Category Archives: Inevitable discovery

E.D.Mich.: PC shown for records of the last number a murder victim called

Defendant’s cell phone number being the last number a murder victim called was at least a minimally sufficient basis for a search warrant for cell phone records to see who it was. It was also at least supported by the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC shown for records of the last number a murder victim called

CA6: Dist.Ct.’s findings don’t support inevitable discovery, so court applies independent source instead

The district court’s analysis doesn’t support application of the inevitable discovery exception because the court didn’t make sufficient findings on the second part of the test. Instead, the record fully supports the independent source doctrine instead. United States v. Chapman-Sexton, … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Inevitable discovery, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Dist.Ct.’s findings don’t support inevitable discovery, so court applies independent source instead

DE: Whether a state tracking warrant permits tracking in NJ is avoided in favor of inevitable discovery

A tracking device was put on defendant’s Jeep by warrant, and it was tracked into New Jersey as well. The court offers that it’s a difficult question whether the vehicle could be tracked in New Jersey too, but decides the … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on DE: Whether a state tracking warrant permits tracking in NJ is avoided in favor of inevitable discovery

AK: Initial warrantless entry after attempted warrantless arrest, standoff, then arrest was saved by inevitable discovery with later warrant

Alaska State Troopers developed information that two men were involved in burglaries and travelled far to arrest them, albeit without a warrant. They ordered the men out of their rented cabin, and that would have been an illegal arrest, but … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on AK: Initial warrantless entry after attempted warrantless arrest, standoff, then arrest was saved by inevitable discovery with later warrant

FL2: Calling the DA to see about whether a SW was needed is not actively seeking a warrant for inevitable discovery purposes

The trial court erred in applying the inevitable discovery doctrine. The officer had probable cause to conduct the search of defendant’s laptop, but this was insufficient to justify the detective’s failure to obtain a warrant to search it. His call … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inevitable discovery, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on FL2: Calling the DA to see about whether a SW was needed is not actively seeking a warrant for inevitable discovery purposes

TX14: Two prior searches for blood constitutionally or statutorily didn’t need to be mentioned in affidavit for third

Defendant was in a car wreck that killed another at 1 am, New Years Day 2014. There were three blood draws: one for medical purposes at the hospital, one directed by the police at the hospital, and one after a … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on TX14: Two prior searches for blood constitutionally or statutorily didn’t need to be mentioned in affidavit for third

DE applies Carpenter to January CSLI search; no action yet on state’s effort to get it again after motion to suppress

Defendant was the subject of a CSLI warrant in January 2018. After he filed a motion to suppress under Carpenter decided in June, the state sought the same information by a search warrant in August 2018. Carpenter applies here. The … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on DE applies Carpenter to January CSLI search; no action yet on state’s effort to get it again after motion to suppress

GA: Search of a backpack six days after seizure required a SW

Defendant was granted a new murder trial on ineffective assistance of counsel grounds, one of which was failure to file a motion to suppress. On remand to the trial court, he pursued the motion to suppress claiming that a search … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on GA: Search of a backpack six days after seizure required a SW

OR: On a domestic call, “The officers heard a man say ‘shut the fuck up,’ a woman crying and whimpering, a loud thump, and then silence.” This was exigency

Police get a domestic call, and when they get there “The officers heard a man say ‘shut the fuck up,’ a woman crying and whimpering, a loud thump, and then silence.” This was enough for exigency for an entry. State … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on OR: On a domestic call, “The officers heard a man say ‘shut the fuck up,’ a woman crying and whimpering, a loud thump, and then silence.” This was exigency

CA9: Search of backpack was inevitable either as SITA or booking

Defendant was booked on two misdemeanors, and his backpack was searched. If his backpack wasn’t subject to a search incident, it was subject to inevitable discovery for a search at booking. Also, for what it’s worth, defendant twice attempted to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA9: Search of backpack was inevitable either as SITA or booking

FL1: Inevitable discovery requires actual effort to get SW or exception swallows rule

There was no attempt by the officers to secure a search warrant. Probable cause alone isn’t enough: there has to be an effort to get a warrant for inevitable discovery to apply. “Any other result would allow the exception to … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on FL1: Inevitable discovery requires actual effort to get SW or exception swallows rule

OR: There was no PC for an administrative seizure of def’s car

The seizure of defendant’s car was without probable cause for an administrative seizure. While her insurance card did not fully comply with the statute, it was fair on its face that it was her and for her cars. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on OR: There was no PC for an administrative seizure of def’s car

CA9: On remand for a hearing on inevitable discovery, the district court found it applied three ways

On remand from United States v. Harris, 642 Fed. Appx. 713 (9th Cir. 2016), the district court had a hearing on application of inevitable discovery. “At the supplemental hearing, the district court made three findings in determining that the inevitable … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA9: On remand for a hearing on inevitable discovery, the district court found it applied three ways

N.D.Ga.: Govt bore burden of proof on inevitable discovery and failed; weak hearsay not credited

The issue of inevitable discovery was treated as an aside by the government, although it bore the burden of proof on it. It seeks the use of hearsay on inevitable discovery that was hard to credit considering the posture of … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Govt bore burden of proof on inevitable discovery and failed; weak hearsay not credited

CA3: Hiding computer evidence when def learns SW coming is “contemporaneously with arrest” for U.S.S.G. 3C1.1

Defendant panicked when he heard the police were coming to his house to search, and he moved files to his computer recycling bin. The court finds this was “contemporaneously with arrest” for U.S.S.G. 3C1.1, but, because they were easily recovered, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA3: Hiding computer evidence when def learns SW coming is “contemporaneously with arrest” for U.S.S.G. 3C1.1

TX: Even if suppression motion is made in trial, state bears burden on a warrantless search

Whether a motion to suppress is filed pretrial or during trial, if the search is shown to be warrantless, the burden shifts to the state to prove the legality of the warrantless search. White v. State, 2018 Tex. Crim. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on TX: Even if suppression motion is made in trial, state bears burden on a warrantless search

E.D.N.Y.: Def’s search incident of his backpack for fraudulent use of a Metrocard was valid at least on GFE and inevitable discovery

Defendant was stopped for using a school student’s Metrocard to get on the NYC subway because he looked and was a so older. His backpacked was removed, and he was handcuffed. His backpack was searched incident to his arrest. The … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def’s search incident of his backpack for fraudulent use of a Metrocard was valid at least on GFE and inevitable discovery

CAAF: Inevitable discovery and lack of bad faith saved AFOSI’s exceeding scope of search authorization

AFOSI officers exceed the military search authorization which omitted defendant’s bags. They’d sought a search of the bags and it was within the confines of the affidavit. There was no bad faith, and they were actively investigating pursuing leads on … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CAAF: Inevitable discovery and lack of bad faith saved AFOSI’s exceeding scope of search authorization

E.D.Va.: Suit over opening medical records envelope as non-legal mail was frivolous

Suit over opening of non-legal mail, here medical records, was frivolous. Villafana v. Clarke, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54893 (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2018). The first officer at the scene conducted a search without probable cause. A supervising officer appeared … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Suit over opening medical records envelope as non-legal mail was frivolous

AF: Inevitable discovery validated finding CP while looking for text messages with minor

The search authorization was valid for text messages between defendant and a supposed 14-year-old girl. The AFOSI investigator found child pornography in what was thus found to be plain view. Even if, arguendo, the officer was looking for child pornography, … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on AF: Inevitable discovery validated finding CP while looking for text messages with minor