D.S.D.: Def’s REP in a mailed letter ended when it was opened on receipt

Defendant’s expectation of privacy in letter he mailed ended when it was received and opened. The USMJ did not abuse his discretion in not reopening the suppression hearing to ask further questions about photographs. The suppression hearing was three days long. United States v. Lebeau, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86195 (D.S.D. July 2, 2015).

In a rare case, the District of Arizona finds no reasonable suspicion for a drug smuggling stop; what he observed collectively amounted to essentially nothing unusual. “Together, the evidence proffered by the government provides insufficient suspicion. Rather, the facts known to the agents at the time of the stop portray an unremarkable situation: (1) This stop occurred on a busy highway in Southern Arizona frequented by thousands of lawful travelers each year, not on a back road or indirect route; (2) Defendant was seated close to the steering wheel but exhibited no other suspicious behavior or driving maneuvers; (3) the agent did not point to a single traffic infraction committed by the driver; (4) the vehicle, while old with tinted windows, was properly registered and otherwise completely innocuous; (5) the vehicle suspension system was consistent with the age of the vehicle and the agent conceded that it could have been burdened with luggage as easily as contraband. As a whole, Agent Rubalcava’s generalized observations cast suspicion on a large segment of the law-abiding population. In totality, the claimed suspicious circumstances articulated by the agent construct the very slenderest of reeds on which to lean his suspicion.” United States v. Morales Loya, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84969 (D.Ariz. April 24, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.