Daily Archives: June 26, 2023

CA4: Search of unlocked van with door ajar left overnight on bank parking lot with visible assault rifle was reasonable under community caretaking function

A bank employee saw a van parked on the bank’s lot that had been there overnight. Officers responded and saw an assault rifle in the passenger compartment. “Around 12:30 [p.m.], without knocking or announcing their presence, Lambert and Wagner pulled … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Search of unlocked van with door ajar left overnight on bank parking lot with visible assault rifle was reasonable under community caretaking function

W.D.Tenn.: Officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target

Law enforcement officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target. “However, in reviewing a search warrant for probable cause, a court is ‘to look holistically at what the affidavit does show, instead … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target

CA11: Magistrate who came to the scene to sign SW was still neutral and detached

The issuing magistrate was still neutral and detached. He came to the location of the search to assist in getting the warrant issued, but he stayed away from the building and signed the paperwork. He did not get involved or … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on CA11: Magistrate who came to the scene to sign SW was still neutral and detached

NJ: Smell of mj in the passenger compartment doesn’t justify search of trunk or engine compartment

Where the officer smelled marijuana in the passenger compartment and searched for it finding nothing, a search of the engine compartment and trunk was excessive under the automobile exception. From the syllabus : “Expanding the search to the engine compartment … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on NJ: Smell of mj in the passenger compartment doesn’t justify search of trunk or engine compartment

E.D.Mich.: Failure to file SW return doesn’t require suppression

Failure to file the warrant return doesn’t require suppression. It’s a curable ministerial act. Besides, the defendant can’t show prejudice. As to the merits, the search warrant was issued with probable cause and the good faith exception applies in any … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Staleness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Failure to file SW return doesn’t require suppression

C.D.Cal.: Defense counsel can’t make a false argument belied by evidence the govt. agreed to suppress

Defense counsel’s closing argument that was flatly contradicted by evidence the government elected to not put in in response to a motion to suppress maybe could have come in. Defense counsel can’t make a false argument to the jury without … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Defense counsel can’t make a false argument belied by evidence the govt. agreed to suppress

M.D.Ala.: Address alone isn’t enough to confer standing in a mailed package; name on it has to be yours

Defendant wasn’t shown as an addressee of this package, but it was sent to his address. That alone doesn’t give him standing. United States v. Roberts, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107828 (M.D. Ala. May 18, 2023), adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Address alone isn’t enough to confer standing in a mailed package; name on it has to be yours

IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

“In contrast, here the State established that Maverick was a certified drug sniffing dog with a history of reliability. Maverick’s behavior, even without a full final response of sitting, was sufficient to indicate that he had detected the odors of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

MI: Terry justified this search and seizure, not plain feel

The court of appeals erred in not applying Terry to this frisk inside defendant’s coat, instead relying on plain feel. Remanded. People v. Turner, 2023 Mich. LEXIS 937 (June 21, 2023). “Here, the warrant specifically identified the offenses for which … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Terry justified this search and seizure, not plain feel

DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means

The search warrant might appear general, but it was limited by the things to be searched for. The reference to “trace evidence including but not limited to blood, hair, fibers, fluids, and fingerprints” did not make it unparticular. Trace evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means