Category Archives: Reasonableness

GA: If the dog sniff comes before dispatch reports back on the DL check, the dog sniff is valid (4-3)

A dog sniff of a car while waiting for the driver’s and passenger’s DL info to come back did not in any way extend the stop, so it’s valid. (4-3) State v. Allen, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 789 (Nov. 2, 2015), … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on GA: If the dog sniff comes before dispatch reports back on the DL check, the dog sniff is valid (4-3)

M.D.Tenn.: “[D]etermining when a traffic stop has been completed, or reasonably should have been completed, can be complicated”

Reconsideration was sought under Rodriguez, and the court finds that defendant consented to the search before the stop became too long. United States v. Hendrix, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146860 (M.D.Tenn. Oct. 29, 2015):

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: “[D]etermining when a traffic stop has been completed, or reasonably should have been completed, can be complicated”

New Law Review Article: Wayne A. Logan, Cutting Cops Too Much Slack

Wayne A. Logan, Cutting Cops Too Much Slack, 104 Georgetown L.J. 87 (2015): Police officers can make mistakes, which, for better or worse, the U.S. Supreme Court has often seen fit to forgive. Police, for instance, can make mistakes of … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Wayne A. Logan, Cutting Cops Too Much Slack

Cal.1: Juvenile probation order to disclose all electronic passwords was overbroad

Juvenile probation order to disclose all electronic passwords was overbroad, following other recent cases. In re Ricardo P., 2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 931 (1st Dist. Oct. 22, 2015):

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.1: Juvenile probation order to disclose all electronic passwords was overbroad

NM: Police helicopter flyover at 50-100′ disrupted and damaged the property and scared the occupants and violated curtilage

A police helicopter flyover at 50-100′ disrupted and damaged the property and scared the occupants. Therefore, it violated the curtilage under the Fourth Amendment. Thus, the state constitutional issue does not have to be decided. State v. Davis, 2015 N.M. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NM: Police helicopter flyover at 50-100′ disrupted and damaged the property and scared the occupants and violated curtilage

N.D.N.Y.: Violation of Rule 41 in delay in searching cell phone doesn’t require suppression

The government obtained a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone and seized it promptly. The forensic search of the phone, however, didn’t occur for 85 days, after the 60 day window in the warrant. The defense, however, can show no … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Violation of Rule 41 in delay in searching cell phone doesn’t require suppression

Cal.4: Dispatch told officer that def was on probation for one crime, but it actually had expired; he was, however, on probation for something else; GFE applied

The officer here responded to a suspicious activity report and found a stolen trailer in defendant’s yard with a piece of pipe on it. He inquired of dispatch and was told defendant was on probation for brandishing a weapon. He … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.4: Dispatch told officer that def was on probation for one crime, but it actually had expired; he was, however, on probation for something else; GFE applied

OR automobile exception requires vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime

To justify the automobile exception in Oregon, the vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime. If parked, a warrant must be sought. State v. Belander, 274 Ore. App. 167, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1175 (September … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OR automobile exception requires vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime

W.D.Pa.: 71 minutes for consent search of car on PA Turnpike didn’t make it unreasonable per se

Defendant consented in writing to a search of his vehicle but it took 71 minutes before any drugs were found. The length of search alone does not make it unreasonable nor violate the terms of the consent. If he had … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: 71 minutes for consent search of car on PA Turnpike didn’t make it unreasonable per se

IN: Parent can consent to search of minor child’s bedroom

“As a matter of first impression in Indiana, we hold that it is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment for an officer to rely on the voluntary consent of a minor’s parent to search the minor’s bedroom inside the parent’s home.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IN: Parent can consent to search of minor child’s bedroom

CA7: Witness ID’s enough for arrest thus barring § 1983 case

Four witnesses ID’d defendant for a crime. The fact that the charges were later dropped didn’t form a basis for a § 1983 case. There was probable cause and no reasonable jury would conclude otherwise and that’s qualified immunity. Hart … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Witness ID’s enough for arrest thus barring § 1983 case

S.D.N.Y.: Whether an apt building stairwell is a “public place” is unsettled law in NYS, so def’s stop not unreasonable under Heien

Whether an open container in an apartment building stairwell was done in a “public place” is not clear and is unsettled under New York law, so the officer’s detention of defendant on this ground was not objectively unreasonable under Heien … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Whether an apt building stairwell is a “public place” is unsettled law in NYS, so def’s stop not unreasonable under Heien

N.D.Ga.: To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief

To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief, if they can be proved. United States v. Ochoa, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105925 (N.D.Ga. July 8, 2015). Officers had reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief

E.D.Mich.: Continuing stop after def proved he wasn’t person police were looking for was unreasonable

Officers stopped defendant thinking he was another. After defendant proved he was not the man they were looking for, they continued to detain him to check for warrants. He refused to consent to a patdown, and the officer then touched … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Continuing stop after def proved he wasn’t person police were looking for was unreasonable

NC Policy Blog: The Heien Effect

NC Policy Blog: The Heien Effect by Sharon McCloskey: In her dissenting opinion, state Supreme Court Justice Robin Hudson projected what might follow from a ruling condoning an officer’s subjective interpretation of the law: … Hudson was right.

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on NC Policy Blog: The Heien Effect

CA2: Cooperator exceeded officer’s direction in conducting a private search, but it’s still reasonable

A cooperator ended up taking evidence from defendant’s house without police direction. It was a private search not governed by the Fourth Amendment. “‘A private person cannot act unilaterally as an agent or instrument of the state; there must be … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA2: Cooperator exceeded officer’s direction in conducting a private search, but it’s still reasonable

IA: Mistake of law doesn’t support stop (and doesn’t discuss Heien)

Defendant was sitting in a car on a parking lot with an open container, and an officer arrested for that and searched. The court of appeals reversed. The open container law clearly only applies to streets and highways and not … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IA: Mistake of law doesn’t support stop (and doesn’t discuss Heien)

Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law

Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law, overruling all past cases. Reasonable suspicion is all that’s needed for a traffic stop, not probable cause. State v. Houghton, 2015 WI 79, 2015 Wisc. LEXIS 484 (July 14, 2015). Fleeing into … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law

D.S.D.: Def’s REP in a mailed letter ended when it was opened on receipt

Defendant’s expectation of privacy in letter he mailed ended when it was received and opened. The USMJ did not abuse his discretion in not reopening the suppression hearing to ask further questions about photographs. The suppression hearing was three days … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Def’s REP in a mailed letter ended when it was opened on receipt

CA5: Decision to use SRT to execute search warrant was not shown to be unreasonable on the totality

“Based on the totality of the circumstances, Officer Vinson’s decision to deploy the SRT to execute the search warrant for Ms. Bullock’s residence did not constitute force excessive to the need, nor was it objectively unreasonable.” Bailey v. Lawson, 2015 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA5: Decision to use SRT to execute search warrant was not shown to be unreasonable on the totality