Author Archives: Hall

VI: Alleged consent at gunpoint after stop without RS was involuntary

Defendant was found to have been stopped at gunpoint without reasonable suspicion. Even if he said “‘do whatever you want,’ this Court finds that Schulterbrandt did not freely and voluntarily give his consent” to the armed force that just arrested … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Particularity | Comments Off on VI: Alleged consent at gunpoint after stop without RS was involuntary

MD: Consent to search of car doesn’t include a frisk of the person

Defendant consented to a search of his car, but that did not permit a frisk of his person. On the totality here, the officer did not have reasonable suspicion for a frisk of defendant’s person. Objectively, he had a hunch … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MD: Consent to search of car doesn’t include a frisk of the person

CADC: Executing daytime warrant at night was unreasonable and a violation of the 4A

Executing a daytime warrant at night violated clearly established law and was unreasonable and a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Jones v. Kirchner, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15759 (D.C.Cir. Aug. 26, 2016). This warrant provided: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CADC: Executing daytime warrant at night was unreasonable and a violation of the 4A

AR: While SW must be issued on affidavit or recorded testimony, questions about no-knock didn’t have to be recorded, especially when no-knock refused

Search warrants must be issued on affidavits or recorded testimony. The issuing judge asked questions about the no-knock entry, and this was separate from probable cause finding. This did not have to be recorded. Besides, the judge denied the no-knock … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on AR: While SW must be issued on affidavit or recorded testimony, questions about no-knock didn’t have to be recorded, especially when no-knock refused

The Hill: Feds brace for new drone rules to take flight

The Hill: Feds brace for new drone rules to take flight by Melanie Zanona: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is preparing for a swarm of drone applications when the first ever rule permitting small, routine drone flights goes into effect … Continue reading →

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on The Hill: Feds brace for new drone rules to take flight

CA2: Even if defendant’s stop violated the Fourth Amendment, his assault on the officer not suppressed

Even if defendant’s stop violated the Fourth Amendment, his assault on the officer would not be suppressed. United States v. Jenkins, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15539 (2d Cir. Aug. 24, 2016). Defendant’s 2255 claim seems to be that the government … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source | Comments Off on CA2: Even if defendant’s stop violated the Fourth Amendment, his assault on the officer not suppressed

CA2: Murder scene entry resulted in valid protective sweep and plain view

NYPD’s crime scene entry at the scene of a murder and protective sweep were all valid because of the exigency of the entry. Drug and other evidence was in plain view. [There are no facts talking about standing, or whether … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Murder scene entry resulted in valid protective sweep and plain view

VI: The court declines to adopt horizontal collective knowledge

The court declines to adopt horizontal collective knowledge since the V.I. Supreme Court has never addressed it. [It’s rationale, however, is likely at odds with Utah v. Strieff which likely was never briefed.] People v. Looby, 2016 V.I. LEXIS 114 … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge | Comments Off on VI: The court declines to adopt horizontal collective knowledge

IL: Officer’s entry was consented to and a suspect fled with officer chasing; when he came back he re-entered, and it was treated as part of initial entry

There was a consensual entry into a room, and a suspect fled. The officer gave chase and returned. Under state case law, that was essentially one continuous entry, and the second re-entry didn’t required a separate consent. Defendant, moreover, didn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Officer’s entry was consented to and a suspect fled with officer chasing; when he came back he re-entered, and it was treated as part of initial entry

NE follows Herring on no exclusion for slow updating of warrant database

Defendant was arrested based on an outdated warrant. State law prior to Herring likely would have provided relief, but the court is now bound by Herring and concludes that the exclusionary rule would not be applied. Yes, there was delay … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on NE follows Herring on no exclusion for slow updating of warrant database

ID: Interstate bus driver’s opening backpack was private search even though officer was watching

An interstate bus traveling from Portland OR to Salt Lake City stopped in Boise. The bus driver was moving luggage around to straighten it up for the boarding passengers, and he smelled marijuana coming from a backpack. He called the … Continue reading →

Posted in Common law, Private search | Comments Off on ID: Interstate bus driver’s opening backpack was private search even though officer was watching

CA2: NYC cab driver didn’t show standing to contest GPS tracking of a taxicab

“Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, J.), granting summary judgment to Defendants Appellees, the City of New York and various of its employees, on Plaintiff Appellant Hassan El … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA2: NYC cab driver didn’t show standing to contest GPS tracking of a taxicab

NH: Court can’t force state to search sex case complainant’s cell phone as discovery

In a sex assault case, the trial court did not have the authority to compel the state to search the complainant’s cell phone for voice mails and text messages for the defense as a part of discovery. It’s not the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NH: Court can’t force state to search sex case complainant’s cell phone as discovery

OH2: Odor of marijuana, air fresheners, and window down when it was 25º is RS

Odor of marijuana, air fresheners, and window down when it was 25º was reasonable suspicion. State v. Hicks, 2016-Ohio-5439, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 3341 (2d Dist. Aug. 19, 2016).* Plaintiff’s Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment tort claims denied in … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Odor of marijuana, air fresheners, and window down when it was 25º is RS

CA11: Shooting unarmed man as excessive force is clearly established; summary judgment properly denied

Summary judgment properly denied for a police killing of an unarmed man who had been twice Tazered, the first time with a knife in his kitchen who then ran to his bathroom and was Tazered coming out then shot. The … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Shooting unarmed man as excessive force is clearly established; summary judgment properly denied

CA6: Turning around because of a wrong turn toward Canada doesn’t bar a border search coming back

Plaintiff made a wrong turn heading to summer camp and ended up on a bridge to Canada. He was allowed to turn around without leaving the country, but he could only get into a lane with motorists coming from Canada … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on CA6: Turning around because of a wrong turn toward Canada doesn’t bar a border search coming back

CA7: Inevitable discovery doesn’t apply to DNA blood draw [via a habeas appeal]

The Seventh Circuit here dealt with a Fourth Amendment IAC claim. The court dealt with the Fourth Amendment merits, which was far easier, rather than get into the complexity of Stone v. Powell deterrence issue under a § 2254 claim. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA7: Inevitable discovery doesn’t apply to DNA blood draw [via a habeas appeal]

W.D.Mo.: Def running around naked on street on PCP and kids in house justified emergency

Defendant was raving and running around naked on PCP “and was exhibiting bizarre and erratic behavior” and his front door was left open. There were children in the house, and the police were permitted under the emergency aid exception to … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Def running around naked on street on PCP and kids in house justified emergency

OH9: Dog sniff during normal incidents of traffic stop not unreasonable

A dog sniff during the normal incidents of a traffic stop isn’t unreasonable. An arrest outside of an officer’s jurisdiction in violation of statute also thus violates the state constitution but not the Fourth Amendment. State v. Duran, 2016-Ohio-5459, 2016 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff | Comments Off on OH9: Dog sniff during normal incidents of traffic stop not unreasonable

DE: Admitting violation of probation is a waiver of suppression issue

Admitting to the violation of probation is a waiver of any suppression issue. Thompson v. State, 2016 Del. LEXIS 441 (Aug. 19, 2016). The fact that defendant matched the description of a suspicious person reported to the police, was in … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Admitting violation of probation is a waiver of suppression issue