Category Archives: Informant hearsay

N.D.Ohio: Lack of CI’s track record can be overlooked with corroboration of the story

The CI’s track record wasn’t disclosed but the corrobation was. Probable cause was shown. “Here, Detective Shelton’s affidavit established probable cause. Shelton’s affidavit relayed the informant’s statement that Defendant Butts was manufacturing Fentanyl tablets using Drug Mart brand pain medication. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Lack of CI’s track record can be overlooked with corroboration of the story

NY3: CI showed PC; GPS warrant corroborated the CI

The CI appeared and testified to the probable cause. A separate search warrant for GPS tracking corroborated the CI. People v. Jackson, 2020 NY Slip Op 07251, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7450 (3d Dept. Dec. 3, 2020). The CI … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY3: CI showed PC; GPS warrant corroborated the CI

D.Md.: Local officer assigned to federal task force is a “federal law enforcement officer” for Rule 41

A local officer assigned to an IRS task force is a “federal law enforcement officer” for Rule 41 to seek warrants. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not making an unmeritorious argument. United States v. Jackson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223799 … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Md.: Local officer assigned to federal task force is a “federal law enforcement officer” for Rule 41

N.D.Ohio: Controlled buys leading to a SW doesn’t require open discovery of everything with the buys

Controlled buys leading to a search warrant don’t enable the defense to get discovery on nearly everything underlying the controlled buys. United States v. Arnold, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213800 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2020):

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Controlled buys leading to a SW doesn’t require open discovery of everything with the buys

N.D.Ohio: Arrest during mayor’s civil unrest proclamation was unreasonable, and vehicle plain view suppressed

Defendant’s arrest under the Cleveland Mayor’s civil unrest proclamation was unreasonable, and the plain view was a result of the illegal arrest. United States v. Long, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213676 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 16, 2020). Petitioner generally claimed the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Arrest during mayor’s civil unrest proclamation was unreasonable, and vehicle plain view suppressed

D.Mass.: Def accidentally lost his fanny pack in flight; court finds abandonment even though he didn’t intend it

The court finds defendant abandoned his fanny pack which he said was strapped over his chest and fell off during flight from the police. He testified he didn’t intentionally drop the fanny pack, and it must have slipped off while … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Def accidentally lost his fanny pack in flight; court finds abandonment even though he didn’t intend it

FL4: Police use of a flashlight isn’t itself a search

“R.F. appeals the denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence. Because we conclude appellant was not seized for Fourth Amendment purposes where the deputy used a spotlight and a flashlight to illuminate his approach of appellant, we affirm the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Search, Waiver | Comments Off on FL4: Police use of a flashlight isn’t itself a search

PA: CSLI warrant was particular with phone number and time, without name of owner

CSLI warrant was particular when it described the phone number and time period and didn’t have to name the phone owner. Commonwealth v. Davis, 2020 Pa. Super. LEXIS 885 (Oct. 23, 2020). The officer spent a week corroborating the CI, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on PA: CSLI warrant was particular with phone number and time, without name of owner

N.D.Ala.: Def failed to prove he was an overnight guest with standing

Defendant lacked standing where he purported to be an overnight guest, but the host said no. United States v. Spencer, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191102 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 4, 2020), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190308 (N.D. Ala. Oct. 14, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Def failed to prove he was an overnight guest with standing

MT: Private actor recording conversation on own didn’t violate state constitution

The Montana Constitution’s more “robust protection from government intrusions” still only protects against state action. A private actor recording a conversation without impetus from the state was not unreasonable. State v. Wolfe, 2020 MT 260, 2020 Mont. LEXIS 2436 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Private search, State constitution | Comments Off on MT: Private actor recording conversation on own didn’t violate state constitution

CA2: CIs don’t need “a track record of reliability” when shown otherwise reliable

The CI was described in the affidavit for the warrant as “reliable,” but didn’t elaborate. “Circuit precedent does not require informants to have a track record of reliability. … Here, where the informant testified under oath before the issuing judge … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA2: CIs don’t need “a track record of reliability” when shown otherwise reliable

E.D.Wis.: When 911 caller gives name, the police don’t have to verify caller exists

The caller wasn’t anonymous because he gave his name. “The fact that the 911 dispatcher could not confirm that identity does not change that fact. In arguing that the police could not verify [his] credibility, the defendant ignores the facts … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: When 911 caller gives name, the police don’t have to verify caller exists

S.D.Miss.: Two gas station employees reporting suspicious car were treated as citizen informants

Reports from two gas station employees known by name and to have been robbed in the past were from citizen informants. They warned against a suspicious car. United States v. Cooper, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182012 (S.D. Miss. Oct. 1, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Two gas station employees reporting suspicious car were treated as citizen informants

W.D.N.Y.: Finding a gun during an automobile exception search doesn’t mean the search should end

Having found a gun during an automobile exception search, the officers weren’t obliged to stop the search. United States v. Green, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180561 (W.D. N.Y. Sept. 30, 2020). A CI’s information was reasonable suspicion for a probation … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Finding a gun during an automobile exception search doesn’t mean the search should end

CA6: Closely monitored controlled buy shows CI’s reliability

The affidavit for the search warrant here didn’t state the second CI was reliable, but reliability was shown by closely monitoring the controlled buy, and that showed probable cause. United States v. Jones, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 29878 (6th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Closely monitored controlled buy shows CI’s reliability

E.D.Tex.: Def’s attempts to distinguish Hudson and no ER for knock-and-announce fails

Defendant’s efforts to distinguish Hudson and its refusal to apply the exclusionary rule to knock-and-announce violations fail. United States v. Pyles, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169623 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 16, 2020). Petitioner gets a CoA on the following habeas issue: … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Knock and announce | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Def’s attempts to distinguish Hudson and no ER for knock-and-announce fails

TN: A security guard’s state license is not “state action” for 4A

A state licensed private security guard was not a state actor under the Fourth Amendment when he searched defendant’s cell phone trying to determine the owner. State v. Simpson, 2020 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 594 (Sept. 1, 2020). “Additionally, we … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Private search | Comments Off on TN: A security guard’s state license is not “state action” for 4A

IN: CI’s statement he bought from def ten times was a statement against penal interest

The CI was the target of a search, and he snitched off defendant as his source for about ten sales, the most recent the day before. That was a statement against penal interest. State v. Stone, 2020 Ind. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: CI’s statement he bought from def ten times was a statement against penal interest

OH2: Giving false name and DOB after SW executed supports obstruction charge

Defendant was removed from his house after a search warrant was served by the SWAT team. His false name and DOB to the officers supported his obstruction conviction. State v. Castleberry, 2020-Ohio-4233, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3129 (2d Dist. Aug. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH2: Giving false name and DOB after SW executed supports obstruction charge

CA11: 2255 petitioner made a showing that reasonable jurists could disagree on merits of 4A claim not pursued, so he gets a CoA

Defendant, a 2255 petitioner, made a sufficient showing that reasonable jurists could disagree whether the Fourth Amendment claim that wasn’t pursued had merit. Therefore, the CoA is granted. Day v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 27153 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA11: 2255 petitioner made a showing that reasonable jurists could disagree on merits of 4A claim not pursued, so he gets a CoA