Author Archives: Hall

Journal Times editorial (Mulwaukee): The Cellebrite and its threat to your constitutional rights

Journal Times editorial (Mulwaukee): The Cellebrite and its threat to your constitutional rights. Racine WI acquires a Cellebrite.

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Journal Times editorial (Mulwaukee): The Cellebrite and its threat to your constitutional rights

D.Neb.: ATF administrative inspection can occur even though they had PC; SW not required

Just because ATF had reasonable cause doesn’t mean that they needed a search warrant to conduct an administrative inspection of a gun dealer’s records. United States v. Melton, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221663 (D. Neb. Dec. 28, 2018):

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on D.Neb.: ATF administrative inspection can occur even though they had PC; SW not required

CA11: Occasional visitor at house had no standing

“Here, Rodriguez’s limited relationship to Weeks’s house does not grant him a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. Rodriguez testified at the suppression hearing that he went to Weeks’s house after being invited, not on his own accord. He also … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Occasional visitor at house had no standing

CA6: State SW can be used to bring a federal prosection

A state search warrant, of course, can be used to initiate a federal prosecution. Dismissal of the state case in favor of federal prosecution is not res judicata. Moreover, the federal government isn’t a party in the state case. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: State SW can be used to bring a federal prosection

DE: A probation search that didn’t comply with the probation laws couldn’t be used in a criminal proceeding

A probation search that didn’t comply with the probation laws couldn’t be used in a criminal proceeding. Walker v. State, 2019 Del. LEXIS 88 (Feb. 21, 2019). The record doesn’t show that defendant’s plea was conditional, so there is no … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on DE: A probation search that didn’t comply with the probation laws couldn’t be used in a criminal proceeding

CA4: Seizure of Nazi materials in a SW for an ISIL suspect was reasonable because both are defined as terrorist organizations

Defendant was alleged to be connected to ISIL, and, in a terrorism investigation, the government executed a search warrant at his home. Seizure of Nazi materials wasn’t outside the scope of the search warrant: “a reasonable officer would be able … Continue reading →

Posted in Overseizure | Comments Off on CA4: Seizure of Nazi materials in a SW for an ISIL suspect was reasonable because both are defined as terrorist organizations

NY: No REP or 4A right against recording of calls from prison

No Fourth Amendment right of defendant was violated by recording his prison calls and then admitting them into evidence. He was well on notice that they were recorded. People v. Diaz, 2019 NY Slip Op 01260, 2019 N.Y. LEXIS 266 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY: No REP or 4A right against recording of calls from prison

N.D.Ill.: Despite McDonald under the 2A, apparent possession of a weapon after hearing shots fired can be considered as RS

Defendant asserted that he had a Second Amendment right to possess a handgun, and that the court could not consider that in assessing reasonable suspicion. The court disagrees because here the officers were responding to hearing shots fired and saw … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Despite McDonald under the 2A, apparent possession of a weapon after hearing shots fired can be considered as RS

D.Minn.: Exigent cell phone ping not barred by Carpenter

An exigent circumstances cell phone ping was not prohibited by Carpenter. United States v. Andrews, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26283 (D. Minn. Feb. 20, 2019):

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Exigent cell phone ping not barred by Carpenter

DE: No error in order denying production of a DNA warrant in an unrelated case without showing any relevance

There was no abuse of discretion in the trial court refusing to make the state produce a DNA affidavit and search warrant in another case not shown to be relevant here. White v. StateWhite v. StateWhite v. State, 2019 Del. … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Probable cause | Comments Off on DE: No error in order denying production of a DNA warrant in an unrelated case without showing any relevance

S.D.N.Y.: Overseizure from iCloud account wasn’t so flagrant it required suppression; govt agreed in advance to exclude the overseized

The government’s overseizure from defendant’s iCloud account wasn’t so flagrant or egregious to warrant suppression. The government agreed up-front to exclude the obvious, and that’s a sufficient remedy. United States v. Pinto-Thomaz, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26262 (S.D. N.Y. Feb. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overseizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Overseizure from iCloud account wasn’t so flagrant it required suppression; govt agreed in advance to exclude the overseized

Darwin Award nominee

Facebook posts eight days after a home invasion robbery show the defendants wearing the victims’ stolen Rolex and other jewelry including a unique gold coin necklace and handling the guns used in the robbery. The videos were not more prejudicial … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Darwin Award nominee

TX13: Unsatisified state requirement issuing magistrate’s name be clearly stated warranted suppression

Texas added a fifth requirement to search warrants that the issuing magistrate’s name be clearly legible. It can be incorporated from the affidavit. Here it wasn’t, and the motion to suppress was properly granted and no good faith exception applies. … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX13: Unsatisified state requirement issuing magistrate’s name be clearly stated warranted suppression

NM: Reserve deputy’s stop of suspected DUI to call for a deputy was a reasonable minor intrusion

A reserve deputy followed defendant who was driving badly and then she ran into a car in her driveway. He stopped behind her and told her to “hang tight,” and he called for a deputy. The stop was reasonable, considering … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NM: Reserve deputy’s stop of suspected DUI to call for a deputy was a reasonable minor intrusion

W.D.Ky.: A customer leaving def’s house with a lot of drugs was nexus to def’s house

“Similarly, in this case, Charles Williams was discovered with a large amount of narcotics immediately after leaving the Target Apartment. … This incident alone is enough to establish a nexus to the Apartment to justify a warrant to search the … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: A customer leaving def’s house with a lot of drugs was nexus to def’s house

NY3: Def counsel was ineffective for not objecting to SW affidavit coming into evidence full of inadmissible informant hearsay

Defendant proved ineffective assistance of counsel from defense counsel’s failure to object to the search warrant application coming into evidence full of informant hearsay that wasn’t admissible in the case in chief. People v. Newman, 2019 NY Slip Op 01263, … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NY3: Def counsel was ineffective for not objecting to SW affidavit coming into evidence full of inadmissible informant hearsay

CA4: More than one person can have authority to issue command authorized search under Mil.R.Evid. 315(d)

Defendant was subjected to a command authorized search under Mil.R.Evid. 315(d). He argues that the definition of who is in control to authorize the search isn’t clear. Well, it isn’t, but that doesn’t mean that multiple people might not fit … Continue reading →

Posted in Military searches | Comments Off on CA4: More than one person can have authority to issue command authorized search under Mil.R.Evid. 315(d)

D.Me.: Officers’ lack of awareness of def’s mental illness a factor in def’s consent to search

Officers were unaware of defendant’s mental illness when they talked to him and secured his consent. On the totality, it is found voluntary. United States v. Merrill, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25763 (D. Me. Feb. 19, 2019) [it seems to … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Me.: Officers’ lack of awareness of def’s mental illness a factor in def’s consent to search

Crime Report: Drones and the Fourth Amendment: Do ‘Eyes in the Sky’ See Too Much?

Crime Report: Drones and the Fourth Amendment: Do ‘Eyes in the Sky’ See Too Much? by Lauren Sonnenberg:

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on Crime Report: Drones and the Fourth Amendment: Do ‘Eyes in the Sky’ See Too Much?

ACLU blog: The Government Cannot Force E-mail Companies to Copy and Save Your Account ‘Just in Case’

ACLU blog: The Government Cannot Force E-mail Companies to Copy and Save Your Account ‘Just in Case’ by Melodi Dincer & Kristin M. Mulvey:

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on ACLU blog: The Government Cannot Force E-mail Companies to Copy and Save Your Account ‘Just in Case’