Author Archives: Hall

CA3: Def’s not showing himself for 5-6 minutes when police entered on an arrest warrant justified protective sweep

Police executed an arrest warrant at defendant’s house. It took him 5-6 minutes to show himself, coming from the basement. A protective sweep of the basement was reasonable, and firearms were found in plain view down there. A search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA3: Def’s not showing himself for 5-6 minutes when police entered on an arrest warrant justified protective sweep

E.D.N.Y.: Complaint about co-def’s cell phone search was “specious,” and def doesn’t even have standing

Defendant’s claim the information about a co-conspirator’s phone search must be fabricated because that search warrant wasn’t in his discovery was “specious.” He doesn’t even have standing. Edwards v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14407 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2022).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Complaint about co-def’s cell phone search was “specious,” and def doesn’t even have standing

M.D.Fla.: Cell phone calls with co-conspirator was PC for phone, and GFE applies anyway

Defendant was indicted in Florida for endangered species trafficking, occurring partly in California and Florida. The fact he talked 186 minutes with a co-conspirator over a year was probable cause to search his phone for evidence. Also, the good faith … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Cell phone calls with co-conspirator was PC for phone, and GFE applies anyway

CA1: DoJ MMJ appropriations rider does not implicate the exclusionary rule

The DoJ appropriations rider* that limits spending any federal funds of medical marijuana-type cases does not permit the court of appeals enjoining the prosecution by interlocutory appeal. That does not implicate the grand jury’s power to consider the case, nor … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA1: DoJ MMJ appropriations rider does not implicate the exclusionary rule

CA9: IRS didn’t coerce consent, def was advised of rights in writing

“To prove a Fourth Amendment violation, Orrock needed to show by clear and convincing evidence that an IRS agent induced a consent search by deceit, trickery, or an affirmative misrepresentation. … No IRS agent made an affirmative misrepresentation. Rather, Orrock … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CA9: IRS didn’t coerce consent, def was advised of rights in writing

TX: Pet’r gets remand over alleged pattern of lies elsewhere of one officer on SW application

Petitioner gets remand and a hearing that a police officer caught in lies on multiple search warrant applications around the same time could have here, too. Ex parte Mathews, 2022 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 36 (Jan. 26, 2022). Defendant’s father … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX: Pet’r gets remand over alleged pattern of lies elsewhere of one officer on SW application

D.Nev.: Def’s Facebook posts he was selling fake IDs gave PC to search it

An officer found defendant selling fake IDs via Facebook. “The Facebook Warrant contained posts from this account indicating that the account-operator was selling fake IDs, including by specifying that the IDs could help people avoid warrants, fines, and jail time. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Social media warrants, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def’s Facebook posts he was selling fake IDs gave PC to search it

CA2: MLAT treaty search of Netherlands server was a foreign search

El Chapo’s case: The district court was correct in not suppressing telephone calls on a drug cartel network set up in the Netherlands to facilitate their drug trafficking. The information was obtained by an MLAT treaty request, and it was … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Foreign searches, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA2: MLAT treaty search of Netherlands server was a foreign search

E.D.Pa.: Govt’s post-trial concession search was illegal undermines half the counts of conviction, and no harmless error on remainder

The government concedes after conviction on seven counts that three of the counts against defendant were the product of an illegal search. They argue the remainder can stand without it. It can’t because, if there was any doubt for any … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Govt’s post-trial concession search was illegal undermines half the counts of conviction, and no harmless error on remainder

Cal.3: Warrantless seizure of car to get a warrant for it was without PC and search suppressed

In this murder case, officers had a search warrant for defendant’s house and any cars on the property. They learned he had another car at a ranch of a friend. They entered the friend’s property and seized the car and … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent | Comments Off on Cal.3: Warrantless seizure of car to get a warrant for it was without PC and search suppressed

CA11: FBI’s negligence in taking six months to search def’s truck and computers did not require suppression

“Bruce Nicholson, an Alabama man convicted of federal child sex crimes and sentenced to life in prison, challenges his conviction on direct appeal. The main question in this criminal appeal is, as it often is, whether a criminal should ‘go … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Social media warrants | Comments Off on CA11: FBI’s negligence in taking six months to search def’s truck and computers did not require suppression

E.D.Wis.: Inventory was unreasonable where SOP didn’t mention inventory for overtinting and cash found wasn’t inventoried but was instead delivered to DEA

Even assuming that a tow and inventory is permissible for an illegal tint violation (comparing Atwater v. Lago Vista on trivial arrests not being unreasonable), the inventory police did not address such incidents and the inventory itself mentioned “backpack” without … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Inventory was unreasonable where SOP didn’t mention inventory for overtinting and cash found wasn’t inventoried but was instead delivered to DEA

NJ: Race and being ¾ mile from a robbery not RS

Defendants were stopped in a car ¾ of a mile and driving away from the scene of a 7-11 robbery. All the officer knew was there were two black males involved. In their car, there were three black males. That … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Race and being ¾ mile from a robbery not RS

NY1: Routine of leaving out of affidavit for SW that protective sweep saw drugs first revealed during trial required hearing

During the trial, NYPD officers revealed they were in the premises and conducted plain views during a walk around as a protective sweep and then sought a search warrant . It was also revealed that they routinely left information about … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NY1: Routine of leaving out of affidavit for SW that protective sweep saw drugs first revealed during trial required hearing

D.Neb.: Mid-trial Franks motion based on testimony still fails

Defendant filed and lost a Franks motion. He renewed it mid-trial after testimony. This one fares no better. It’s based on a claim defense counsel should have interviewed the witness earlier for the Franks motion, but all this is speculative. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Mid-trial Franks motion based on testimony still fails

Yahoo Finance: Tucked Inside Biden Infrastructure Bill: Unconstitutional Crypto Surveillance

Yahoo Finance: Tucked Inside Biden Infrastructure Bill: Unconstitutional Crypto Surveillance by Marta Belcher:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Yahoo Finance: Tucked Inside Biden Infrastructure Bill: Unconstitutional Crypto Surveillance

W.D.Tex.: Writ of error coram nobis not a remedy nor timely for evidentiary claim in 2013 suppression hearing

Defendant’s petition for writ of error coram nobis is denied as untimely, even if available at all. The claim was authentication of warrant papers as an exhibit in 2013. That’s not even a basis for the writ. He was charged … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Writ of error coram nobis not a remedy nor timely for evidentiary claim in 2013 suppression hearing

D.S.C.: On a 4th motion to keep SW materials under seal, granted for another year

On this fourth motion to extend deadline, the warrant materials here are ordered sealed for another year because of an ongoing investigation. The court finds redactions aren’t reasonably possible. In re Seized Misc. United States Currency, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.S.C.: On a 4th motion to keep SW materials under seal, granted for another year

CA3: Def’s immigration detention was not an egregious 4A violation

Defendant was involved in an immigration stop where officers were looking for another person allegedly illegally reentering. After finding he was not the person they were looking for, they tried to confirm his identity, and the detention might have been … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA3: Def’s immigration detention was not an egregious 4A violation

CA7: Record supported finding that stop was not unreasonably extended

Whether a traffic stop was unreasonably extended for a drug dog to arrive is reviewed for clear error. The stop here was for overtinting, and the officer processed a warning by entering the information into the patrol car’s computer. He … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA7: Record supported finding that stop was not unreasonably extended