Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

OH7: Burning MJ coming from an apartment is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency to enter

Police answered a loud music call at 5 am in an apartment building, and they could smell burning marijuana outside defendant’s apartment door. Burning marijuana is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency for a police entry. A 1995 Ohio case … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH7: Burning MJ coming from an apartment is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency to enter

M.D.N.C.: Refusal to consent during knock-and-talk when smell of MJ was strong and a yell back inside was exigency

Officers did a knock-and-talk and they could smell marijuana before the knock. When defendant opened the door, the smell was stronger. He refused to consent and refused entry. He turned and yelled something inside and came outside. When he pulled … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Knock and talk | Comments Off on M.D.N.C.: Refusal to consent during knock-and-talk when smell of MJ was strong and a yell back inside was exigency

D.Me.: Fourth Amendment claim decided on appeal can’t be raised in 2255

Since defendant’s DNA Fourth Amendment claim was decided on the merits of his appeal, it can’t be litigated in a 2255. Thomas v. United States, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133478 (D.Me. September 30, 2015). Defendant’s consent to a blood draw … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Me.: Fourth Amendment claim decided on appeal can’t be raised in 2255

TN: Post-conviction petitioner bears burden of showing warrantless search was invalid; here, no witnesses to search called

Defendant on post-conviction did not prove that the motion to suppress an inventory would have been granted (and Tennessee law is favorable to the defense). All he called as witnesses were the lawyers involved and himself, but that does not … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Post-conviction petitioner bears burden of showing warrantless search was invalid; here, no witnesses to search called

LA: Trial counsel not ineffective for not moving to suppress search that was clearly based on exigency

Trial counsel was not ineffective for not pursuing an exigency-based search issue where police entered after hearing cries for help when the grandfather of missing children entered and found blood on the floor. A suppression motion would have lost. State … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on LA: Trial counsel not ineffective for not moving to suppress search that was clearly based on exigency

W.D.Va.: VA statute that permitted natural gas companies to survey open fields doesn’t violate Fourth Amendment

Virginia statute that permitted natural gas transmission companies to enter open fields for survey purposes did not facially violate the Fourth Amendment or Virginia Constitution. Charlottesville Div. v. Dominion Transmission, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132554 (W.D.Va. September 30, 2015). 2255 … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Open fields | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: VA statute that permitted natural gas companies to survey open fields doesn’t violate Fourth Amendment

AR: Community caretaking function justified opening car door of driver asleep in a parking lot at 4:30 am with engine running

Defendant was found in a parking lot at 4:30 am with his lights on and engine running, but asleep. Opening the door was within the community caretaking function. Szabo v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 512, 2015 Ark. App. LEXIS 591 … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Ineffective assistance, Roadblocks, Standing | Comments Off on AR: Community caretaking function justified opening car door of driver asleep in a parking lot at 4:30 am with engine running

D.Haw.: Alleged illegal search by “marshals of the Kingdom of Atooi” wasn’t acquiesced in by federal or state officials

A crate of marijuana was searched by “marshals of the Kingdom of Atooi,” a Polynesian kingdom within Hawai’i not otherwise described. Their search was not at insistence or with the acquiescence of the state or federal government, and it could … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Private search | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Alleged illegal search by “marshals of the Kingdom of Atooi” wasn’t acquiesced in by federal or state officials

IL: Refusal of consent to a parole search is a violation of parole conditions in itself

Under Illinois law, refusal of consent to a parole search is a violation of parole conditions in itself. That did not make the consent invalid. The court was entitled to believe he consented knowing that he had 800 g of … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Refusal of consent to a parole search is a violation of parole conditions in itself

D.S.C.: UnMirandized admission of gun in car created exigent circumstances

It was reasonable for the officer to ask about defendant having a firearm in the car when responding to a 911 call without Mirandizing him under its “public safety exception.” When defendant admitted there was a gun, the officer had … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.S.C.: UnMirandized admission of gun in car created exigent circumstances

E.D.Pa.: IAC claim has to say what def counsel didn’t try to suppress

An ineffective assistance claim that says defense counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress without saying what should have been suppressed states no claim at all. [It would also have to say that it would have been granted … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: IAC claim has to say what def counsel didn’t try to suppress

E.D.Tenn.: 2255 gets hearing on IAC claim; court can’t say that waived issue was meritless or strategic

“Yet, as illustrated above, the record does not contain sufficient information from which the Court can find that a suppression motion would have been meritless. As a result, the Court concludes that an evidentiary hearing is required on this claim. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: 2255 gets hearing on IAC claim; court can’t say that waived issue was meritless or strategic

OR: Search incident to arrest warrant found on unlawful detention suppressed; no attenuation

An unlawful detention without reasonable suspicion led to a warrants check, finding a warrant, and then a search. Since the stop was unreasonable, the finding of the warrant could not be attenuated from it. State v. Benning, 273 Ore. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OR: Search incident to arrest warrant found on unlawful detention suppressed; no attenuation

IA: Def counsel not charged with anticipating changes in law; no IAC for not arguing an issue adopted two years after appeal

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not arguing an issue that was not decided for the defense under the state constitution until two years after his appeal was decided. Counsel is not charged with anticipating changes in the law under … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Def counsel not charged with anticipating changes in law; no IAC for not arguing an issue adopted two years after appeal

CA9: The statute of limitations for a § 1983 search claim runs from the date of the search

The statute of limitations for a § 1983 search claim runs from the date of the search. Belanus v. Clark, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13648 (9th Cir. August 5, 2015). Defendant wasn’t prejudiced by defense counsel’s failure to challenge the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA9: The statute of limitations for a § 1983 search claim runs from the date of the search

CA6: Michigan’s state forfeiture law doesn’t deprive due process after an officer seizes money

Officers can issue a notice of forfeiture under Michigan law, and the person subject to the forfeiture has a valid state remedy, and that satisfies due process. “Officer Jones’s testimony is troubling, and municipalities should take care to operate within … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: Michigan’s state forfeiture law doesn’t deprive due process after an officer seizes money

OH10: A CODIS hit on defendant’s DNA was probable cause for a confirmatory DNA test

A CODIS hit on defendant’s DNA was probable cause for a confirmatory DNA test. State v. Goins, 2015-Ohio-3121, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3039 (10th Dist. August 4, 2015). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress before … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, DNA, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH10: A CODIS hit on defendant’s DNA was probable cause for a confirmatory DNA test

D.Minn.: If warrant lacked PC or was defective, def’s admissions in questioning would have led to another search warrant based on more, so inevitable discovery applies

Police doing a child porn investigation with an allegedly defective search warrant come to defendant to talk about it, and his admissions are enough that the police would have obtained a search warrant if they already didn’t have one. Therefore, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Minn.: If warrant lacked PC or was defective, def’s admissions in questioning would have led to another search warrant based on more, so inevitable discovery applies

E.D.Ark.: Inevitable discovery applies; def counsel overlooked suppression motion, but it wouldn’t have won

The state conceded that defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress satisfied the performance prong of Strickland. At issue, however, was the prejudice prong, and that failure did not amount to prejudice because the evidence would have been … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Inevitable discovery applies; def counsel overlooked suppression motion, but it wouldn’t have won

D.Md.: Strategic basis for waiving motion to suppress: it improved plea bargain

Defense counsel filed a colorable motion to suppress that here apparently improved defendant’s plea bargaining position. Thus it was reasonable to waive the motion for the plea, and there was no ineffective assistance. Walker v. United States, 2015 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Md.: Strategic basis for waiving motion to suppress: it improved plea bargain