Category Archives: Warrant execution

N.D.Ga.: The SW doesn’t have to be in hand at the place of search as long as it is complied with

In a pill mill case against two doctors, the search warrant incorporated a list of what they were looking for by saying “See Exhibit B.” The use of the word “see” incorporated Exhibit B. Moreover, Exhibit B didn’t need to … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: The SW doesn’t have to be in hand at the place of search as long as it is complied with

OH3: The 3 days that an Ohio SW has to be executed in is business days

Ohio’s rule that a search warrant be executed in three days doesn’t include weekends. State v. Seaburn, 2017-Ohio-7115, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 3241 (3d Dist. Aug. 7, 2017). Defendant’s jaywalking stop didn’t justify a patdown where defendant wasn’t even asked … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH3: The 3 days that an Ohio SW has to be executed in is business days

Trump team lawyer doesn’t understand search warrant process

Trump team lawyer doesn’t understand search warrant process, from Trump lawyer John Dowd: Robert Mueller’s team using tactics employed ‘in Russia not America’ by Anna Giaritelli in the Washington Examiner:

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Trump team lawyer doesn’t understand search warrant process

N.D.Ala.: Taint team not required for this document and ESI search, and that part of process vacated

The USMJ’s requirement of a taint team to review the materials seized in execution of the search warrant is unnecessary in this case and not required by the Fourth Amendment, and it is set aside. United States v. Sealed Search … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Taint team not required for this document and ESI search, and that part of process vacated

NYLJ: Executing Search Warrants in the Digital Age: ‘United States v. Wey’

NYLJ: Executing Search Warrants in the Digital Age: ‘United States v. Wey’ by Robert J. Anello & Richard F. Albert:

Posted in Computer searches, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NYLJ: Executing Search Warrants in the Digital Age: ‘United States v. Wey’

CA4: After seizure of cell phone, actual search under SW doesn’t have to happen by the date on the SW to be reasonable

The seizure then search of defendant’s cell phone under a search warrant was reasonable because the search followed the terms of the warrant. Actually analysis of the data doesn’t have to happen within the time on the face of the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: After seizure of cell phone, actual search under SW doesn’t have to happen by the date on the SW to be reasonable

W.D.N.C.: The time limit for execution of a SW doesn’t apply to the off-site search of a computer seized

The time limit for the search to occur in the warrant is for the place to be searched. When computers are seized under the warrant to be searched elsewhere, they are not subject to that time limit. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer searches, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: The time limit for execution of a SW doesn’t apply to the off-site search of a computer seized

D.Ore.: Gov’t’s mishandling of overseizure in Facebook SW didn’t prejudice defs so no suppression

The Facebook warrant was not overbroad, and it was consistent and less intrusive than a Facebook warrant previously approved by the Ninth Circuit in Flores. That which was nonresponsive to the warrant was previously ordered segregated and sealed, and the … Continue reading

Posted in Overseizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Ore.: Gov’t’s mishandling of overseizure in Facebook SW didn’t prejudice defs so no suppression

CA7: Controlled heroin buy led to drug warrant led to CP warrant

A drug raid on a convicted sex offender’s place found him with a half-naked 16 year old under the bed. She lied about her name and age, so the officers used their search warrant authorizing a search of cell phones … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: Controlled heroin buy led to drug warrant led to CP warrant

TN: SW for blood in one county can’t be executed in another

A search warrant for defendant’s blood was issued in Lewis County, but defendant was moved to Perry County for the blood draw. The search warrant had no effect in Perry County. State v. Nunnery, 2017 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 622 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: SW for blood in one county can’t be executed in another

CA5: Ptf doesn’t show that city’s alleged failure to use SWAT teams “threat matrix” properly led to any constitutional violation

Plaintiff failed to show a pattern of unconstitutional actions or that the SWAT teams’ use of a “threat matrix” to determine when they would be called out was unconstitutional. Plaintiff doesn’t show that the failure to implement that matrix properly … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf doesn’t show that city’s alleged failure to use SWAT teams “threat matrix” properly led to any constitutional violation

KS implied consent statute unconstitutional under Birchfield

The Kansas implied consent statute, K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 8-1025(a), is facially unconstitutional under Birchfield. State v. Ryce, 2017 Kan. LEXIS 327 (June 30, 2017). Under the Tennessee child exploitation statute, “process” that must be executed by the prosecutor means arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on KS implied consent statute unconstitutional under Birchfield