Daily Archives: February 24, 2020

techdirt: Ring Continues To Pitch Facial Recognition To Law Enforcement While Claiming It Won’t Be Adding Facial Recognition To Its Cameras

techdirt: Ring Continues To Pitch Facial Recognition To Law Enforcement While Claiming It Won’t Be Adding Facial Recognition To Its Cameras by Tim Cushing (“Ring continues to insist it is not adding facial recognition to its sadly super-popular doorbell cameras. … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on techdirt: Ring Continues To Pitch Facial Recognition To Law Enforcement While Claiming It Won’t Be Adding Facial Recognition To Its Cameras

Vox: The police want your phone data. Here’s what they can get — and what they can’t.

Vox: The police want your phone data. Here’s what they can get — and what they can’t. By Sara Morrison (“Phones hold gigabytes of potential evidence, but the government’s ability to access them depends on a patchwork of court decisions … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Digital privacy | Comments Off on Vox: The police want your phone data. Here’s what they can get — and what they can’t.

Lawfare: Do Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment?

Lawfare: Do Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment? by Nathaniel Sobel:

Posted in Tracking warrant | Comments Off on Lawfare: Do Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment?

17th anniversary of this blog; 259th anniversary of Otis’ argument in Paxton’s Case

Today is the 17th anniversary of this blog. Today is also the 259th anniversary of James Otis’ 1761 argument at the Boston Old State House against the writs of assistance in Paxton’s Case. Transcripts of the argument are here. (It … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on 17th anniversary of this blog; 259th anniversary of Otis’ argument in Paxton’s Case