Category Archives: Qualified immunity

Reason: Does Letting Police Enter Your House Give Them Permission To Wreck It?

Reason: Does Letting Police Enter Your House Give Them Permission To Wreck It? by Jacob Sullum The Institute for Justice asks the Supreme Court to clarify a doctrine that shields cops from responsibility for outrageous conduct.

Posted in Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on Reason: Does Letting Police Enter Your House Give Them Permission To Wreck It?

CA7: Handcuffing winded obese man behind his back led to death because of unknown heart condition; not excessive force

Plaintiff’s decedent was in a foot chase with officers after a shoplifting incident. He was winded, obese, and, unknown to officers, had a heart condition. He was handcuffed behind his back and died from lack of oxygen in his blood. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Handcuffing winded obese man behind his back led to death because of unknown heart condition; not excessive force

CA10: Causing a handcuffed unseatbelted arrestee to be bounced around the back seat while driving fast and recklessly states an excessive force claim; no QI

“McCowan based his excessive-force claim on his assertion that Officer Moralez placed McCowan in the back seat of a patrol car, handcuffed behind his back and unrestrained by a seatbelt, and then drove recklessly to the police station, knowing his … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Causing a handcuffed unseatbelted arrestee to be bounced around the back seat while driving fast and recklessly states an excessive force claim; no QI

D.Md.: Conviction at trial despite reversal on appeal forecloses § 1983 false arrest case

Plaintiff was charged with OVI and was convicted at trial. On appeal to the next level he was found not guilty of that but convicted of evading an interlock device. He sued over the OVI arrest, and it is dismissed … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abstention, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Md.: Conviction at trial despite reversal on appeal forecloses § 1983 false arrest case

CA5: Def was stopped on RS when officers arrived at a drug house to serve an arrest warrant; he could have been armed or would warn others

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights were not violated by officers who stopped on reasonable suspicion to stop him based on the fact that defendant was told to stop when he walked away from officers and attempted to leave their field of … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Def was stopped on RS when officers arrived at a drug house to serve an arrest warrant; he could have been armed or would warn others

D.V.I.: On reopening suppression hearing, govt proves inevitable discovery of def’s DNA

In a prior post, United States v. Wrensford, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138235 (D. V.I. Aug. 15, 2019), the court held that the government didn’t get the benefit of inevitable discovery of defendant’s DNA for lack of proof. The court … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.V.I.: On reopening suppression hearing, govt proves inevitable discovery of def’s DNA

CA9: DC erred in defining 4A at too “high [a] level of generality”; school officials get QI

Plaintiff was restrained in school for behavioral problems. The case law is not clear as to whether this was a Fourth Amendment violation or not because some restraint in school is reasonable. The district court found a Fourth Amendment violation … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: DC erred in defining 4A at too “high [a] level of generality”; school officials get QI

CA9: Not clearly established that shooting a bloody man waving a sharp stick at adults and children at a soccer field was clearly established

Plaintiff was bloody and wielding a sharp stick at adults and children at a soccer field. He disobeyed police commands. He was finally shot when he was kneeling and far enough away from others that he was a lesser threat. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Not clearly established that shooting a bloody man waving a sharp stick at adults and children at a soccer field was clearly established

D.Kan.: Seeing shot man slumped against window in a motel room is quite obviously exigency

Clearly exigent circumstances for a warrantless entry into a motel room: “Based on the facts in this case, the court finds that the officers had a reasonable basis to believe that there was an immediate need to protect the safety … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Seeing shot man slumped against window in a motel room is quite obviously exigency

CA6: Def let a man into his house to talk to his wife; he was a plainclothes officer who didn’t ID himself and saw def handle a firearm, and def was a felon; no deception for entry

“While at home on a cold November morning, William Wooden heard a knock at the door. Upon opening it, Wooden was greeted by a man asking to speak with Wooden’s wife. Wooden went to get her. And he allowed the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Def let a man into his house to talk to his wife; he was a plainclothes officer who didn’t ID himself and saw def handle a firearm, and def was a felon; no deception for entry

CA5: Even assuming 4A violation, ptf doesn’t show it was clearly established

“In short, we decline to opine on whether Campbell’s actions amount to a [Fourth Amendment] violation. Robles failed to meet his burden to show that such a violation was clearly established, particularly when dealing with an underlying violent crime. Accordingly, … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA5: Even assuming 4A violation, ptf doesn’t show it was clearly established

E.D.Mo.: FIPF arrest justifies search incident

Defendant’s arrest for being a felon in possession justified his search incident. United States v. Westfall, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217329 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 18, 2019).* Defendant’s detention was without reasonable suspicion and unreasonably extended. A probation officer was working … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: FIPF arrest justifies search incident

W.D.Pa.: Four prior controlled buys and def’s arrival at location for another was PC

Officers had four controlled buys and defendants were arriving at a predetermined location for another one. That was probable cause. United States v. Boxley, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214715 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2019).* Consent to search the premises was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Four prior controlled buys and def’s arrival at location for another was PC

CA11: The lack of even arguable PC for ptf’s arrest denies the officer QI

This is a Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claim. “The district court, upon a close analysis of the elements of the crimes alleged, determined that the facts proffered by Detective Brashears are insufficient to establish probable cause, or even arguable probable … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: The lack of even arguable PC for ptf’s arrest denies the officer QI

Two on excessive force and QI

“We conclude that Detective Minium is entitled to qualified immunity. It was not clearly established in August 2014 that an officer uses excessive force when he tackles and uses a taser in “drive stun” mode on an individual he is … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Two on excessive force and QI

CA4: Search of def’s backpack and finding gun was inevitable because it would have been inventoried in any event

“The evidence presented to the district court supported a finding that the firearm inevitably would have been discovered during an inventory search of the plastic bag. Officers Lucy and DiPentima testified that it was standard procedure to inventory an arrestee’s … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Search of def’s backpack and finding gun was inevitable because it would have been inventoried in any event

WA: Arrestee’s right to advice of right to counsel doesn’t require stopping execution of SW to tell him

While an arrestee is entitled to a prompt notice of his right to counsel, police do not have to interrupt execution of a search warrant to do it. State v. Ackerman, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 3023 (Dec. 2, 2019). Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WA: Arrestee’s right to advice of right to counsel doesn’t require stopping execution of SW to tell him

CA5: Use of deadly force against an armed, dangerous, and unpredicable man was subject to QI

Officers were entitled to qualified immunity because plaintiff could not establish that they used excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The evidence indicated that the use of force was justified under the circumstances. Because the officers thought they … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA5: Use of deadly force against an armed, dangerous, and unpredicable man was subject to QI

W.D.Pa.: Even if the one challenged sentence in the SW affidavit was stricken under Franks, PC would still exist

Defendant challenged one sentence in the affidavit as a Franks violation, but it doesn’t even appear to be false. Moreover, even if that sentence were stricken, there still would be probable cause, and he fails in his burden of proof. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Even if the one challenged sentence in the SW affidavit was stricken under Franks, PC would still exist

CA11: Officer’s alleged lies to get arrest warrant denies QI

“With that in mind, we affirm the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. As indicated above, we accept for purposes of this appeal that Gill falsified information in the affidavits supporting his arrest warrants and therefore, he would not have … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer’s alleged lies to get arrest warrant denies QI