Author Archives: Hall

AZ: Passenger in a vehicle has standing to contest GPS surveillance of vehicle, but here GFE applies because pre-Jones

The passenger in a vehicle subjected to GPS monitoring even for a few days and on public roads has standing to contest the monitoring. Here, however, the GPS device was placed in February 2010, more than two years prior to … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on AZ: Passenger in a vehicle has standing to contest GPS surveillance of vehicle, but here GFE applies because pre-Jones

Cal.1: School search rationale applies to street cop called in to back up school resource officer

A school principal received a report from a CI student that the juvenile had a gun in school. He sent for the student who came to the office where a school resource officer and a street officer were waiting. “For … Continue reading →

Posted in School searches | Comments Off on Cal.1: School search rationale applies to street cop called in to back up school resource officer

W.D.Ky.: Motion to reconsider denial of motion to suppress only raised a trial issue, not a suppression issue, so denied

Defendant’s motion to reconsider the prior denial of a motion to suppress is denied because he raises essentially only an issue for trial as to where a gun was found, not to suppress evidence. United States v. Keeling, 2018 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Motion to reconsider denial of motion to suppress only raised a trial issue, not a suppression issue, so denied

CA10: Franks doesn’t apply to private actors providing false information to LEOs

Even assuming private volunteer animal cruelty investigators provided false information that was used to get search warrants issued for plaintiffs’ property for evidence of cockfighting, qualified immunity applies because no case holds that the Franks doctrine applies to a private … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Franks doesn’t apply to private actors providing false information to LEOs

D.Me.: Getting def to reveal cell phone passcode was 5A claim, not a 4A claim

Defendant’s cell phone was seized with a warrant. Defendant was questioned and he lawyered up, but the officer ignored it and kept asking questions. Finally, defendant gave up the passcode for the phone. This is a Fifth Amendment issue, not … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Me.: Getting def to reveal cell phone passcode was 5A claim, not a 4A claim

Volokh Conspiracy: A Few Thoughts on Collins v. Virginia & Four Thoughts on Byrd v. United States

Volokh Conspiracy: A Few Thoughts on Collins v. Virginia by Orin Kerr Volokh Conspiracy: Four Thoughts on Byrd v. United States by Orin Kerr

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: A Few Thoughts on Collins v. Virginia & Four Thoughts on Byrd v. United States

Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches

Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches by Damon Root:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Justices to consider scope of Fourth Amendment’s “automobile exception”

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Justices to consider scope of Fourth Amendment’s “automobile exception” by Amy Howe:

Posted in Automobile exception, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Justices to consider scope of Fourth Amendment’s “automobile exception”

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: For Fourth Amendment purposes, does it matter who is on the car-rental agreement?

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: For Fourth Amendment purposes, does it matter who is on the car-rental agreement? by Amy Howe:

Posted in SCOTUS, Standing | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: For Fourth Amendment purposes, does it matter who is on the car-rental agreement?

National Review: Opinion: We Were Wrong about Stop-and-Frisk

National Review: Opinion: We Were Wrong about Stop-and-Frisk by Kyle Smith:

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on National Review: Opinion: We Were Wrong about Stop-and-Frisk

The Hill: Opinion: Bulk surveillance is the wrong way to approach security

The Hill: Opinion: Bulk surveillance is the wrong way to approach security by Neema Singh Guliani & Jason Pye:

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on The Hill: Opinion: Bulk surveillance is the wrong way to approach security

D.Md.: While def’s statement is suppressed for a Miranda violation, he still consented to a search of his car during the suppressed statement

While defendant’s confession was suppressed for a Miranda violation, his consent to search was still valid because his will was not overborne. United States v. Woodland, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 319 (D. Md. Jan. 2, 2018):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Md.: While def’s statement is suppressed for a Miranda violation, he still consented to a search of his car during the suppressed statement

MN: Birchfield not retroactive

Application of Birchfield in Minnesota was determined to be procedural rather than substantive for purposes of retroactive effect. Johnson v. State, 2018 Minn. App. LEXIS 10 (Jan. 2, 2018). Defendant’s detention was with reasonable suspicion. “Considering the totality of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MN: Birchfield not retroactive

CA5: Forgoing license check not unreasonable under Rodriguez where investigation is proceeding apace

“Burcham’s argument based on Rodriguez v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 1609 (2015), is unavailing. Rodriguez is distinguishable; the district court did not err in finding that Jenkins’s decision to extend the stop was justified by additional reasonable suspicion developed from … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA5: Forgoing license check not unreasonable under Rodriguez where investigation is proceeding apace

OH8: Drug dog on scene while ticket being written caused no additional detention

Defendant’s stop was with reasonable suspicion based on corroborated informant hearsay. “Because the police were still in the process of writing the traffic ticket when the canine arrived and conducted the sniff, and thus the stop was not unlawfully extended.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH8: Drug dog on scene while ticket being written caused no additional detention

MyNewsLA.com: Apartment building owners sue LA over rent stabilization, argue ordinance hurts tenants

MyNewsLA.com: Apartment building owners sue LA over rent stabilization, argue ordinance hurts tenants by Toni McAllister:

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MyNewsLA.com: Apartment building owners sue LA over rent stabilization, argue ordinance hurts tenants

D.D.C.: Suppressed evidence [a confession] leads to grant of pretrial release

The question of the effect of suppressed evidence on the question of bail is considered at length in United States v. Taylor, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205 (D.D.C. Jan. 2, 2018), albeit here in a suppressed confession. The court concludes … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Suppressed evidence [a confession] leads to grant of pretrial release

CA8: Denying any knowledge of a car or its contents is abandonment of a cell phone found inside it; cell phones subject to abandonment

Defendant was believed connected to a shooting involving a Buick. He was taken back to the Buick after arrest, and he denied all knowledge of the Buick. Inside was found a cell phone that the police seized and obtained a … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA8: Denying any knowledge of a car or its contents is abandonment of a cell phone found inside it; cell phones subject to abandonment

W.D.Mo.: Shrugging shoulders in response to a question was consent

The court finds defendant consented to a search of his bag on a bus by a shrug of his shoulders. United States v. Salas-Lopez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212709 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 16, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212286 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Shrugging shoulders in response to a question was consent

California, Florida, Illinois, and Texas versions of Search and Seizure

Want to write a version of Search and Seizure for your state? Have two years to spend on advancing your own knowledge of the subject? Lexis plans state specific versions of Search and Seizure for these states. Email the author … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on California, Florida, Illinois, and Texas versions of Search and Seizure