Category Archives: Automobile exception

S.D.Ga.: Where def lost 4A claim on merits, he can’t relitigate it as an IAC claim

“Petitioner already presented his suppression argument to the Eleventh Circuit, and it was rejected. He now attempts to relitigate the claim by cloaking it in an ineffective assistance claim. However, Petitioner fails to establish Mr. Crowder’s decision not to pursue … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Where def lost 4A claim on merits, he can’t relitigate it as an IAC claim

OH11: Def’s admission he was wearing same shoes as the day of the murder was plain view

Defendant’s admission at his police interview that he was wearing the same shoes as the time of the murder justified seizure of the shoes as plain view. State v. Thomas, 2020-Ohio-4635, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3482 (11th Dist. Sept. 28, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH11: Def’s admission he was wearing same shoes as the day of the murder was plain view

D.N.H.: State liquor agents’ entry into public areas of licensee was reasonable as under administrative authority

NH state liquor agents didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment by entering public space of a regulated establishment to issue verbal warnings. The state supreme court has already held that liquor licensees were highly regulated businesses. E. Coast Serv. Indus. Co. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.N.H.: State liquor agents’ entry into public areas of licensee was reasonable as under administrative authority

TX7: Trial court’s initially misstating burden of proof was on def was corrected in the ultimate findings

The trial court first stated that the burden on consent was on the defendant, but the ultimate findings of fact and conclusions of law concluded that the state proved it by sufficient evidence. This corrected the previous mistake, and the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Search incident, Standards of review | Comments Off on TX7: Trial court’s initially misstating burden of proof was on def was corrected in the ultimate findings

CA5: Text messages on state employee’s state-issued cell phone were reasonably searched under Quon

The search of text messages on a state administrative enforcement officer’s state issued cell phone was reasonable under City of Ontario v. Quon. Tingle v. Hebert, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 26057 (5th Cir. Aug. 17, 2020). Defendant’s renting a car … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Text messages on state employee’s state-issued cell phone were reasonably searched under Quon

CA1: Inventory was shown to be investigative; suppression affirmed

“All in all, it seems inescapable that the officers seized Del Rosario’s car so that they could search it for evidence of a crime, and that they later sought to justify the search by invoking the community-caretaking exception. And while … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on CA1: Inventory was shown to be investigative; suppression affirmed

CA6: Def showed no REP in package with a fake name sent to his house

Defendant showed no reasonable expectation of privacy in a package addressed to a fake name at his address. United States v. James, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 22766 (6th Cir. July 21, 2020). Defendant failed to show that the challenged statements … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Mail and packages | Comments Off on CA6: Def showed no REP in package with a fake name sent to his house

W.D.Ky.: Automobile exception search doesn’t have to be done promptly

Where the stop and seizure of the vehicle was with probable cause, its automobile exception search could occur later. United States v. Brown, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120634 (W.D. Ky. July 9, 2020).* A private person finding defendant’s SD card … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Private search | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Automobile exception search doesn’t have to be done promptly

TN: Issue of issuing magistrate’s jurisdiction moot by automobile exception

Defendant’s dispute over whether the judge issuing the search warrant had jurisdiction over the vehicle from which DNA was taken because it was located in a different county is moot. The officers had probable cause in investigating a bloody homicide, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Issue of issuing magistrate’s jurisdiction moot by automobile exception

TN: Without findings of fact, the appellate court can review the dashcam video and draw its own conclusions

The trial court didn’t make findings of fact, so the appellate court can review the dashcam video and draw its own conclusions. “The trial court reviewed the testimony of the only witness and made an implicit finding that his testimony … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on TN: Without findings of fact, the appellate court can review the dashcam video and draw its own conclusions

E.D.Wis.: Open container in car justified search

An open container violation is an offense justifying a search of a vehicle for more. United States v. Hoskins, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90256 (E.D. Wis. May 22, 2020).* The stop reached the level of reasonable suspicion before dispatch responded, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Open container in car justified search

NY3: With PC and automobile exception, any hidden compartment can be searched

A probable cause search of a vehicle includes any hidden compartments. Here, they were apparent to the officers. People v. Kalabakas, 2020 NY Slip Op 02954, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3066 (3d Dept. May 21, 2020).

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on NY3: With PC and automobile exception, any hidden compartment can be searched

NE: Def’s purse could be searched under automobile exception even though it had already been removed from car

Defendant’s purse was validly searched under the automobile exception after the backup officer smelled marijuana coming from the car. It didn’t matter that it wasn’t in the car at the time of the search. State v. Lang, 305 Neb. 726 … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NE: Def’s purse could be searched under automobile exception even though it had already been removed from car

D.N.M.: Vehicle already searched under the automobile exception can be searched again at police station

A vehicle already searched under the automobile exception can be searched again after it is removed to the police lot. United States v. Mazon, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64813 (D. N.M. Apr. 13, 2020). The Texas trial court didn’t err … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Vehicle already searched under the automobile exception can be searched again at police station

S.D.Ga.: Renting a motel room doesn’t make their parking lot your curtilage

Just because defendant’s girlfriend rented a motel room and he was with her doesn’t make the motel parking lot their curtilage. “[N]ot even a hotel’s owner, to say nothing of its transitory guests, has a reasonable expectation of privacy in … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Renting a motel room doesn’t make their parking lot your curtilage

D.N.J.: There were material misrepresentations in the affidavit for a vehicle SW, but they are mooted by the automobile exception

The validity of the search warrant for defendant’s car was irrelevant where the automobile exception applied. Therefore, defendant’s Franks challenge is moot despite the fact there were material misrepresentations in the affidavit because the officers were trying to keep a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.N.J.: There were material misrepresentations in the affidavit for a vehicle SW, but they are mooted by the automobile exception

D.Mass.: Although stop might have been unreasonable, def fled from car and abandoned his drugs

Defendant’s stop likely was without reasonable suspicion, but he fled from the car after the stop and tossed a bag of drugs under another car. That was abandonment. United States v. Wilkins, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58058 (D.Mass. Apr. 2, … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Although stop might have been unreasonable, def fled from car and abandoned his drugs

S.D.Fla.: SW for apt and seizure of computers and cell phones includes power to search them later

A search warrant to search an apartment and seize computers and cell phones includes the power to search them later. United States v. Quinonez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55789 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 30, 2020). The officer’s statement that the CI’s … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: SW for apt and seizure of computers and cell phones includes power to search them later

CADC: AE applied to boxes police reasonably believed contained evidence that was being removed from the premises

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress the seizure of boxes of evidence from defendant’s car. It was reasonable for the officers to believe defendant was loading the car to move evidence to hide it when the police … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Automobile exception | Comments Off on CADC: AE applied to boxes police reasonably believed contained evidence that was being removed from the premises

OH5: Search was valid as inventory and AE

The vehicle search was valid as an inventory. When a weapon was found in the console, it was valid under the automobile exception. State v. Fawcett, 2020-Ohio-1004, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 925 (5th Dist. Mar. 12, 2020). The county’s insurance … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on OH5: Search was valid as inventory and AE