Category Archives: Plain view, feel, smell

MN: By living with a person on probation, one has a diminished REP in common areas

By choosing to live in the same house with a probationer, one has a diminished expectation of privacy in the common areas of one’s abode. In a probation search of the other occupant, defendant objected to the entry, but it … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MN: By living with a person on probation, one has a diminished REP in common areas

CA3: Frisk was justified by RS and plain feel of drugs resulted

The officer had reasonable suspicion to frisk defendant, and the drugs in his pocket were discovered by plain feel. United States v. Graves, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 25157 (3d Cir. Dec. 13, 2017). Smell of marijuana during a traffic stop … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA3: Frisk was justified by RS and plain feel of drugs resulted

S.D.Ga.: Def shooting victim’s clothes could be seized from ER floor as plain view or because of exigency

Defendant arrived at a hospital ER after he was shot. His clothing was cut off him and on the floor, and the officer’s seizure was valid because it was in plain view and had clear evidentiary value from blood and … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Def shooting victim’s clothes could be seized from ER floor as plain view or because of exigency

CA5: Def’s girlfriend has actual authority to consent to a search even though she was moving out

“Valenzuela had actual authority to consent to the search, or at the very least, the officer had a reasonable belief she had common authority over the residence. E.g., United States v. Matlock, …; see also Illinois v. Rodriguez, …. Valenzuela … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA5: Def’s girlfriend has actual authority to consent to a search even though she was moving out

OH8: Anonymous call about drug dealing from car led officers to defendants; smell of burning MJ led to valid search of car

The officer received an anonymous call about drug deals being done from a car in a shopping center parking lot. He pulled up to a parked car to check it out and it was occupied and smelled of burning marijuana. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: Anonymous call about drug dealing from car led officers to defendants; smell of burning MJ led to valid search of car

OH12: 911 call about overdose brought narcs and EMS; entry justified and plain view sustained

Defendant was making methamphetamine in his garage, and he overdosed on heroin. His mother found him and called 911. A narcotics officer arrived shortly before EMS, and he saw defendant on the floor with a used syringe near him. EMS … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH12: 911 call about overdose brought narcs and EMS; entry justified and plain view sustained

W.D.Mo.: Knock-and-announce didn’t apply to an open door; plain view reasonable, but wife’s consent was vitiated by threat of jail if she didn’t sign form

Officers came to defendant’s house both on a call about the welfare of children living there and with a pre-existing warrant for defendant’s arrest. They encountered one of the children outside taking trash to the street and determined that defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Knock and announce, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Knock-and-announce didn’t apply to an open door; plain view reasonable, but wife’s consent was vitiated by threat of jail if she didn’t sign form

OH12: Def’s petition for discretionary review dismissed for failure to file briefs leaves appellate result intact

The trial court suppressed but the court of appeals reversed. The supreme court granted discretionary review, but it was dismissed for defendant’s failure to file a brief. The case was remanded back to the trial court, and the appellate reversal … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH12: Def’s petition for discretionary review dismissed for failure to file briefs leaves appellate result intact

NY4: Officers rearranged things to photograph them during a consent entry and plain view didn’t vitiate the PC

Defendant’s wife called 911 to report a possible burglary, and police were invited in. In the house they did a protective sweep, and they saw likely evidence of dogfighting: a caged injured dog, a treadmill modified for dogs “and apparent … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on NY4: Officers rearranged things to photograph them during a consent entry and plain view didn’t vitiate the PC

CA6: Auto exception continues to place of inventory; heroin found by plain feel

Defendant’s car was pulled over for a missing license plate and overtinting. The “plain” smell of marijuana was evident, and he was removed from the car for a patdown. The patdown revealed heroin by plain feel, which was valid. The … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA6: Auto exception continues to place of inventory; heroin found by plain feel

TX14: Private search in Texas not subject to statute exclusionary rule

Defendant’s girlfriend accessed his cell phones: his Android wasn’t password protected but his iPhone was but she knew the password. This was a private search, and the Texas statutory exclusionary rule doesn’t apply. Thomas v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search | Comments Off on TX14: Private search in Texas not subject to statute exclusionary rule

N.D.Ga.: SW for seizure and search of a computer allows the search to be done at a later time

A second search of a computer’s contents is usually justified by the initial search and seizure warrant for the computer. United States v. Perry, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148336 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 13, 2017). Officers went to a Biloxi motel … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: SW for seizure and search of a computer allows the search to be done at a later time

D.Mont.: How many ways can this vehicle search be sustained that go unmentioned?

Defendant was stopped for driving erratically through a construction zone, and when stopped, he was acting strange and officers ordered his hands up. He slowly raised them with a cell phone in hand. Hands on guns, officers approached and saw … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Mont.: How many ways can this vehicle search be sustained that go unmentioned?

E.D.Ky.: Basis for traffic stop doesn’t need to be decided where there was independent RS

There’s no point in quibbling here over the basis of the traffic stop because the officer had reasonable suspicion of drug trafficking, too. United States v. Mejia-Palacio, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128922 (E.D. Ky. July 25, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Basis for traffic stop doesn’t need to be decided where there was independent RS

CA8: When a gun is seized in a business, govt must show justification; here it failed to show officer safety was an issue. A gun on a shelf in a business is not exigency per se.

An undercover officer entered a tattoo parlor looking for a “person of interest” in an unrelated case. A gun was seen on a shelf in the “work area.” Officers came back. Customers were allowed in the “work area” by invitation … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA8: When a gun is seized in a business, govt must show justification; here it failed to show officer safety was an issue. A gun on a shelf in a business is not exigency per se.

W.D.Ky.: Laptop in car was in plain view for seizure where there was PC it contained evidentiary information

Defendant’s laptop was in plain view when it was seized from his car when defendant was arrested because the police believed that stolen credit card information would be on it. United States v. Prado, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111954 (W.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Laptop in car was in plain view for seizure where there was PC it contained evidentiary information

D.P.R.: Protective sweep of garage and upstairs was valid; plain view sustained, but search of closed bag suppressed

“[T]he court finds that extending the protective sweep to the garage and the second floor was within the bounds set forth by the Supreme Court in Buie and the First Circuit in United States v. Winston, 444 F.3d 115, 120 … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Protective sweep of garage and upstairs was valid; plain view sustained, but search of closed bag suppressed

LA4: No right to a Miranda warning when consent sought for DNA swab

Taking DNA by a buccal swab is a search, but defendant doesn’t have a right to a Miranda warning when consent is sought. State v. Cooper, 2017 La. App. LEXIS 1211 (La.App. 4 Cir. July 5, 2017). The seizure of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, DNA, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on LA4: No right to a Miranda warning when consent sought for DNA swab

TX1: Smell of MJ in car not found didn’t support search of pockets

The smell of marijuana coming from defendant’s car, never found in a search of the car, didn’t justify a search of his person while he was handcuffed and sitting on the curb. Meane v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 5976 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX1: Smell of MJ in car not found didn’t support search of pockets

OH5: Plain view didn’t apply to a firearm where it wasn’t readily obvious it was stolen

The plain view doctrine did not apply because the firearm was not immediately apparent as incriminating evidence or contraband, and testimony at the suppression hearing established the officers could not readily identify the firearm as stolen. State v. Elschlager, 2017-Ohio-5545, … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH5: Plain view didn’t apply to a firearm where it wasn’t readily obvious it was stolen