Author Archives: Hall

GA: No REP in a police interview room where a call was overheard and recorded

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a police interview room. Defendant had been Mirandized and left alone in the room, knowing he was not free to leave, and told he was a suspect in a crime. He made … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on GA: No REP in a police interview room where a call was overheard and recorded

S.D.Fla.: Ptf sufficiently pled a civil Franks claim that survives summary judgment and QI

Plaintiff sufficiently pled a civil Franks claim that survives summary judgment and qualified immunity. Wooden v. Armenteros, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106113 (S.D. Fla. June 25, 2019).* “At this stage of the proceedings, viewing the evidence in the light most … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Ptf sufficiently pled a civil Franks claim that survives summary judgment and QI

E.D.Mich.: The affidavit for SW didn’t show nexus, but it wasn’t so lacking that GFE still didn’t apply

The court concludes that the government lacked nexus to defendant’s home for the search warrant because the proof was just lacking. It came down to two cases with similar but still sufficiently different facts reaching seemingly contradictory results on nexus. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: The affidavit for SW didn’t show nexus, but it wasn’t so lacking that GFE still didn’t apply

GA: Def was properly allowed at trial to cross-examine searching officer about contents of affidavit despite the affidavit not coming into evidence

Defendant was allowed to cross-examine the investigator concerning the contents of the search warrant application to impeach. The trial court’s not permitting the actual affidavit into evidence wasn’t prejudicial. Hawkins v. State, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 377 (June 24, 2019). … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on GA: Def was properly allowed at trial to cross-examine searching officer about contents of affidavit despite the affidavit not coming into evidence

D.S.D.: Contents of partially open box in post office was within plain view

A priority mail box was partially open and inadequately sealed in a post office on tribal lands. A baggie of apparent methamphetamine was visible inside. The post office called the tribal police, and that officer saw it too. This was … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Contents of partially open box in post office was within plain view

WaPo: Data brokers are selling your secrets. Some states are trying to stop them. It isn’t easy.

WaPo: Data brokers are selling your secrets. Some states are trying to stop them. It isn’t easy. By Douglas MacMillan: Vermont’s new data broker registry highlights the difficulties of regulating dozens of secretive firms that buy and sell the personal … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Data brokers are selling your secrets. Some states are trying to stop them. It isn’t easy.

MN: Search of rented room in single family dwelling was reasonable under SW; it wasn’t apparent it was rented

In a stipulated evidence suppression hearing, defendant did not preserve the issue he presents for appeal. Going to the merits anyway, defendant claimed that his rented room in what was, for all appearances, a single family dwelling was reasonable. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MN: Search of rented room in single family dwelling was reasonable under SW; it wasn’t apparent it was rented

The Crime Report: Stop and Fix? How the ‘High-Crime Area’ Defense Has Licensed Bad Policing

The Crime Report: Stop and Fix? How the ‘High-Crime Area’ Defense Has Licensed Bad Policing by James M. Doyle:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on The Crime Report: Stop and Fix? How the ‘High-Crime Area’ Defense Has Licensed Bad Policing

WaPo: Goodbye, Chrome: Google’s web browser has become spy software

WaPo: Goodbye, Chrome: Google’s web browser has become spy software by Geoffrey A. Fowler: Our latest privacy experiment found Chrome ushered more than 11,000 tracker cookies into our browser — in a single week. Here’s why Firefox is better.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Goodbye, Chrome: Google’s web browser has become spy software

WaPo: Hacked documents reveal sensitive details of expanding border surveillance

WaPo: Hacked documents reveal sensitive details of expanding border surveillance by Drew Harwell: Far more information was taken in the hack of a Customs and Border Protection contractor than U.S. officials have acknowledged.

Posted in Border search, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Hacked documents reveal sensitive details of expanding border surveillance

D.Mass.: ICE civil immigration arrests at Boston state courthouse enjoined

In a case brought by the Suffolk County DA in Boston, ICE is ordered to not civilly arrest witnesses and defendants at the courthouse. At common law, witnesses were immune from civil arrest at court. The court finds nothing in … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on D.Mass.: ICE civil immigration arrests at Boston state courthouse enjoined

D.Mont.: Locked gun safe in house subject to parole search condition

A locked gun safe was subject to a parole search condition. United States v. Crawford, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104527 (D. Mont. June 21, 2019). The facts and circumstances of this case show probable cause for obtaining DNA from defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Locked gun safe in house subject to parole search condition

CA8: Failure to knock-and-announce not a suppression issue

“[T]he officers’ alleged violation of the knock-and-announce rule had nothing to do with their seizure of the gun, drugs, and cash in Diaz-Ortiz’s hotel room pursuant to their search warrant.” Relief is barred by Hudson. United States v. Diaz-Ortiz, 2019 … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on CA8: Failure to knock-and-announce not a suppression issue

LA3: State showed abandonment of car at hearing even though trial court decided on other grounds

The state argued and showed abandonment, but the trial court didn’t decide it. On appeal, the court finds that defendant abandoned his car after a police chase and he bailed out of the car and ran. State v. Guidry, 2019 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abandonment, Standards of review | Comments Off on LA3: State showed abandonment of car at hearing even though trial court decided on other grounds

PA: Franks challenge fails for failure to plead

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails for failure to even plead enough. “Appellant never alleged that the police made deliberately false statements or made statements with a reckless disregard for the truth in asserting that McKnight had witnessed the shooting.” Commonwealth v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on PA: Franks challenge fails for failure to plead

OH4: In applying GFE, court isn’t bound by the “four corners” rule because Leon requires “all the circumstances” be considered

The affidavit for search warrant was lacking probable cause, but it wasn’t “so lacking” that the good faith exception did not apply. Also, the “four corners” rule doesn’t bar a trial court from considering “all the circumstances” in deciding whether … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH4: In applying GFE, court isn’t bound by the “four corners” rule because Leon requires “all the circumstances” be considered

C.D.Ill.: Evidence used at trial not subject to return under Rule 41(g)

That which was used as evidence at trial is not yet subject to return under Rule 41(g). The government responded by affidavit. United States v. Hathaway, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104035 (C.D. Ill. June 21, 2019). “It was error as … Continue reading →

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Evidence used at trial not subject to return under Rule 41(g)

KS: Trial court’s finding of probable racial bias in stop was supported by record

The district court’s finding that the Kansas statute on racial bias in stops was violated is supported by the record. State v. Gill, 2019 Kan. App. LEXIS 40 (June 21, 2019):

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on KS: Trial court’s finding of probable racial bias in stop was supported by record

D.Minn.: A court order doesn’t have to be called a “search warrant” to be one; CSLI order issued with PC

The CSLI order in this case was based on probable cause. It didn’t say “search warrant,” but it doesn’t have to to be one. In any event, the good faith exception was satisfied. United States v. Stachowiak, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: A court order doesn’t have to be called a “search warrant” to be one; CSLI order issued with PC

ME: No standing in co-conspirator’s CSLI even when they were tracked together

Defendant lacked standing to contest the CSLI acquisition of his co-conspirator’s cell phone when the police were looking for both. The same rule applies to his Fourth Amendment claim and his claim under Maine’s Electronic Device Location Information Act. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Border search, Cell site location information, Standing | Comments Off on ME: No standing in co-conspirator’s CSLI even when they were tracked together