidence relayed above was not obtained via any police misconduct but, rather, was obtained … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Independent source, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Warrantless search of cell phone cured by later warrant on independent PC

TX13: Neither automobile exception nor search incident permit warrantless blood draw for DUI

Exigent circumstances didn’t justify the warrantless blood draw. Neither the automobile exception nor the search incident doctrine can be used to search a person’s blood. Smith v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12372 (Tex. App.– Corpus Christi-Edinburg November 13, 2014):

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Search incident | Comments Off on TX13: Neither automobile exception nor search incident permit warrantless blood draw for DUI

OH3: Slightly pulling out bra by bottom elastic exposed nothing and wasn’t a strip search

Pulling defendant’s bra out slightly by the bottom elastic not exposing her breasts was not a strip search in violation of state statute or the Fourth Amendment. State v. Murphy, 2014-Ohio-5002, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 4861 (3d Dist. November 10, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on OH3: Slightly pulling out bra by bottom elastic exposed nothing and wasn’t a strip search