Author Archives: Hall

UT: DNA SW can be executed by force; def has burden of showing unreasonable force was used to execute a DNA warrant on his person

A search warrant was issued for defendant’s DNA, and he resisted efforts to take it by buccal swab. He doesn’t challenge the probable cause, only the method of execution. He carries the burden of proof on the question of unreasonableness … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, DNA, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on UT: DNA SW can be executed by force; def has burden of showing unreasonable force was used to execute a DNA warrant on his person

WI: Resident called 911 because of blood in garage; search that found body was reasonable under emergency aid exception

Another resident of the home called 911 because of a large amount of blood in the garage. They arrived and looked for the source, finding a body. Defendant was ultimately arrested. Although Caniglia v. Strom was decided after the briefs … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on WI: Resident called 911 because of blood in garage; search that found body was reasonable under emergency aid exception

Engadget: The Treasury Department is buying sensitive app data for investigations

Engadget: The Treasury Department is buying sensitive app data for investigations by Jon Fingas (“There are concerns investigators are bypassing due process” and the Fourth Amendment. This isn’t new information.)

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Engadget: The Treasury Department is buying sensitive app data for investigations

W.D.N.Y.: That DNA should have been expunged and wasn’t doesn’t mandate suppression under 4A

DNA that should have been expunged and wasn’t isn’t subject to suppression under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Green, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212916 (W.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2021):

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: That DNA should have been expunged and wasn’t doesn’t mandate suppression under 4A

W.D.N.Y.: Failure to preserve a recording of issuance of a SW required by NY law is not a 4A issue

Failure to preserve a recording of issuance of a search warrant as required by New York law is not a Fourth Amendment issue. United States v. Bailey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212869 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2021). “Recognizing that this case … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Computer and cloud searches, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Failure to preserve a recording of issuance of a SW required by NY law is not a 4A issue

M.D.Pa.: Status as “protector” of home although not occupant or guest not enough for standing

Defendant’s creative argument that he was a “protector” of the home although he wasn’t the owner or occupant and was only an occasional guest is rejected for the day in question. “Royal argues that he had a reasonable expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Status as “protector” of home although not occupant or guest not enough for standing

W.D.Ky.: Fireman jumping through def’s car window to stop him was unjustified and a search and seizure

A volunteer fireman diving into defendant’s car to keep him from driving away was a search and seizure. And, the community caretaking function did not apply. “Here, Wahl lacked any specific and articulable facts that Fairrow would be dangerous to … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Fireman jumping through def’s car window to stop him was unjustified and a search and seizure

GA: Probationer was unreasonably detained as suspect in a crime where he didn’t match

The state failed in its burden of proof that defendant was lawfully stopped and then detained as a possible suspect in a crime even though he was a probationer. His clothing didn’t match. It was prolonged way past its justification. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Probationer was unreasonably detained as suspect in a crime where he didn’t match

LATimes: L.A. sheriff’s deputies use minor stops to search bicyclists, with Latinos hit hardest

LATimes: L.A. sheriff’s deputies use minor stops to search bicyclists, with Latinos hit hardest by Alene Tchekmedyian, Ben Poston and Julia Barajas (“The Times’ analysis of more than 44,000 bike stops logged by the Sheriff’s Department since 2017 found that … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on LATimes: L.A. sheriff’s deputies use minor stops to search bicyclists, with Latinos hit hardest

SCOTUS grant: Bivens and excessive force

Egbert v. Boule, 21-147 (granted Nov. 5, 2021): Issues: (1) Whether a cause of action exists under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics for First Amendment retaliation claims; and (2) whether a cause of action … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS grant: Bivens and excessive force

E.D.Mich.: Laptop computer left in the former marital home for a decade is abandoned

A laptop computer left in the former marital home for a decade is abandoned property. United States v. Hartley, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212137 (E.D.Mich. Nov. 3, 2021). Petitioner seeks to bring five claims in a successor habeas petition, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Laptop computer left in the former marital home for a decade is abandoned

CA1: On a Franks claim based on omissions, add them in and retest for PC

With a Franks claim based on omissions, the court can consider the omissions and, if probable cause remains, the motion to suppress is denied. United States v. Leonard, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 32740 (1st Cir. Nov. 3, 2021). “Here, viewing … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA1: On a Franks claim based on omissions, add them in and retest for PC

IA: No REP in attorney call from interrogation room

Defendant’s in-custody call to his attorney was overheard by the recording system in the room. There was no reasonable expectation of privacy where it was made. Luthi v. Neis, 2021 Iowa App. LEXIS 930 (Nov. 3, 2021). The trial court … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: No REP in attorney call from interrogation room

PA: Def driving from Delaware to Philly for cheesesteaks when he was broke added to RS

Driving from Delaware to Philadelphia to get cheesesteaks while the driver professing he can’t afford a speeding ticket with a few other “dubious” comments leads to reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. The trial court erred in suppressing. Commonwealth v. … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Def driving from Delaware to Philly for cheesesteaks when he was broke added to RS

CA9 & OR: Merely citing 4A without substantive argument is waiver

“Plaintiffs forfeited their Fourth Amendment qualified immunity arguments because the opening brief makes no legal argument that qualified immunity does not apply, nor is such an argument apparent from Plaintiffs’ factual recitation.” Ramirez v. Zimmerman, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 32726 … Continue reading →

Posted in Waiver | Comments Off on CA9 & OR: Merely citing 4A without substantive argument is waiver

NJ: Flagrant knock-and-announce violation requires suppression under state constitution

A flagrant violation of the knock-and-announce rule violates the state constitution and the result is excluded. Violating the knock-and-announce requirement makes the search warrantless. The court recognizes the Fourth Amendment rule is contra. State v. Caronna, 2021 N.J. Super. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, State constitution | Comments Off on NJ: Flagrant knock-and-announce violation requires suppression under state constitution

Lawfare: The Impact of Carpenter v. United States in the Lower Courts and the Emerging Carpenter Test

Lawfare: The Impact of Carpenter v. United States in the Lower Courts and the Emerging Carpenter Test by Matthew Tokson:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Lawfare: The Impact of Carpenter v. United States in the Lower Courts and the Emerging Carpenter Test

D.Mont.: “‘Humpty Dumpty’ rule of meaning” of exigency?

Police entry for a drug overdose is an exigency. United States v. Van Pelt, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211734 (D.Mont. Nov. 2, 2021). And there’s this:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Mont.: “‘Humpty Dumpty’ rule of meaning” of exigency?

AR: Knock on door during visit to ask about a missing person lawfully resulted in plain view of blood spot on porch

While looking for a missing person with connection to defendant, police went to his place to talk to him. The officer knocked on his door but got no answer. As he turned to leave, he saw a spot of blood … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on AR: Knock on door during visit to ask about a missing person lawfully resulted in plain view of blood spot on porch

CA9: State’s seeking CSLI with PC but under wrong statute not 4A violation

Probable cause was shown for CSLI before the state judge, but the state sought the order under the wrong statute. That doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Fregia, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 32587 (9th Cir. Nov. 2, 2021). … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: State’s seeking CSLI with PC but under wrong statute not 4A violation