Category Archives: Warrant execution

M.D.Pa.: Photographs of interior of house taken before SW issued are suppressed

Photographs of the interior of defendant’s house taken before the search warrant issued are suppressed. They did not have any effect on the issuance of the warrant, however. United States v. Carey, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190963 (M.D. Pa. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Photographs of interior of house taken before SW issued are suppressed

D.Utah: Ex ante motion to suppress before SW executed denied without prejudice; must follow search

Movant has notice of a search warrant not yet executed. Her ex ante motion to quash the search warrant is denied without prejudice. Under Rule 41(h), the motion should be filed after the search occurs. United States v. Richards, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Utah: Ex ante motion to suppress before SW executed denied without prejudice; must follow search

CA9: Using ruse to get def home to search his car under a SW was unreasonable

Officers had a warrant for defendant’s house and any cars parked there, but defendant wasn’t home. Using a ruse of a burglary having happened, they lured him home so they could search the car. The search of the car was … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: Using ruse to get def home to search his car under a SW was unreasonable

The Intercept: Texas Deployed Swat, Bomb Robot, Small Army of Cops to Arrest A Woman and Her Dog

The Intercept: Texas Deployed Swat, Bomb Robot, Small Army of Cops to Arrest A Woman and Her Dog by Seth Harp (“She had done nothing wrong. State troopers started following her because of ‘anti law enforcement rhetoric’ on her car … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on The Intercept: Texas Deployed Swat, Bomb Robot, Small Army of Cops to Arrest A Woman and Her Dog

D.Kan.: USMJ there properly issued SW for Dropbox account in California

Jurisdiction for search warrants in federal court is over the offense. Thus, a USMJ could sign a search warrant for a Dropbox account in California under the SCA. United States v. Hopkins, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173418 (D. Kan. Sept. … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Kan.: USMJ there properly issued SW for Dropbox account in California

D.Me.: Admittedly valid state SW for drug evidence on phone led to finding CP and a valid federal SW

Officers got a state search warrant for defendant’s cell phone for drugs and stumbled upon child pornography otherwise linked to him by his tattoos and voice. He admits the warrant was valid for drugs. A later federal search warrant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Me.: Admittedly valid state SW for drug evidence on phone led to finding CP and a valid federal SW

IL: Simple question during SW execution about whether def had been subjected to a SW before wasn’t interrogation where he volunteered where a gun was

A question to defendant during execution of a search warrant whether he’d been the target of a search warrant before led to an incriminating and unsolicited response about a gun that would not be suppressed. He wasn’t being interrogated. Therefore, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IL: Simple question during SW execution about whether def had been subjected to a SW before wasn’t interrogation where he volunteered where a gun was

CBS4 Miami: New England Patriots Owner Robert Kraft Wants Massage Parlor Videos Destroyed

CBS4 Miami: New England Patriots Owner Robert Kraft Wants Massage Parlor Videos Destroyed (“New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft says he wants a judge to destroy the controversial spa recordings that landed him with prostitution charges. Kraft’s legal team called … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on CBS4 Miami: New England Patriots Owner Robert Kraft Wants Massage Parlor Videos Destroyed

CA11: Officers executing a SW at a house can approach an occupied car parked out front

“The district court did not err by denying Turner’s motion to suppress. Delgado was entitled, ‘without any level of suspicion,’ to approach a car in a dangerous locale with an unknown number of occupants parked near a residence where he … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Seizure, Standards of review, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: Officers executing a SW at a house can approach an occupied car parked out front

AL: IAC claim not stated for not challenging failure to deliver copy of SW to def

Defendant didn’t adequately plead an ineffective assistance of counsel claim for defense counsel not arguing that defendant wasn’t given a copy of the search warrant at the time of the search so he could challenge the search. Smith v. State, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AL: IAC claim not stated for not challenging failure to deliver copy of SW to def

OH2: Giving false name and DOB after SW executed supports obstruction charge

Defendant was removed from his house after a search warrant was served by the SWAT team. His false name and DOB to the officers supported his obstruction conviction. State v. Castleberry, 2020-Ohio-4233, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3129 (2d Dist. Aug. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH2: Giving false name and DOB after SW executed supports obstruction charge

OH3: Unsigned SW still entitled to GFE

Even though the search warrant wasn’t signed in violation of the state rule, the good faith exception applies because the issuing judge found probable cause and said he issued the warrant. State v. Harrison, 2020-Ohio-3920, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2821 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH3: Unsigned SW still entitled to GFE

CA2: 31 day delay in getting SW for computer after seizure was unreasonable under 4A

“Following the district court’s hearing and ruling that the delay was not unreasonable, the appeal has been restored to this panel. We now rule that the police delayed unreasonably long in violation of the Fourth Amendment when they waited without … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA2: 31 day delay in getting SW for computer after seizure was unreasonable under 4A

NM: SW time limit to execute cell phone SW is from initial seizure, not the download

“[W]hen a warrant is issued to search an electronic device, that warrant is executed when the device is seized or the data is copied on-site, which must occur within Rule 5-211(C)’s ten-day time limit. Rule 5-211(C)’s ten-day time limit applies … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NM: SW time limit to execute cell phone SW is from initial seizure, not the download

D.Idaho: Broad email warrants are not per se unreasonable

Broad email search warrants were not unreasonable just because they were broad. The breadth of the financial crime under investigation justifies it. In addition, the good faith exception applies and it’s too early to tell if any has to be … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Broad email warrants are not per se unreasonable

D.C.Cir.: Applications for orders under SCA and ECPA presumptively public judicial records

Applications for orders under the Stored Communications Act and Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 are judicial records subject to public view under the common law. Pen register records are presumptively sealed under Title III. In the Matter of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Applications for orders under SCA and ECPA presumptively public judicial records

OH9: State argued RS but didn’t come forward with proof of it

The state argued there were factors supporting reasonable suspicion, but they didn’t come forward with it. Order granting motion to suppress affirmed. State v. Thomas, 2020-Ohio-3539, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2453 (9th Dist. June 30, 2020). The search warrant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH9: State argued RS but didn’t come forward with proof of it

MA: No right to counsel at execution of SW

“The defendant has presented no case law supporting his proposition that the target of a search warrant has a right to have counsel present during the execution of a warrant. The officers executed a warrant to search the defendant’s cell … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on MA: No right to counsel at execution of SW

IN: Search of def’s car when he shows up at home while SW being executed there was reasonable even though SW didn’t mention car

“Do law-enforcement officers violate either constitution by searching a person’s vehicle when the person drives that vehicle up to his or her house while officers are there executing a search warrant for the house that does not address vehicles? Based … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IN: Search of def’s car when he shows up at home while SW being executed there was reasonable even though SW didn’t mention car

RI: Reasonable use of force to take inmate’s DNA under SW wasn’t grounds for suppression

The trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion to suppress the taking of his DNA by force under a search warrant when he refused to cooperate. He already had a reduced expectation of privacy in the jail, and the state’s … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on RI: Reasonable use of force to take inmate’s DNA under SW wasn’t grounds for suppression