Author Archives: Hall

CA6: § 1983 malicious prosecution claims are made under 4A not 14A

Malicious prosecution claims are to be brought under the Fourth Amendment and not substantive due process. Davis v. Gallagher, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 6180 (6th Cir. Feb. 28, 2020). Driving with hands at the 10 and 2 position was suspect … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Police misconduct, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: § 1983 malicious prosecution claims are made under 4A not 14A

NC: Ordering traffic detainee to get in police car and shut door after stop should have been over unreasonably extended it

The officer unreasonably extended the stop past the time for resolving the alleged traffic violations. He told defendant to get into the police car, and defendant did, but left the passenger door open with his right leg out. The officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NC: Ordering traffic detainee to get in police car and shut door after stop should have been over unreasonably extended it

FL2: State’s failure to make record on GFE gets remand

The trial court’s failure to address the good faith exception as an alternative to alleged lack of probable cause precludes the state from relying on it. Remanded to make a record. Hicks v. State, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 2465 (Fla. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Good faith exception | Comments Off on FL2: State’s failure to make record on GFE gets remand

GA: SW for “electronic data” includes photos on a cell phone

Defendant claimed to be staying in a vacant apartment with the permission of a friend (who was not the landlord). There was probable cause to arrest him for theft of services (not to mention trespass). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: SW for “electronic data” includes photos on a cell phone

OH2: Nighttime SW approved essentially just because police wanted to search ASAP

The court sustains a nighttime search warrant based solely on the fact that there were some sales of drugs from the house without specifying the time, and that it was “urgent” that the raid happen now for drugs, potential weapons, … Continue reading →

Posted in Nighttime search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH2: Nighttime SW approved essentially just because police wanted to search ASAP

N.D.Ind.: Omitting CI’s criminal history wasn’t a Franks violation where it was obvious he was involved in criminal activity

Omission of the CI’s prior convictions wasn’t material for Franks purposes. It was obvious he was helping himself out in making penal admissions, and his credibility was otherwise shown. The issuing magistrate would have still issued the warrant. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Omitting CI’s criminal history wasn’t a Franks violation where it was obvious he was involved in criminal activity

techdirt: FBI And DOJ Personnel Confirm Agents Frequently Fudge Facts When Seeking FISA Warrants

techdirt: FBI And DOJ Personnel Confirm Agents Frequently Fudge Facts When Seeking FISA Warrants by Tim Cushing:

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on techdirt: FBI And DOJ Personnel Confirm Agents Frequently Fudge Facts When Seeking FISA Warrants

NE: Inventory wasn’t pretext for investigation; body cam video showed how it was done, and written policy could be testified to

Defendant’s vehicle was lawfully impounded, as it would have been in any event, and then it was inventoried. The state’s failure to put the inventory policy into evidence was not fatal because there was testimony about it. The inventory search … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on NE: Inventory wasn’t pretext for investigation; body cam video showed how it was done, and written policy could be testified to

DE: A few questions unrelated to the purpose of the stop didn’t measurably extend it

Questions asked of defendant that were unrelated to the justification for his traffic stop did not measurably extend the traffic stop. Although an officer’s questions about defendant’s two cell phones, children and the beach were unrelated to defendant’s failure to … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: A few questions unrelated to the purpose of the stop didn’t measurably extend it

OR: Def’s driving to a controlled buy was PC for automobile exception; not a “police-created exigency”

Police had probable cause to stop defendant on his way to a controlled buy. This did not qualify as a “police-created exigency.” State v. Colman-Pinning, 302 Ore. App. 383 (Feb. 26, 2020). Appellant “seeks appellate relief based on a single … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception | Comments Off on OR: Def’s driving to a controlled buy was PC for automobile exception; not a “police-created exigency”

D.C.: PC for SW moots standing dispute

Defendant claimed in post-conviction that his defense counsel was ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress for lack of standing and inability to undermine the showing of probable cause. It’s unclear what defendant told his lawyer about the facts … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Standing | Comments Off on D.C.: PC for SW moots standing dispute

NYTimes: When the Police Stop a Teenager With Special Needs

NYTimes: When the Police Stop a Teenager With Special Needs by  Michele C. Hollow (“People with autism or other special needs may repeat words, avoid eye contact and run from authorities.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYTimes: When the Police Stop a Teenager With Special Needs

CA8: A home security system alarm is an invitation for a protective sweep when police see a broken window

A home security alarm went off signaling a burglary and police responded. Seeing a broken window, they could enter to conduct a protective sweep, and contraband in plain view could be seized. A cell phone was also seized and later … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA8: A home security system alarm is an invitation for a protective sweep when police see a broken window

D.Neb.: Def questioned in his front yard was effectively in custody for Miranda

Defendant questioned in his front yard was effectively in custody and should have been Mirandized. United States v. Leon, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32964 (D. Neb. Feb. 18, 2020):

Posted in Custody | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Def questioned in his front yard was effectively in custody for Miranda

WaPo: My car was in a hit-and-run. Then I learned it recorded the whole thing.

WaPo: My car was in a hit-and-run. Then I learned it recorded the whole thing. by Geoffrey A. Fowler (“The car is becoming a sentry, a chaperone, and a snitch”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: My car was in a hit-and-run. Then I learned it recorded the whole thing.

D.N.M.: A “manpower shortage” for seizure of possible evidence isn’t exigency without PC

Defendant consented to a search of his car and his hotel room, but not to a search of his guitar case in the room. Thinking there might be drugs there, the officer seized the guitar case to preserve the potential … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on D.N.M.: A “manpower shortage” for seizure of possible evidence isn’t exigency without PC

D.Idaho: Faint smell of MJ and “excessive nervousness” not RS

Faint smell of marijuana and nervousness was not reasonable suspicion. The court also doesn’t find the travel plans at all suspicious. United States v. Lee, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33091 (D. Idaho Feb. 25, 2020). Plaintiff’s nolo plea barred his … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Faint smell of MJ and “excessive nervousness” not RS

N.D.Ohio: An open container in a car is probable cause under the automobile exception to search for other open containers

An open container in a car is probable cause under the automobile exception to search for other open containers. In addition: “Here, Patrolmen Link and McClamroch had received information that a retaliatory shooting could occur near the location they stopped … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: An open container in a car is probable cause under the automobile exception to search for other open containers

N.D.Iowa: “Let’s step inside and talk for a second” did not lead to consent

“Let’s step inside and talk for a second” did not lead to consent. “Although the language itself implies some joint or equal action, it also implies some level of insistence. See Williams v. United States, 263 F.2d 487, 849 (D.C. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: “Let’s step inside and talk for a second” did not lead to consent

CA10: NCMEC’s receipt of suspected CP from AOL was subject to GFE

The good faith exception applies to NCMEC’s receipt of suspected child pornography from AOL from an account holder. NCMEC objectively relied upon a statute that had never been challenged before. United States v. Ackerman, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 5806 (10th … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA10: NCMEC’s receipt of suspected CP from AOL was subject to GFE