Category Archives: Consent

TX14: Bodycam video supported trial court’s findings of voluntariness of consent to search

The bodycam video supports the trial court’s conclusion that the consent to search was voluntarily given. Blue v. State, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 10658 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Dec. 10, 2019) (with a dissent). “Kelley’s only claim–a Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Consent, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on TX14: Bodycam video supported trial court’s findings of voluntariness of consent to search

NY1: SW for cell phone overbroad; no justification for searching photographs

The search warrant for the contents of defendant’s cell phone was overbroad because there was no justification for the breadth of search. This was a sex abuse case, but there was never any indication defendant possessed child pornography on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Overbreadth | Comments Off on NY1: SW for cell phone overbroad; no justification for searching photographs

CA1: Mere fact friend had possession of def’s bags didn’t show actual or apparent authority to consent

Defendant stored bags with a friend, and he ended up in jail. There was no actual or apparent authority shown for her to consent to search of the bags. The government carries the burden on both, and it fails. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on CA1: Mere fact friend had possession of def’s bags didn’t show actual or apparent authority to consent

OH8: State’s losing exhibits from suppression hearing requires new trial

Appellant appeals the denial of his suppression motion, but a bunch of the exhibits are missing. The state relies on precedent that it’s the appellant’s obligation to bring up a record. The state, however, somehow got Exhibits 1-23 back and … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH8: State’s losing exhibits from suppression hearing requires new trial

D.Guam: 4A standing is not jurisdictional, so the court can go to GFE without deciding PC

Standing to contest a search and seizure issue is not jurisdictional, so the court doesn’t have to decide standing. Going to the merits, there was probable cause for the search warrant for the package arriving by mail, and the delay … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Guam: 4A standing is not jurisdictional, so the court can go to GFE without deciding PC

E.D.Tenn.: Consent shown on the totality that def didn’t have to cooperate

“The totality of the circumstances here indicate consent, not mere acquiescence by Defendant. Regarding Defendant’s relevant characteristics, he is an adult, and there is no reason to think this was his first encounter with law enforcement, given that he is … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Consent shown on the totality that def didn’t have to cooperate

D.Mont.: Being ordered from your vehicle doesn’t require a Miranda warning

Being ordered from your vehicle doesn’t require a Miranda warning. Mimms, of course, permits the occupants to be ordered out. Over time, this ripened to reasonable suspicion. United States v. Lugo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200612 (D. Mont. Nov. 19, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Being ordered from your vehicle doesn’t require a Miranda warning

KS: Welfare check turned into unreasonable seizure without RS

The officer was called to a convenience store for a welfare check of a woman inside who apparently was sick. When she finally came out, she was fine and appeared fine, but the officer, for no apparent reason, escalated the … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent | Comments Off on KS: Welfare check turned into unreasonable seizure without RS

E.D.Mo.: Def consented to four undercover officers who first met him at post office to search house for a wanted man

Four undercover officers followed defendant to the Post Office, and they approached him about Jordan being at his house. He said they could come to the house, and he consented to an entry into the house and the look for … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Def consented to four undercover officers who first met him at post office to search house for a wanted man

OH2: Open-ended consent to search a car includes closed containers, here def’s purse

During a traffic stop, defendant consented to a search of her car. She was out of the car and her purse was inside. The consent was open-ended, and it thus would include closed containers, like her purse in the front … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH2: Open-ended consent to search a car includes closed containers, here def’s purse

S.D.Fla.: Cruise ship cabins are subject to border search

Defendants were passengers on the cruise ship MSC Seaside which arrived at Miami from Carribean ports. The passenger cabins were subject to search under the border search exception. When they knocked at the cabin door and it opened, they could … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Consent | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Cruise ship cabins are subject to border search

CA9: Shaking a fanny pack rather than searching it was reasonable during a stop-and-frisk

Shaking defendant’s fanny pack to see if there was a weapon rather than opening it was reasonable as a part of stop and frisk. United States v. Elenes, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 33067 (9th Cir. Nov. 5, 2019). Officers could … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Knock and talk, Protective sweep, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: Shaking a fanny pack rather than searching it was reasonable during a stop-and-frisk

W.D.Ky.: Consent to search a vehicle includes the spare tire compartment

Defendant’s open consent to search a vehicle included the spare tire compartment because it’s known that people secrete things there. United States v. Stevens, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191954 (W.D. Ky. Sept. 29, 2019), adopted, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190842 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Consent to search a vehicle includes the spare tire compartment

W.D.Mo.: Officer’s limited knowledge of Spanish still enabled her consent

Defendant claimed a lack of consent due to a language barrier. The court finds one officer was proficient enough in Spanish to effectively communicate the request for consent. United States v. Molina-Lopez, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191087 (W.D. Mo. Sept. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Consent | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Officer’s limited knowledge of Spanish still enabled her consent

D.N.J.: US can’t be sued under Bivens

Plaintiff can’t bring a Fourth Amendment Bivens claim against the United States because of sovereign immunity. There is always FTCA, but it has prerequisites. Leave to amend granted. Whitaker v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188071 (D. N.J. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on D.N.J.: US can’t be sued under Bivens

W.D.La.: Dismissal of indictment is not remedy for DEA allegedly violating its policy manual, even if it did

Defendant’s general allegation that the DEA officers violated their own policy manual isn’t specific and doesn’t even rise to the level of dismissal of the indictment, which is what he alleges. “Indeed, the Supreme Court has held that violations of … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Dismissal of indictment is not remedy for DEA allegedly violating its policy manual, even if it did

E.D.Wis.: Police allegely entered curtilage to shine headlights in windows, and homeowner consented to entry; def was inside and without standing to contest

Defendant contended that police drove onto the curtilage and shined police headlights and lights into the premises. The USMJ couldn’t adequately resolve that because of a lack of photographic evidence showing what was where. But, that led to a consent … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Police allegely entered curtilage to shine headlights in windows, and homeowner consented to entry; def was inside and without standing to contest

S.D.Ind.: Stalking horse rationale for PO’s cover for LEOs in search not universally accepted, and there was RS for this search anyway

Analyzing all the probation and parole search cases, the court finds defendant’s claim that probation was really a “stalking horse” for ATF unavailing. He had a reduced expectation of privacy and that there was reasonable suspicion for the search in … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Stalking horse rationale for PO’s cover for LEOs in search not universally accepted, and there was RS for this search anyway

NY3: Strip search after a frisk not justified merely for drug arrest; must be RS drugs on person, and here there wasn’t

Defendant had been frisked, and there’s no justification in New York for a strip search of all drug defendants without more information, at least reasonable suspicion, that drugs are actually secreted on the person. That was lacking here. People v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on NY3: Strip search after a frisk not justified merely for drug arrest; must be RS drugs on person, and here there wasn’t

CA7: Airbnb tenant who was theft victim can consent to police entry to rental unit

Plaintiff’s Airbnb tenant suffered a theft, and he had the authority to consent to an entry by police to investigate it. Wonsey v. City of Chicago, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 30651 (7th Cir. Oct. 15, 2019).* The officer didn’t prolong … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Airbnb tenant who was theft victim can consent to police entry to rental unit