Category Archives: Automobile exception

IA applies special needs doctrine to parole searches for first time

Iowa applies the special needs doctrine to parole searches for the first time. It alluded to something like that in 1970, but the special needs doctrine hadn’t developed then. This parole search was reasonable under Griffin and the special needs … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probation / Parole search, Special needs | Comments Off on IA applies special needs doctrine to parole searches for first time

NH: Protective sweep applies to vehicles

Because defendant was known to have weapons and associated with violent persons, a protective sweep of his SUV was permissible under the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. State v. Francis, 2015 N.H. LEXIS 38 (May 12, 2015). Hand-to-hand drug … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NH: Protective sweep applies to vehicles

OR: PC for the automobile exception is not the same argument as car wasn’t mobile, so it’s waived for appeal

Defendant’s argument that there was not probable cause for the automobile exception is different from the issue of the automobile exception does not apply because the car was not mobile. Thus, it is not preserved for appeal. State v. Brock, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on OR: PC for the automobile exception is not the same argument as car wasn’t mobile, so it’s waived for appeal

MO: Trial court erred in suppressing car search incident without also considering automobile exception

The trial court erred in applying the search incident doctrine to defendant’s vehicle search and suppressing when the state also argued the automobile exception. Remanded for consideration of that issue, too. State v. Walker, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 501 (May … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident, Staleness | Comments Off on MO: Trial court erred in suppressing car search incident without also considering automobile exception

D.S.C.: Nexus shown simply by drug dealer going home after the sale

The affidavit here was short, but not “bare bones.” Also, nexus is shown because defendant left the drug deal and went home. United States v. Hooks, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183573 (D.S.C. April 21, 2014). 2255 petitioner did not show … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Nexus shown simply by drug dealer going home after the sale

NJLJ: NJ Court Mulls Easing Rules for Warrantless Auto Searches

NJLJ: NJ Court Mulls Easing Rules for Warrantless Auto Searches by Michael Booth: The New Jersey Supreme Court on April 14 heard arguments over whether it should scrap its six-year-old ruling that governs the standards police must follow when conducting … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on NJLJ: NJ Court Mulls Easing Rules for Warrantless Auto Searches

D.Nev.: Facebook post of dead protected migratory bird was PC

A Facebook post of a dead bird taken in violation of the Migratory Bird Act is itself probable cause of a violation of the Act. The only question then is the place to be searched, and it’s logical for a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Facebook post of dead protected migratory bird was PC

The automobile exception turned 90 this month. Thank you, Prohibition

We missed it: The automobile exception turned 90 years old on March 2. Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925) (7-2). The justification for the search was the Volstead Act (Prohibition) and the statutory authority given to Prohies to … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on The automobile exception turned 90 this month. Thank you, Prohibition

OR: Probable cause for arrest for burglary and furtive movements toward backpack made its search subject to search incident

The officer had objective evidence that the juvenile was involved in a burglary and a theft of an Xbox. When confronted he acted furtively and seemed like he was distancing himself from a backpack. That justified a search of the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident | Comments Off on OR: Probable cause for arrest for burglary and furtive movements toward backpack made its search subject to search incident

IN: Transporting to stationhouse is a seizure

Transporting a juvenile down to the station was a seizure requiring probable cause, and here it was lacking. The patdown was unreasonable. D.Y. v. State, 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 147 (March 11, 2015). Officers had probable cause for the search … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Seizure, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on IN: Transporting to stationhouse is a seizure

D.Me.: Car with windows covered by curtains wasn’t the same as a home

2255 petitioner can’t show that he’d prevail on the merits of the search issues that counsel waived by not filing a motion to suppress. His car with windows covered by curtains wasn’t the same as a home, and it was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Me.: Car with windows covered by curtains wasn’t the same as a home

CA11: Automobile exception applied, so Gant argument moot

Defendant’s Gant almost hypertechnical search incident argument fails because the automobile exception applied in any event, so the search was good. United States v. Alston, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2367 (11th Cir. February 17, 2015). Officers in Memphis were saturating … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident | Comments Off on CA11: Automobile exception applied, so Gant argument moot

IA: Riley applied to a cell phone search from 2010

Defendant’s cell phone was searched in 2010, well before Riley, but a motion to suppress was filed and denied pre-Riley. The state concedes on appeal that Riley controls and attempts to get the contents of the phone in under exigent … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IA: Riley applied to a cell phone search from 2010

IA: Burnt aluminum foil in plain view in a car is probable cause for a search

Burnt aluminum foil in plain view in a car is probable cause for a search. State v. Johannes, 2015 Iowa App. LEXIS 25 (January 14, 2015). Officers assembled outside a hotel room after neighbors complained that there was yelling and … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Burnt aluminum foil in plain view in a car is probable cause for a search

E.D.Cal.: Non-residents can’t complain of a dog sniff in the yard of a grow operation at a house

Codefendants who did not live at the premises had no standing to contest the presence of a drug dog in the front yard to sniff. Codefendants’ brief presence at a grow operation, with other things, was still probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Dog sniff, Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Non-residents can’t complain of a dog sniff in the yard of a grow operation at a house

N.D.Ga.: Germany’s search of defs’ apartment there was independent of U.S. investigation

German investigators were independently investigating defendants for money laundering, and the FBI was informed because they were Americans. The German authorities coordinated with the U.S. authorities, and a search of the defendants’ German property was conducted as they were being … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Germany’s search of defs’ apartment there was independent of U.S. investigation

LA3: Invited in CI videoing drug transaction is not Fourth Amendment violation

There is no constitutional impediment to a wired CI coming into the defendant’s house to video record a drug transaction. He was invited in. State v. Montgomery, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2974 (La. App. 3 Cir. December 17, 2014). The … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on LA3: Invited in CI videoing drug transaction is not Fourth Amendment violation

CA5: Finding drugs in a car was probable cause to search other containers in the car

Finding drugs in a car was probable cause to search other containers in the car, here a bag. United States v. Leal, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23777 (5th Cir. February 7, 2014).* Defense counsel was not ineffective for withdrawing a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: Finding drugs in a car was probable cause to search other containers in the car

CA9: Cell phone is not a “container” under the automobile exception

In a cell phone search case submitted pre-Riley, the Ninth Circuit applies Riley and also holds that the proffered exigencies of the automobile exception and search incident do not apply to a search of the photographs and text messages on … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Search incident | Comments Off on CA9: Cell phone is not a “container” under the automobile exception

KS: Torn or knotted plastic baggie was PC for drugs in the car

A torn or knotted plastic baggie was probable cause for drugs in the car, although the question here is admittedly close. The officer’s experience was what made the difference. Plastic bags alone are meaningless. State v. Howard, 2014 Kan. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on KS: Torn or knotted plastic baggie was PC for drugs in the car