Category Archives: Inevitable discovery

N.D.Ga.: Govt bore burden of proof on inevitable discovery and failed; weak hearsay not credited

The issue of inevitable discovery was treated as an aside by the government, although it bore the burden of proof on it. It seeks the use of hearsay on inevitable discovery that was hard to credit considering the posture of … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Govt bore burden of proof on inevitable discovery and failed; weak hearsay not credited

CA3: Hiding computer evidence when def learns SW coming is “contemporaneously with arrest” for U.S.S.G. 3C1.1

Defendant panicked when he heard the police were coming to his house to search, and he moved files to his computer recycling bin. The court finds this was “contemporaneously with arrest” for U.S.S.G. 3C1.1, but, because they were easily recovered, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA3: Hiding computer evidence when def learns SW coming is “contemporaneously with arrest” for U.S.S.G. 3C1.1

TX: Even if suppression motion is made in trial, state bears burden on a warrantless search

Whether a motion to suppress is filed pretrial or during trial, if the search is shown to be warrantless, the burden shifts to the state to prove the legality of the warrantless search. White v. State, 2018 Tex. Crim. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on TX: Even if suppression motion is made in trial, state bears burden on a warrantless search

E.D.N.Y.: Def’s search incident of his backpack for fraudulent use of a Metrocard was valid at least on GFE and inevitable discovery

Defendant was stopped for using a school student’s Metrocard to get on the NYC subway because he looked and was a so older. His backpacked was removed, and he was handcuffed. His backpack was searched incident to his arrest. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def’s search incident of his backpack for fraudulent use of a Metrocard was valid at least on GFE and inevitable discovery

CAAF: Inevitable discovery and lack of bad faith saved AFOSI’s exceeding scope of search authorization

AFOSI officers exceed the military search authorization which omitted defendant’s bags. They’d sought a search of the bags and it was within the confines of the affidavit. There was no bad faith, and they were actively investigating pursuing leads on … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CAAF: Inevitable discovery and lack of bad faith saved AFOSI’s exceeding scope of search authorization

E.D.Va.: Suit over opening medical records envelope as non-legal mail was frivolous

Suit over opening of non-legal mail, here medical records, was frivolous. Villafana v. Clarke, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54893 (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2018). The first officer at the scene conducted a search without probable cause. A supervising officer appeared … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Suit over opening medical records envelope as non-legal mail was frivolous

AF: Inevitable discovery validated finding CP while looking for text messages with minor

The search authorization was valid for text messages between defendant and a supposed 14-year-old girl. The AFOSI investigator found child pornography in what was thus found to be plain view. Even if, arguendo, the officer was looking for child pornography, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on AF: Inevitable discovery validated finding CP while looking for text messages with minor

ME: Entry on curtilage for “security check” just before SW issued was inevitable discovery

Officers arrested defendant’s housemate at a motel for attempting to buy oxycontin. Somehow, not described, this led to probable cause to search her house. While other officers were obtaining a search warrant, two officers went to the house for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on ME: Entry on curtilage for “security check” just before SW issued was inevitable discovery

N.D.Ohio: No IAC for not raising search issue that would lose on merits by inevitable discovery

“Nevertheless, Petitioner’s arguments for suppression do not succeed. [¶] This is because police ultimately found the firearm and ammunition from an independent source, thus defeating the need for suppression. Under the independent source doctrine, evidence that was ‘initially discovered during … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: No IAC for not raising search issue that would lose on merits by inevitable discovery

ID: Search of driver while waiting for confirmation of outstanding warrant suppressed; second search after finding it was valid; no inevitable discovery

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and it came back that there might be a warrant for him. Under state practice, the police then seek confirmation of the warrant before acting on it. Here, however, defendant was frisked incident … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Search of driver while waiting for confirmation of outstanding warrant suppressed; second search after finding it was valid; no inevitable discovery

CA8: Def has burden of showing illegal detention was “but for” cause of finding evidence

Defendant was a known drug dealer, and he was parked with his hood open. He said he was checking the belt on the engine. The officer was not prohibited from approaching the car and looking under the hood, too. Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA8: Def has burden of showing illegal detention was “but for” cause of finding evidence

D.S.D.: Inevitable discovery cures a Rodriguez violation

While extending the stop violated Rodriguez, inevitable discovery applies and the evidence is not suppressed. United States v. Conteh, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25542 (D. S.D. Feb. 16, 2018):

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Inevitable discovery cures a Rodriguez violation

E.D.Cal.: A civil detainee has no REP in his cell, despite not being a convict

A civil commitment detainee has more rights than a convict in a jail, but still practically none in his living area from a search for alleged contraband. Warrior v. Santiago, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22742 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2018). … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: A civil detainee has no REP in his cell, despite not being a convict

NE: Even if OnStar produced information the same day before the SW actually issued, inevitable discovery applies

Defendant claimed that the police obtained his OnStar information just before the search warrant for it issued. While that’s not conceded, it doesn’t matter because the search warrant was issued and the information retrieved the same day. Inevitable discovery applies, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on NE: Even if OnStar produced information the same day before the SW actually issued, inevitable discovery applies

ME: Inevitable discovery doctrine doesn’t provide an incentive for police misconduct

The drugs here would have been inevitably found one way or the other. The inevitable discovery rule doesn’t provide the police an incentive to not comply with Fourth Amendment protections. State v. Prinkleton, 2018 ME 16, 2018 Me. LEXIS 15 … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on ME: Inevitable discovery doctrine doesn’t provide an incentive for police misconduct

CA1: Inevitable discovery applies to patdown; safety ultimately justified it

The district court credited the testimony of the officer that the patdown was justified by legitimate safety concerns after he got inconsistent dates of birth from the passenger. While the patdown otherwise would have exceeded the scope of a lawful … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA1: Inevitable discovery applies to patdown; safety ultimately justified it

W.D.Mo.: Misreading a “hot sheet” for stop of a car was objectively reasonable mistake

Police had a “hot sheet,” a list of stolen cars from a car dealership, and were on the look out. “In this case, Officer Palmer believed that the red Dodge Challenger had been stolen from the dealership in Excelsior Springs, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Misreading a “hot sheet” for stop of a car was objectively reasonable mistake

N.D.Fla.: Entry into motel room was valid with arrest warrant when officers reasonably believed he would be there

The U.S. Marshal’s fugitive task force, with arrest warrant in hand, was looking for defendant. They were watching his motel room and saw him outside and gave chase. They lost sight of him and circled back to his hotel room … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Entry into motel room was valid with arrest warrant when officers reasonably believed he would be there

M.D.La.: Bench warrant surfacing for def made pat down legal by inevitable discovery even if frisk invalid

Officers responded to a wellness check and found two people passed out in a car. One couldn’t be roused, but defendant could and he was removed from the car and patted down for officer safety. The patdown was reasonable. Even … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Bench warrant surfacing for def made pat down legal by inevitable discovery even if frisk invalid

CA4: Inevitable discovery applies to def’s name

The district court did not err in finding the inevitable discovery doctrine applied where officers responded to an assault call and saw defendant, believed to be a felon, with a gun. It was inevitable that police would have lawfully discovered … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA4: Inevitable discovery applies to def’s name