Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

S.D.W.Va.: There was reasonable suspicion for a slight delay of an Express Mail package

“In what has become a large line of cases, a number of federal circuits have found that a combination of similar factors created reasonable suspicion to seize a package. The Court has no problem finding reasonable suspicion based solely on … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: There was reasonable suspicion for a slight delay of an Express Mail package

CA6: A rare § 2254 reversal: defense counsel ineffective for not pursuing a clearly winnable Fourth Amendment claim; state court findings unreasonable under AEDPA

In a rare § 2254 reversal, the Sixth Circuit finds defense counsel ineffective for not pursuing a clearly winnable Fourth Amendment claim, and the state court findings were unreasonable under AEDPA. Grumbley v. Burt, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 1429 (6th … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: A rare § 2254 reversal: defense counsel ineffective for not pursuing a clearly winnable Fourth Amendment claim; state court findings unreasonable under AEDPA

D.Neb.: IP address associated with CP enough to search computers at address where IP used

“In the Eighth Circuit, for the purposes of determining whether probable cause exists to search a computer [for child pornography], an IP address assigned to a specific user at the time illegal internet activity associated with that IP address occurs … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: IP address associated with CP enough to search computers at address where IP used

D.Minn.: Emergency lights alone doesn’t prove a “stop”; defendant was already parked

Defendant was already parked, so he wasn’t stopped, and the officer’s use of the emergency lights on his police car are not determinative of whether there was a “stop.” There was no display of weapons, touching of defendant, no coercive … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Emergency lights alone doesn’t prove a “stop”; defendant was already parked

E.D.Tenn.: Def’s efforts to distance self from drugs at suppression hearing costs him standing

The defendant’s statements to the USMJ that he was neither a resident nor a guest at the house searched denies him standing to contest the search there. United States v. Griffin, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3695 (E.D. Tenn. January 13, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Private search, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def’s efforts to distance self from drugs at suppression hearing costs him standing

E.D.Mich.: Defense counsel was completely unaware of Simmons rule and didn’t pursue suppression motion to keep def off stand

Defense counsel’s being unaware that suppression hearing testimony can’t generally be used at trial (the Simmons (1968) rule) was a failure of performance under Strickland and was not strategy. Defendant, however, would have lost the motion on the merits anyway, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Defense counsel was completely unaware of Simmons rule and didn’t pursue suppression motion to keep def off stand

CA11: Computer tech’s seeing CP on computer authorized warrant for computer and their copies

Defendant took his computer to a computer tech to have the data transferred to a new computer. They found child pornography, reported it to the police and copied it. The police seized the computer and got a search warrant for … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Private search | Comments Off on CA11: Computer tech’s seeing CP on computer authorized warrant for computer and their copies

ID: In a search and seizure IAC claim, if def would lose on merits of search, he fails both prongs of Strickland

In an IAC claim involving a search claim, the trial court can determine the merits of the search claim. If the defendant would lose, he then loses both prongs of the Strickland standard. Remanded for making findings. Padilla v. State, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on ID: In a search and seizure IAC claim, if def would lose on merits of search, he fails both prongs of Strickland

OH11: Defendant’s admitting she consented to search at trial precluded IAC claim for not challenging consent

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging defendant’s consent when she testified at trial that she consented to the search. State v. Driscol, 2014-Ohio-5608, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 5436 (11th Dist. December 22, 2014). Defendant’s prior DUI convictions weren’t … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH11: Defendant’s admitting she consented to search at trial precluded IAC claim for not challenging consent

CA5: Prison strip search state consent decree barred federal case involving same plaintiffs

A state consent decree that limited some prison strip searches was binding on the plaintiff because it retained enforcement jurisdiction. Therefore, he couldn’t refile that case in federal court to relitigate it. The district court’s preliminary injunction is reversed. Wilkerson … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Strip search | Comments Off on CA5: Prison strip search state consent decree barred federal case involving same plaintiffs

S.D.Cal.: Two border crossings at San Ysidro in 12 hrs added to reasonable suspicion

Reasonable suspicion for a stop 70 miles from the border was supported by the fact the car had crossed into the U.S. at San Ysidro twice in 12 hours. United States v. Garcia-Grimshaw, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173631 (S.D. Cal. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Two border crossings at San Ysidro in 12 hrs added to reasonable suspicion

CA5: Finding drugs in a car was probable cause to search other containers in the car

Finding drugs in a car was probable cause to search other containers in the car, here a bag. United States v. Leal, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23777 (5th Cir. February 7, 2014).* Defense counsel was not ineffective for withdrawing a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: Finding drugs in a car was probable cause to search other containers in the car

In OR, driver arrested for suspended DL can hand off purse to passenger without search

When defendant was stopped and arrested for driving on a suspended DL, she refused consent to search her purse and wanted it given to the passenger for safekeeping. The police should have honored that request. The search of the purse … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on In OR, driver arrested for suspended DL can hand off purse to passenger without search

IL: Defense counsel not ineffective for not predicting Riley

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not predicting Riley. “Riley obviously changed things, but to accept defendant’s argument we would have to conclude counsel was ineffective for failing to predict the future and anticipate Riley. We decline to impose such … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IL: Defense counsel not ineffective for not predicting Riley

D.Minn.: The scene of a shooting is nexus for a SW

The scene of a shooting is a logical place to find evidence of the shooting. Therefore, that’s nexus, and probable cause exists. United States v. Strong, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170882 (D. Minn. November 21, 2014). Defense counsel was not … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The scene of a shooting is nexus for a SW

CA11: Exactly when the officer found out about the arrest warrant for defendant when the search incident occurred really doesn’t matter; there was a warrant

Exactly when the officer found out about the warrant for defendant when the search incident occurred really doesn’t matter. “A valid warrant for Freeman’s arrest existed when Officer Miller searched him. Regardless of whether the dispatcher had confirmed the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on CA11: Exactly when the officer found out about the arrest warrant for defendant when the search incident occurred really doesn’t matter; there was a warrant

CA7: Consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review

On plain error review, consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review. United States v. Price\, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22996 (7th Cir. December 5, 2014). There was no evidence defense counsel didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: Consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review

E.D.Va.: IAC claim for illegal search denied because it lacked specifics

“‘Ellis submits that some of the evidence seized were [sic] so done in violation of his Fourth Amendment right[s] against unreasonable search and seizure.’ (Mem. Supp. § 2255 Mot. 6-7.) Ellis supplies no basis upon which counsel could have filed … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: IAC claim for illegal search denied because it lacked specifics

DE: No RS for this probation search based on unverified tip

Delaware requires that there be reasonable suspicion for a probation search. Here, a police officer passed on an unverified tip from an informant that defendant was selling drugs, and that was used for a home visit. Defendant had a couple … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: No RS for this probation search based on unverified tip

AR: Def’s rear door shown as door where knock always answered, so curtilage not violated

Defendant’s house had a circle drive and a front door and a back door. The back door was found a normal place of entry. At the suppression hearing, the officer testified that he’d been there before on official business and … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on AR: Def’s rear door shown as door where knock always answered, so curtilage not violated