Author Archives: Hall

TX14: There has to be a fact dispute to get an art. 38.23(a) jury instruction on legality of search

“‘To raise a disputed fact issue warranting an article 38.23(a) jury instruction, there must be some affirmative evidence that puts the existence of that fact into question.’ Madden, 242 S.W.3d at 513. In other words, a cross examiner cannot create … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on TX14: There has to be a fact dispute to get an art. 38.23(a) jury instruction on legality of search

Reason: Grand Jury Indictments Paint a Picture of Deadly Deceit in Houston Narcotics Division

Reason: Grand Jury Indictments Paint a Picture of Deadly Deceit in Houston Narcotics Division by Jacob Sullum (“The charges, which grew out of a lethal 2019 raid based on a fraudulent search warrant affidavit, suggest that cops routinely built their … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Reason: Grand Jury Indictments Paint a Picture of Deadly Deceit in Houston Narcotics Division

CA1: Inventory was shown to be investigative; suppression affirmed

“All in all, it seems inescapable that the officers seized Del Rosario’s car so that they could search it for evidence of a crime, and that they later sought to justify the search by invoking the community-caretaking exception. And while … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on CA1: Inventory was shown to be investigative; suppression affirmed

W.D.N.Y.: USMJ’s credibility determination is entitled to deference

While review of the R&R is de novo, the USMJ’s credibility determination on a motion to suppress is still entitled to deference. United States v. Angulo-Gomez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137199 (W.D. N.Y. Aug. 3, 2020). The government argued that … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: USMJ’s credibility determination is entitled to deference

D.Nev.: Denial of medical care after arrest can be a 4A violation, but this doesn’t measure up

“To the extent Plaintiff is asserting a denial of medical care after his arrest, but before he arrived at the detention facility, district courts within the Ninth Circuit have held that law enforcement officers are required to provide objectively reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Denial of medical care after arrest can be a 4A violation, but this doesn’t measure up

CA3: Suspended DL arrest was valid despite fact it was later dismissed in state court

Defendant’s arrest for driving on a suspended license was valid and with probable cause despite the fact he later got the charge dismissed. Bahgat v. Twp. of E. Brunswick, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 24326 (3d Cir. Aug. 3, 2020). Officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Suspended DL arrest was valid despite fact it was later dismissed in state court

OH3: Collins v. Virginia not retroactive on post-conviction relief

Defendant’s claim that Collins v. Virginia applied on post-conviction is denied. The search was two years before Collins was decided, and trial and appeal were over by then. It isn’t retroactive to final cases. State v. Parsons, 2020-Ohio-3917, 2020 Ohio … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH3: Collins v. Virginia not retroactive on post-conviction relief

OH3: Unsigned SW still entitled to GFE

Even though the search warrant wasn’t signed in violation of the state rule, the good faith exception applies because the issuing judge found probable cause and said he issued the warrant. State v. Harrison, 2020-Ohio-3920, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2821 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH3: Unsigned SW still entitled to GFE

Bloomberg Law: Protester Surveillance May Test Constitutional Privacy in Courts

Bloomberg Law: Protester Surveillance May Test Constitutional Privacy in Courts by Julia Weng & Daniel R. Stoller:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: Protester Surveillance May Test Constitutional Privacy in Courts

CA11: A cell phone with 2kg of heroin and cash is PC for the phone

“[L]aw enforcement officers had probable cause to obtain a warrant to search the cell phone because it was found in a truck with two kilograms of heroin and $24,000 of loose currency during the investigation into the heroin-distribution conspiracy.” CoA … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA11: A cell phone with 2kg of heroin and cash is PC for the phone

CA6: Failure to object to USMJ’s R&R is waiver of 4A claim

Defendant waived his Fourth Amendment challenge to his stop and frisk by not objecting to the USMJ’s R&R. United States v. Smith, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 24261 (6th Cir. July 31, 2020). Defendant doesn’t show any plausible basis for defense … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Failure to object to USMJ’s R&R is waiver of 4A claim

NV: Booking inventory invalid for lack of inventory and officer’s lack of memory of doing it

The booking inventory of defendant’s “bag” was invalid because of a lack of true inventory. The booking officer didn’t list what was in it because there was just too much stuff. Moreover, at the suppression hearing, she didn’t recall even … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on NV: Booking inventory invalid for lack of inventory and officer’s lack of memory of doing it

E.D.Wash.: Connecting seized cell phone to internet not a search

Connecting already seized cell phone to the internet was not shown to be a search (citing no law). United States v. Murray, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136292 (E.D. Wash. July 2, 2020). 2255 claim that defense counsel was ineffective for … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: Connecting seized cell phone to internet not a search

WaPo: Data isn’t just being collected from your phone. It’s being used to score you.

WaPo: Data isn’t just being collected from your phone. It’s being used to score you. by Harvey Rosenfield & Laura Antonini (“Operating in the shadows of the online marketplace, specialized tech companies you’ve likely never heard of are tapping vast … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Data isn’t just being collected from your phone. It’s being used to score you.

NY Times: Why a Data Breach at a Genealogy Site Has Privacy Experts Worried

NY Times: Why a Data Breach at a Genealogy Site Has Privacy Experts Worried by Heather Murphy (“Nearly two-thirds of GEDmatch’s users opt out of helping law enforcement. For a brief window this month, that didn’t matter.”):

Posted in DNA, Informational privacy | Comments Off on NY Times: Why a Data Breach at a Genealogy Site Has Privacy Experts Worried

CA7: Violation of police dept regulations can’t reasonably be a § 1983 claim or 4A violation

Violation of department violations can’t reasonably be a § 1983 claim or violation of the Fourth Amendment. Estate of Biegert v. Molitor, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 24211 (7th Cir. July 31, 2020):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Violation of police dept regulations can’t reasonably be a § 1983 claim or 4A violation

IN: Def counsel’s not filing a motion to suppress was strategic for plea purposes, not because of conflict

Defendant claimed defense counsel had a conflict of interest in not filing a motion to suppress because counsel also represented defendant’s wife. Their interests were identical in the case. The decision not to pursue the motion was to secure a … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on IN: Def counsel’s not filing a motion to suppress was strategic for plea purposes, not because of conflict

TX1: SW to seize blood sample implicitly means it can be tested, too

A search warrant for a blood sample implicitly includes testing it. Davis v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 5990 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) July 30, 2020). Probable cause existed for seizure of five years of defendant’s Gmail account. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Overseizure, Staleness | Comments Off on TX1: SW to seize blood sample implicitly means it can be tested, too

SC: Unzipped pants in traffic stop contributed to RS

“Because we must evaluate the trial court’s findings for clear error, we reluctantly conclude evidence supported the trial court’s finding the officer had reasonable suspicion to extend the stop.” Partly from unzipped pants which suggests to the officer hiding drugs … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on SC: Unzipped pants in traffic stop contributed to RS

CA10: Shooting of decedent when he raised a gun at his arrest appears justified

When officers, including the SWAT team, came to arrest the decedent, he had a gun in hand and raised it. He was already known to be potentially violent, and the shooting was reasonable under the circumstances. Estate of Valverde v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Shooting of decedent when he raised a gun at his arrest appears justified