Category Archives: Reasonableness

W.D.Pa.: 71 minutes for consent search of car on PA Turnpike didn’t make it unreasonable per se

Defendant consented in writing to a search of his vehicle but it took 71 minutes before any drugs were found. The length of search alone does not make it unreasonable nor violate the terms of the consent. If he had … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: 71 minutes for consent search of car on PA Turnpike didn’t make it unreasonable per se

IN: Parent can consent to search of minor child’s bedroom

“As a matter of first impression in Indiana, we hold that it is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment for an officer to rely on the voluntary consent of a minor’s parent to search the minor’s bedroom inside the parent’s home.” … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IN: Parent can consent to search of minor child’s bedroom

CA7: Witness ID’s enough for arrest thus barring § 1983 case

Four witnesses ID’d defendant for a crime. The fact that the charges were later dropped didn’t form a basis for a § 1983 case. There was probable cause and no reasonable jury would conclude otherwise and that’s qualified immunity. Hart … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Witness ID’s enough for arrest thus barring § 1983 case

S.D.N.Y.: Whether an apt building stairwell is a “public place” is unsettled law in NYS, so def’s stop not unreasonable under Heien

Whether an open container in an apartment building stairwell was done in a “public place” is not clear and is unsettled under New York law, so the officer’s detention of defendant on this ground was not objectively unreasonable under Heien … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Whether an apt building stairwell is a “public place” is unsettled law in NYS, so def’s stop not unreasonable under Heien

N.D.Ga.: To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief

To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief, if they can be proved. United States v. Ochoa, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105925 (N.D.Ga. July 8, 2015). Officers had reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief

E.D.Mich.: Continuing stop after def proved he wasn’t person police were looking for was unreasonable

Officers stopped defendant thinking he was another. After defendant proved he was not the man they were looking for, they continued to detain him to check for warrants. He refused to consent to a patdown, and the officer then touched … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Continuing stop after def proved he wasn’t person police were looking for was unreasonable

NC Policy Blog: The Heien Effect

NC Policy Blog: The Heien Effect by Sharon McCloskey: In her dissenting opinion, state Supreme Court Justice Robin Hudson projected what might follow from a ruling condoning an officer’s subjective interpretation of the law: … Hudson was right.

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on NC Policy Blog: The Heien Effect

CA2: Cooperator exceeded officer’s direction in conducting a private search, but it’s still reasonable

A cooperator ended up taking evidence from defendant’s house without police direction. It was a private search not governed by the Fourth Amendment. “‘A private person cannot act unilaterally as an agent or instrument of the state; there must be … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA2: Cooperator exceeded officer’s direction in conducting a private search, but it’s still reasonable

IA: Mistake of law doesn’t support stop (and doesn’t discuss Heien)

Defendant was sitting in a car on a parking lot with an open container, and an officer arrested for that and searched. The court of appeals reversed. The open container law clearly only applies to streets and highways and not … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IA: Mistake of law doesn’t support stop (and doesn’t discuss Heien)

Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law

Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law, overruling all past cases. Reasonable suspicion is all that’s needed for a traffic stop, not probable cause. State v. Houghton, 2015 WI 79, 2015 Wisc. LEXIS 484 (July 14, 2015). Fleeing into … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law

D.S.D.: Def’s REP in a mailed letter ended when it was opened on receipt

Defendant’s expectation of privacy in letter he mailed ended when it was received and opened. The USMJ did not abuse his discretion in not reopening the suppression hearing to ask further questions about photographs. The suppression hearing was three days … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Def’s REP in a mailed letter ended when it was opened on receipt

CA5: Decision to use SRT to execute search warrant was not shown to be unreasonable on the totality

“Based on the totality of the circumstances, Officer Vinson’s decision to deploy the SRT to execute the search warrant for Ms. Bullock’s residence did not constitute force excessive to the need, nor was it objectively unreasonable.” Bailey v. Lawson, 2015 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA5: Decision to use SRT to execute search warrant was not shown to be unreasonable on the totality

D.Kan.: Heien relieves a federal court of having to make fine distinctions about whether state traffic law was validated

Heien relieves a federal court of having to make fine distinctions about whether state traffic law was validated: The question is whether the officer’s view was reasonable. [Again, close enough for government work.] United States v. Morales, 2015 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Heien relieves a federal court of having to make fine distinctions about whether state traffic law was validated

MA: Order for fraternal twin to give up DNA to eliminate him here was unreasonable for an inadequate showing; contempt reversed

“This court concluded that a Superior Court judge, in entering a judgment of contempt in a criminal case due to the refusal, by a third party who was not a suspect, to comply with an order compelling him to provide … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MA: Order for fraternal twin to give up DNA to eliminate him here was unreasonable for an inadequate showing; contempt reversed

CA4 notes conflict in circuits in applying “egregious Fourth Amendment violation” for immigration removal cases

The Fourth Circuit wrestles with the appropriate standard for an “egregious Fourth Amendment violation” for immigration removal cases, and confirms and analyzes a conflict in the circuits and how to interpret SCOTUS’s Lopez-Mendoza. Here, the Fourth Amendment violations were not … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA4 notes conflict in circuits in applying “egregious Fourth Amendment violation” for immigration removal cases

IA: Officer’s even reasonable mistake of fact makes stop unreasonable

A mistake of fact about the existence of a stop sign (down because of construction) denies reasonable suspicion for the stop. This is not a mistake of law under Heien, a question reserved for another day. State v. Schueman, 2015 … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IA: Officer’s even reasonable mistake of fact makes stop unreasonable

Cal.App.Div.-San Diego follows Heien

After originally holding a reasonable mistake of law would not support a stop, Heien was decided, and the court reconsiders and holds that it does. People v. Campuzano, 2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 489 (App. Div. San Diego June 5, 2015). … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.App.Div.-San Diego follows Heien

TX1: A police officer contemplating a blood draw by search warrant is not obligated to inquire into the medical history of the suspect to predetermine reasonableness

A police officer contemplating a blood draw by search warrant is not obligated to inquire into the medical history of the suspect to predetermine reasonableness. Dromgoole v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 5662 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) June … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonableness | Comments Off on TX1: A police officer contemplating a blood draw by search warrant is not obligated to inquire into the medical history of the suspect to predetermine reasonableness

OH9: Where the car in which defendant was a passenger was going to be inventoried, def’s detention for officer safety was reasonable

The continued detention of the defendant passenger in a car, incidental to the stop of the driver, pending the inventory of the car was reasonable. The trial court resolved a fact dispute and concluded that defendant consented to a search … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on OH9: Where the car in which defendant was a passenger was going to be inventoried, def’s detention for officer safety was reasonable

D.Neb.: Defendant was clearly not free to leave and his 30 minute questioning was unreasonable and not even de minimus as in Rodriguez

The stop here was overlong under Rodriguez, but, of course, happened before. Here, however, the defendant was told he was free to leave, but the court finds that “There is no doubt that the defendant did not feel he was … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Defendant was clearly not free to leave and his 30 minute questioning was unreasonable and not even de minimus as in Rodriguez