CA11: Occasional visitor at house had no standing

“Here, Rodriguez’s limited relationship to Weeks’s house does not grant him a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. Rodriguez testified at the suppression hearing that he went to Weeks’s house after being invited, not on his own accord. He also testified that he did not keep personal items at the home, have keys to it, or exercise control over who was present in the home. Nor had he ever removed anyone from the home, locked any doors, or slept overnight at the home. He claimed that he had been present at the home on five to eight occasions.” He claimed he brought pants to be hemmed, but the USMJ found that not credible since no pants were there. United States v. Rodriguez, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 5015 (11th Cir. Feb. 21, 2019).*

Year old information that child pornography might be found on defendant’s cell phone wasn’t stale. United States v. Ruelas, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 5177 (5th Cir. Feb. 22, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Staleness, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.