Category Archives: Inevitable discovery

D.V.I.: Inevitable discovery fails here because the govt doesn’t show it was trying to get a SW

Inevitable discovery doesn’t apply here because there was no effort or even indication the government was going to get a search warrant. “Accordingly, while the Court finds that the inevitable discovery doctrine is potentially applicable to Wrensford’s DNA sample, it … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on D.V.I.: Inevitable discovery fails here because the govt doesn’t show it was trying to get a SW

N.D.W.Va.: Warrantless entry to prevent destruction of evidence pending SW was reasonable

A warrantless protective sweep before obtaining a search warrant to prevent possible destruction of evidence was reasonable. A search warrant was later obtained [inevitable discovery]. United States v. Beazel, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136901 (N.D. W.Va. Aug. 14, 2019).* The … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Warrantless entry to prevent destruction of evidence pending SW was reasonable

KS: Inevitable discovery not fully developed and remanded

Another case on inevitable discovery finds two of the three Brown factors satisfied. “Here, the officer discovered an arrest warrant that predated his encounter with Tatro. And Tatro has not argued the warrant was tainted, invalid, or related to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on KS: Inevitable discovery not fully developed and remanded

KS: The state has to plead inevitable discovery and allow a record to be made or it defaults it

All the factors of inevitable discovery favor suppression of the evidence, even under Strieff. Moreover, for the state to claim inevitable discovery, it has plead it in the trial court and allow a record to be made. State v. Sanders, … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on KS: The state has to plead inevitable discovery and allow a record to be made or it defaults it

CA10: SW for computer fraud revealed CP; inevitable discovery applied

While executing a computer fraud search warrant on defendant’s computers they happened upon child pornography on CDs during the onsite search. They took the computers and the CDs with the child pornography. A later search warrant was issued for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA10: SW for computer fraud revealed CP; inevitable discovery applied

D.R.I.: Officers don’t actually have to be applying for a SW for inevitable discovery to apply if they have PC

The court finds the consent to search given by a woman in the house was voluntary and wasn’t based on a threat to take her child away by DCYF. She drew that conclusion herself because she was concerned about it. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Officers don’t actually have to be applying for a SW for inevitable discovery to apply if they have PC

FL5: State’s failure to prove active pursuit of SW precluded reliance on inevitable discovery

The State failed to show that law enforcement was in pursuit of a search warrant at the time of the improper entry into defendant’s residence. It was thus error for the trial court to rely on the inevitable discovery doctrine … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on FL5: State’s failure to prove active pursuit of SW precluded reliance on inevitable discovery

E.D.Mich.: PC shown for records of the last number a murder victim called

Defendant’s cell phone number being the last number a murder victim called was at least a minimally sufficient basis for a search warrant for cell phone records to see who it was. It was also at least supported by the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC shown for records of the last number a murder victim called

CA6: Dist.Ct.’s findings don’t support inevitable discovery, so court applies independent source instead

The district court’s analysis doesn’t support application of the inevitable discovery exception because the court didn’t make sufficient findings on the second part of the test. Instead, the record fully supports the independent source doctrine instead. United States v. Chapman-Sexton, … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Inevitable discovery, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Dist.Ct.’s findings don’t support inevitable discovery, so court applies independent source instead

DE: Whether a state tracking warrant permits tracking in NJ is avoided in favor of inevitable discovery

A tracking device was put on defendant’s Jeep by warrant, and it was tracked into New Jersey as well. The court offers that it’s a difficult question whether the vehicle could be tracked in New Jersey too, but decides the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on DE: Whether a state tracking warrant permits tracking in NJ is avoided in favor of inevitable discovery

AK: Initial warrantless entry after attempted warrantless arrest, standoff, then arrest was saved by inevitable discovery with later warrant

Alaska State Troopers developed information that two men were involved in burglaries and travelled far to arrest them, albeit without a warrant. They ordered the men out of their rented cabin, and that would have been an illegal arrest, but … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on AK: Initial warrantless entry after attempted warrantless arrest, standoff, then arrest was saved by inevitable discovery with later warrant

FL2: Calling the DA to see about whether a SW was needed is not actively seeking a warrant for inevitable discovery purposes

The trial court erred in applying the inevitable discovery doctrine. The officer had probable cause to conduct the search of defendant’s laptop, but this was insufficient to justify the detective’s failure to obtain a warrant to search it. His call … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inevitable discovery, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on FL2: Calling the DA to see about whether a SW was needed is not actively seeking a warrant for inevitable discovery purposes

TX14: Two prior searches for blood constitutionally or statutorily didn’t need to be mentioned in affidavit for third

Defendant was in a car wreck that killed another at 1 am, New Years Day 2014. There were three blood draws: one for medical purposes at the hospital, one directed by the police at the hospital, and one after a … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on TX14: Two prior searches for blood constitutionally or statutorily didn’t need to be mentioned in affidavit for third

DE applies Carpenter to January CSLI search; no action yet on state’s effort to get it again after motion to suppress

Defendant was the subject of a CSLI warrant in January 2018. After he filed a motion to suppress under Carpenter decided in June, the state sought the same information by a search warrant in August 2018. Carpenter applies here. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on DE applies Carpenter to January CSLI search; no action yet on state’s effort to get it again after motion to suppress

GA: Search of a backpack six days after seizure required a SW

Defendant was granted a new murder trial on ineffective assistance of counsel grounds, one of which was failure to file a motion to suppress. On remand to the trial court, he pursued the motion to suppress claiming that a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on GA: Search of a backpack six days after seizure required a SW

OR: On a domestic call, “The officers heard a man say ‘shut the fuck up,’ a woman crying and whimpering, a loud thump, and then silence.” This was exigency

Police get a domestic call, and when they get there “The officers heard a man say ‘shut the fuck up,’ a woman crying and whimpering, a loud thump, and then silence.” This was enough for exigency for an entry. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on OR: On a domestic call, “The officers heard a man say ‘shut the fuck up,’ a woman crying and whimpering, a loud thump, and then silence.” This was exigency

CA9: Search of backpack was inevitable either as SITA or booking

Defendant was booked on two misdemeanors, and his backpack was searched. If his backpack wasn’t subject to a search incident, it was subject to inevitable discovery for a search at booking. Also, for what it’s worth, defendant twice attempted to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA9: Search of backpack was inevitable either as SITA or booking

FL1: Inevitable discovery requires actual effort to get SW or exception swallows rule

There was no attempt by the officers to secure a search warrant. Probable cause alone isn’t enough: there has to be an effort to get a warrant for inevitable discovery to apply. “Any other result would allow the exception to … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on FL1: Inevitable discovery requires actual effort to get SW or exception swallows rule

OR: There was no PC for an administrative seizure of def’s car

The seizure of defendant’s car was without probable cause for an administrative seizure. While her insurance card did not fully comply with the statute, it was fair on its face that it was her and for her cars. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on OR: There was no PC for an administrative seizure of def’s car

CA9: On remand for a hearing on inevitable discovery, the district court found it applied three ways

On remand from United States v. Harris, 642 Fed. Appx. 713 (9th Cir. 2016), the district court had a hearing on application of inevitable discovery. “At the supplemental hearing, the district court made three findings in determining that the inevitable … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA9: On remand for a hearing on inevitable discovery, the district court found it applied three ways