CA6: Failure to object to USMJ’s R&R is waiver of 4A claim

Defendant waived his Fourth Amendment challenge to his stop and frisk by not objecting to the USMJ’s R&R. United States v. Smith, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 24261 (6th Cir. July 31, 2020).

Defendant doesn’t show any plausible basis for defense counsel to have moved to suppress the search warrant for his email accounts. Anthony v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136125 (D. Ariz. July 30, 2020).*

Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not challenging the probable cause supporting a search warrant when there actually was probable cause. United States v. Clark, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136325 (D. Minn. July 31, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Standards of review. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.