Category Archives: Admissibility of evidence

NY2: Failure to object to SW papers admitted into evidence at trial was waiver

Failure to object to admission of the search warrant papers into evidence at trial was waiver. People v. Mack, 2021 NY Slip Op 04377, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4456 (2d Dept. July 14, 2021).* “The Supreme Court reversed our … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Waiver | Comments Off on NY2: Failure to object to SW papers admitted into evidence at trial was waiver

LA5: Chain of custody issue after search isn’t a motion to suppress issue

A chain of custody dispute from a search isn’t proper in a motion to suppress. That’s a trial issue. State v. Mackey, 2021 La. App. LEXIS 1068 (La. App. 5 Cir. July 12, 2021). “Plaintiff Sally Gaetjens sued various local … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency, Immigration arrests, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on LA5: Chain of custody issue after search isn’t a motion to suppress issue

CA8: GPS info can provide RS as to def’s location whether or not it’s admissible at trial

GPS information as to defendant’s location can be reasonable suspicion despite defendant’s claims it might not be admissible at trial. United States v. Martin, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16822 (8th Cir. June 7, 2021):

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: GPS info can provide RS as to def’s location whether or not it’s admissible at trial

NY1: Cross-examination about potential suspects let go from scene of search opened door to suppressed statement

Defendant’s cross-examination about others not ultimately charged after the search opened the door to his suppressed statement. “First, defendant elicited that although the police arrested him and the other two persons who were in his apartment at the time a … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on NY1: Cross-examination about potential suspects let go from scene of search opened door to suppressed statement

E.D.Mich.: Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t permit the officer to open the door for him

Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t enable the officer to open the door for him. “As explained above, however, Trooper Miller’s stated purpose included an investigatory motive—verifying whether ‘something’ had been concealed—and his … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t permit the officer to open the door for him

E.D.Tenn.: Def first refused consent to DNA then sought it; initial refusal not excluded

Defendant declined to consent to a DNA test during his statement which is sought to be admitted. He later sought and consented to a DNA test. It should not be excluded at trial because it isn’t seeking to penalize his … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def first refused consent to DNA then sought it; initial refusal not excluded

W.D.N.Y.: 4A ER does not apply to def’s claim records obtained from others were “unreliable”

Defendant’s argument that the records obtained by search warrant from other are unreliable is not a Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule question. United States v. Skinner, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84377 (W.D. N.Y. May 3, 2021). A burnt blunt on the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: 4A ER does not apply to def’s claim records obtained from others were “unreliable”

OH4: Criminal investigation’s SW production was admissible in child dependency proceeding

A search warrant produced drug evidence admissible in a dependency and neglect proceeding, and that supported the finding. In re J.M., 2021-Ohio-1415, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 1376 (4th Dist. Apr. 19, 2021). Defendant’s son “posted a video on the internet” … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on OH4: Criminal investigation’s SW production was admissible in child dependency proceeding

E.D.Wis.: Video of aftermath of execution of SW more prejudicial than relevant under Rule 403

In a civil case over a shooting of dogs during execution of a search warrant, the court rejects that the warrant was unreasonable but finds the bodycam of shooting the dogs and the aftermath irrelevant and inflammatory under Rule 403. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Video of aftermath of execution of SW more prejudicial than relevant under Rule 403

M.D.Pa.: Credibility finding against officer in motion to suppress hearing in another case not admissible impeachment

The district court’s findings in another case that the officer here was not credible in his suppression hearing testimony could not be used to impeach the officer at trial in this cases, following United States v. Thompson, 2011 WL 2446564, … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Credibility finding against officer in motion to suppress hearing in another case not admissible impeachment

KY: Deputy in one county could go to another to investigate; no motion to suppress lies for statutory violation, if there even was one

A motion to suppress for a statutory violation doesn’t work in Kentucky absent a constitutional violation to found it on. Here, a deputy from one county crossed into another county to investigate. The statute defendant relies on deals with arrest, … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Exclusionary rule, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on KY: Deputy in one county could go to another to investigate; no motion to suppress lies for statutory violation, if there even was one

CO: Officer executing SW on Dropbox can authenticate the production at trial

When a search warrant is executed on a Dropbox account, the seizing officer’s knowledge of the seizure can authenticate the production. People v. Abad, 2021 COA 6, 2021 Colo. App. LEXIS 89 (Jan. 28, 2021). Franks offer fails: “The facts … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CO: Officer executing SW on Dropbox can authenticate the production at trial

NY1: A prior search admissible to show knowledge and lack of mistake when entrapment is raised

Defendant was a police officer charged with engaging in drug transactions. The defense was entrapment. A prior search warrant for drugs at an aunt’s apartment was admissible [404(b)] on the entrapment claim where she was present but not charged. People … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on NY1: A prior search admissible to show knowledge and lack of mistake when entrapment is raised

E.D.Pa.: State court’s suppression of evidence is a fact question for trial on underlying facts and findings and not preclusive

Plaintiff was charged in state court with possession, and the state court credited his version over that of the officers on the basis for the stop because their testimony was contradictory and confusing. Still, that doesn’t have preclusive effect in … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: State court’s suppression of evidence is a fact question for trial on underlying facts and findings and not preclusive

ND: Evidence seized by SW still needs to comply with rules of evidence to be admissible

Just because evidence was seized with a search warrant doesn’t make it admissible. The rules of evidence or other statute or rule still have to be complied with. City of Fargo v. Hofer, 2020 ND 252, 2020 N.D. LEXIS 264 … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ND: Evidence seized by SW still needs to comply with rules of evidence to be admissible

CA5: Def’s contesting authenticity of jail calls let the govt establish they came from jail

Not a search claim: Admission of jail telephone calls didn’t undermine the presumption of innocence. Defendant wouldn’t stipulate to authenticity so the government had to establish the source of the calls. United States v. Arayatanon, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 35922 … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Motion to suppress, Prison and jail searches, Waiver | Comments Off on CA5: Def’s contesting authenticity of jail calls let the govt establish they came from jail

CA5: GFE question is reasonableness of executing officer’s belief in PC

The district court erred in finding that the search warrant here was bare bones and that the good faith exception did not apply. There was a factual basis from which a reasonable officer would conclude there was probable cause. “But, … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Good faith exception, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA5: GFE question is reasonableness of executing officer’s belief in PC

OH8: Denial of cross-examination over affidavit for SW was harmless here

Officer’s statement in affidavit was assumed to be subject to cross-examination for impeachment purposes, but it was harmless error here. State v. Butts, 2020-Ohio-5011, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3843 (8th Dist. Oct. 22, 2020).* [Note: a new § 60.57 on … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH8: Denial of cross-examination over affidavit for SW was harmless here

AR: Video of arrest wasn’t claimed below to be a const’l claim, so it’s waived

Defendant sought to suppress the video of his arrest where he held a knife to his throat but he cited nothing for the Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendment, but he did cite Rule 403. The state argued it was evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Arrest or entry on arrest, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Video of arrest wasn’t claimed below to be a const’l claim, so it’s waived

FL4: SW of def’s cell phone authenticated text messages

After a search warrant produced defendant’s text messages, the state was able to authenticate them by the phone. State v. Torres, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 14356 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 7, 2020). “In addition, ‘[d]uring a valid traffic stop, officers … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on FL4: SW of def’s cell phone authenticated text messages