Category Archives: Qualified immunity

D.V.I.: On reopening suppression hearing, govt proves inevitable discovery of def’s DNA

In a prior post, United States v. Wrensford, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138235 (D. V.I. Aug. 15, 2019), the court held that the government didn’t get the benefit of inevitable discovery of defendant’s DNA for lack of proof. The court … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.V.I.: On reopening suppression hearing, govt proves inevitable discovery of def’s DNA

CA9: DC erred in defining 4A at too “high [a] level of generality”; school officials get QI

Plaintiff was restrained in school for behavioral problems. The case law is not clear as to whether this was a Fourth Amendment violation or not because some restraint in school is reasonable. The district court found a Fourth Amendment violation … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: DC erred in defining 4A at too “high [a] level of generality”; school officials get QI

CA9: Not clearly established that shooting a bloody man waving a sharp stick at adults and children at a soccer field was clearly established

Plaintiff was bloody and wielding a sharp stick at adults and children at a soccer field. He disobeyed police commands. He was finally shot when he was kneeling and far enough away from others that he was a lesser threat. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Not clearly established that shooting a bloody man waving a sharp stick at adults and children at a soccer field was clearly established

D.Kan.: Seeing shot man slumped against window in a motel room is quite obviously exigency

Clearly exigent circumstances for a warrantless entry into a motel room: “Based on the facts in this case, the court finds that the officers had a reasonable basis to believe that there was an immediate need to protect the safety … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Seeing shot man slumped against window in a motel room is quite obviously exigency

CA6: Def let a man into his house to talk to his wife; he was a plainclothes officer who didn’t ID himself and saw def handle a firearm, and def was a felon; no deception for entry

“While at home on a cold November morning, William Wooden heard a knock at the door. Upon opening it, Wooden was greeted by a man asking to speak with Wooden’s wife. Wooden went to get her. And he allowed the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Def let a man into his house to talk to his wife; he was a plainclothes officer who didn’t ID himself and saw def handle a firearm, and def was a felon; no deception for entry

CA5: Even assuming 4A violation, ptf doesn’t show it was clearly established

“In short, we decline to opine on whether Campbell’s actions amount to a [Fourth Amendment] violation. Robles failed to meet his burden to show that such a violation was clearly established, particularly when dealing with an underlying violent crime. Accordingly, … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA5: Even assuming 4A violation, ptf doesn’t show it was clearly established

E.D.Mo.: FIPF arrest justifies search incident

Defendant’s arrest for being a felon in possession justified his search incident. United States v. Westfall, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217329 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 18, 2019).* Defendant’s detention was without reasonable suspicion and unreasonably extended. A probation officer was working … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: FIPF arrest justifies search incident

W.D.Pa.: Four prior controlled buys and def’s arrival at location for another was PC

Officers had four controlled buys and defendants were arriving at a predetermined location for another one. That was probable cause. United States v. Boxley, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214715 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2019).* Consent to search the premises was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Four prior controlled buys and def’s arrival at location for another was PC

CA11: The lack of even arguable PC for ptf’s arrest denies the officer QI

This is a Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claim. “The district court, upon a close analysis of the elements of the crimes alleged, determined that the facts proffered by Detective Brashears are insufficient to establish probable cause, or even arguable probable … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: The lack of even arguable PC for ptf’s arrest denies the officer QI

Two on excessive force and QI

“We conclude that Detective Minium is entitled to qualified immunity. It was not clearly established in August 2014 that an officer uses excessive force when he tackles and uses a taser in “drive stun” mode on an individual he is … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Two on excessive force and QI

CA4: Search of def’s backpack and finding gun was inevitable because it would have been inventoried in any event

“The evidence presented to the district court supported a finding that the firearm inevitably would have been discovered during an inventory search of the plastic bag. Officers Lucy and DiPentima testified that it was standard procedure to inventory an arrestee’s … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Search of def’s backpack and finding gun was inevitable because it would have been inventoried in any event

WA: Arrestee’s right to advice of right to counsel doesn’t require stopping execution of SW to tell him

While an arrestee is entitled to a prompt notice of his right to counsel, police do not have to interrupt execution of a search warrant to do it. State v. Ackerman, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 3023 (Dec. 2, 2019). Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WA: Arrestee’s right to advice of right to counsel doesn’t require stopping execution of SW to tell him

CA5: Use of deadly force against an armed, dangerous, and unpredicable man was subject to QI

Officers were entitled to qualified immunity because plaintiff could not establish that they used excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The evidence indicated that the use of force was justified under the circumstances. Because the officers thought they … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA5: Use of deadly force against an armed, dangerous, and unpredicable man was subject to QI

W.D.Pa.: Even if the one challenged sentence in the SW affidavit was stricken under Franks, PC would still exist

Defendant challenged one sentence in the affidavit as a Franks violation, but it doesn’t even appear to be false. Moreover, even if that sentence were stricken, there still would be probable cause, and he fails in his burden of proof. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Even if the one challenged sentence in the SW affidavit was stricken under Franks, PC would still exist

CA11: Officer’s alleged lies to get arrest warrant denies QI

“With that in mind, we affirm the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. As indicated above, we accept for purposes of this appeal that Gill falsified information in the affidavits supporting his arrest warrants and therefore, he would not have … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer’s alleged lies to get arrest warrant denies QI

NY4: Summary judgment on false arrest and excessive force claim without considering officers’ testimony in underlying criminal trial was error

Summary judgment against the defendants for false arrest and excessive force was improperly granted without considering the transcript of plaintiff’s criminal trial and the officers’ testimony there. Hernandez v Denny’s Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 08302, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Summary judgment on false arrest and excessive force claim without considering officers’ testimony in underlying criminal trial was error

E.D.Tenn.: Facebook photo of def felon with a firearm apparently taken in a home justified a SW for his home

Defendant’s alleged threat on Facebook involving use of firearms, along with a picture of a firearm suggested it was in a home. The search warrant of defendant’s home was with probable cause. Defendant’s effort to “dissect” the affidavit paragraph by … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Facebook photo of def felon with a firearm apparently taken in a home justified a SW for his home

TN: Failure to include the search warrant and affidavit in the record on appeal waives the search issue

Failure to include the search warrant and affidavit in the record on appeal waives the search issue. State v. Parks, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 740 (Nov. 13, 2019). The officer gets qualified immunity because there was probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on TN: Failure to include the search warrant and affidavit in the record on appeal waives the search issue

WV: Exclusionary rule does not apply in civil cases

DHHR obtained information about the parents from an alleged illegal stop. The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases. In re N.R., 2019 W. Va. LEXIS 524 (Nov. 7, 2019). A game warden approached plaintiff sitting in his truck in … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on WV: Exclusionary rule does not apply in civil cases

CA4: Ptf shot and paralyzed during no-knock raid states a claim and survives QI

During a no-knock entry with a battering ram by plain-clothes officers for marijuana, plaintiff heard a commotion from the back of his house, reached for a gun, and was shot at 29 times, hit 9 times, and paralyzed. The officer … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Knock and announce, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf shot and paralyzed during no-knock raid states a claim and survives QI