Monthly Archives: February 2020

Reason: Bivens Liability and Its Alternatives

Reason: Bivens Liability and Its Alternatives by Will Baude (“If the Court is going to abolish the 20th century remedies, can we at least have the 19th century remedies back?”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reason: Bivens Liability and Its Alternatives

W.D.Mo.: Inventory for tow after def was taken to hospital was clearly only for community caretaking and not investigation

Defendant was injured in a vehicle accident, and he didn’t respond to the officer’s request about a private tow. The officer arranged a tow, and his inventory of the car was clearly based on the community caretaking function and not … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Inventory for tow after def was taken to hospital was clearly only for community caretaking and not investigation

TX8: Def has no standing to complain of writ of attachment on a witness

“[W]e conclude that Fernandez made no showing at trial of an invasion of his own rights to establish he had standing to complain of the State’s use of the writ of attachment to secure the attendance for trial of complaining … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on TX8: Def has no standing to complain of writ of attachment on a witness

NH: When an overdose call is made to 911, it isn’t unreasonable for a police officer to enter with EMTs or the FD

When an overdose call is made to 911, it isn’t unreasonable for a police officer to enter with EMTs or the fire department. State v. Eldridge, 2020 N.H. LEXIS 18 (Feb. 19. 2020):

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NH: When an overdose call is made to 911, it isn’t unreasonable for a police officer to enter with EMTs or the FD

E.D.Ky.: Inviting in a CI unknowingly wearing an audio-visual recording device violates no REP

Inviting in a CI unknowingly wearing an audio-visual recording device violates no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Hight, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30546 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 24, 2020):

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Inviting in a CI unknowingly wearing an audio-visual recording device violates no REP

D.Nev.: Affidavit for SW for DNA showed PC by parallels between two crimes and def

“The underlying facts in the affidavit compare the actions of Tualua with the actions of the people who committed the prior EZ Pawn robberies, which would allow the issuing judge to make his or her own conclusions. Under the totality … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, DNA | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Affidavit for SW for DNA showed PC by parallels between two crimes and def

WaPo: ICE runs facial-recognition searches on millions of Md. drivers, alarming immigration and privacy activists

WaPo: ICE runs facial-recognition searches on millions of Md. drivers, alarming immigration and privacy activists by Drew Harwell and Erin Cox (“Maryland defied federal guidelines in 2013 when it created driver’s licenses for undocumented immigrants. But in recent years, Immigration … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: ICE runs facial-recognition searches on millions of Md. drivers, alarming immigration and privacy activists

PR: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require every officer to know everything

The collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require every officer to know everything. Pueblo  v. Jiméne, 2020 PR App. LEXIS 278 (P.R. App. Jan. 30, 2020). (That, of course, is evident from the word “collective.”). A year typo in the affidavit’s narrative … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge | Comments Off on PR: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require every officer to know everything

M.D.Tenn.: Single trash pull at a duplex with one trash container was still PC and nexus

A single trash pull that produced some evidence of limited possession at a duplex with one trash container was still probable cause with nexus to defendant. United States v. Hogan, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30039 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 21, 2020). … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Single trash pull at a duplex with one trash container was still PC and nexus

TX11: Automobile exception doesn’t permit a vehicle search after the object of the search has been recovered

The automobile exception did not apply where defendant was stopped for an alleged theft and the property was recovered before the search occurred, thereby obviating it. State v. Whitman, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 1481 (Tex. App. – Eastland Feb. 21, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on TX11: Automobile exception doesn’t permit a vehicle search after the object of the search has been recovered

ID: DL was not seized for warrants check; officer asked to see it and then write info off it, then it was returned

The officer did not seize defendant’s license to conduct a warrant check. In a consensual encounter, he asked to see it then he asked if he could write the information down. He did and handed it back. He later ran … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: DL was not seized for warrants check; officer asked to see it and then write info off it, then it was returned

CA3: Border search exception applies to VI traveler, headed no matter which way

The border search exception applies to travel to and from the Virgin Islands, no matter which way the traveler is going. United States v. Baxter, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 5341 (3d Cir. Feb. 21, 2020). Detention center officer’s two-handed shove … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA3: Border search exception applies to VI traveler, headed no matter which way

D.N.M.: SWs are seldom perfect; the question is where there is a reasonable belief in facts supporting a search

“The process of obtaining a search warrant exists to ensure that officers first gather sufficient facts indicating criminal activity before scouring through private property. Though search warrants are not always perfect or as specific as courts might like, the process … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: SWs are seldom perfect; the question is where there is a reasonable belief in facts supporting a search

Security Boulevard: Personal Data Collection: Outsourcing Surveillance

Security Boulevard: Personal Data Collection: Outsourcing Surveillance by Mark Rasch (“The buying and selling of personal data means more entities are able to conduct surveillance without needing a warrant”)

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Security Boulevard: Personal Data Collection: Outsourcing Surveillance

E.D.Mich.: Navarette-like stop was reasonable in shots fired call and that also supported vehicle search for weapon under Long

“Navarette supports a finding of reasonable suspicion here. In light of the totality of the circumstances, including that officers spotted the white pickup in close proximity to the park soon after being dispatched, the court finds that the 911 call … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Navarette-like stop was reasonable in shots fired call and that also supported vehicle search for weapon under Long

CA1: Def lacked standing to challenge search of a shed actually done under authority of bail condition

Defendant was stopped by officers with “beyond” reasonable suspicion he was dealing drugs. The stop was not unreasonably long, and defendant incriminated himself pre-Miranda. Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of a shed. The justification for the search was … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA1: Def lacked standing to challenge search of a shed actually done under authority of bail condition

CA1: Alleged overseizure of email under SW would only require partial suppression; def doesn’t identify that which was overseized

Defendant’s motion to suppress electronic data acquired by a Rule 41(e)(2)(B) search warrant on his email account was properly denied. Based on the absence of a time limit in the warrant, it was not unreasonable to interpret the warrant to … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Overseizure, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: Alleged overseizure of email under SW would only require partial suppression; def doesn’t identify that which was overseized

D.P.R.: Franks motion that only sets up a “swearing match” for witnesses is inadequate

Defendant’s unsworn motion for a Franks hearing fails to identify the materiality of the alleged misstatement and that it was knowingly false. Setting up a “swearing match” for a hearing doesn’t satisfy Franks. United States v. Figueroa-Rivera, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Franks motion that only sets up a “swearing match” for witnesses is inadequate

TX9: Witness and ADAs allegedly providing false information for SWs are absolutely immune from civil cases

Witnesses who had provided affidavits in the underlying criminal case were entitled to absolute witness immunity, regardless of whether they gave false testimony. Prosecutors in that case who allegedly participated in falsifying evidence and writing a perjured search warrant were … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX9: Witness and ADAs allegedly providing false information for SWs are absolutely immune from civil cases

IEEE Spectrum: AI Deception: When Your Artificial Intelligence Learns to Lie

IEEE Spectrum: AI Deception: When Your Artificial Intelligence Learns to Lie by Heather Roff (“We need to understand the kinds of deception an AI agent may learn on its own before we can start proposing technological defenses”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on IEEE Spectrum: AI Deception: When Your Artificial Intelligence Learns to Lie