Category Archives: Issue preclusion

CA5: Police accidentally shooting a hostage isn’t an intentional seizure

“Here, the only plausible reading of the allegations is that Doe accidentally shot Ulises while trying to help him by ending the hostage situation. Such accidental conduct does not result in a Fourth Amendment seizure. See Brower, 489 U.S. at … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Police accidentally shooting a hostage isn’t an intentional seizure

CA10: Successor habeas denied on claim state judges denied 4A claims because they were racist

2254 petitioner’s claim the state courts failed to adequately consider his Fourth Amendment claim because they were racist was still barred as a successive habeas. White v. Crow, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 6769 (10th Cir. Mar. 9, 2021):

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Successor habeas denied on claim state judges denied 4A claims because they were racist

E.D.Tex.: 4A arrest claim also subject to Stone bar

Defendant’s 2254 claim that his arrest was without probable cause on mistaken identity is foreclosed by Stone v. Powell the same as Fourth Amendment search claims. “The opportunity, regardless of whether it is acted upon at the state level, is … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: 4A arrest claim also subject to Stone bar

E.D.N.Y.: Def gets access to SW materials, but govt can redact informant’s info

The target of a search warrant long ago served is entitled to unsealing the affidavit, but the government can redact the affiant’s name and identifying information. United States v. Storage Room Numbers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35977 (E.D. N.Y. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def gets access to SW materials, but govt can redact informant’s info

CA4: Suit by convict over arrest without PC doesn’t mention conviction and isn’t barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s complaint that his arrest was without probable cause doesn’t necessarily implicate his guilt or innocence, and it isn’t barred by Heck. He doesn’t even mention the conviction. Dizzley v. Garrett, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 4314 (4th Cir. Feb. 16, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Privileges | Comments Off on CA4: Suit by convict over arrest without PC doesn’t mention conviction and isn’t barred by Heck

D.D.C.: Failure to timely make return of papers under Rule 41 not a 4A violation

Failure to make the return of the warrant to the clerk along with the inventory in violation of Rule 41 requires more than just negligence in failing to do it on time. Where’s the prejudice? The court will not speculate … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Failure to timely make return of papers under Rule 41 not a 4A violation

M.D.Fla.: State court’s findings on PC [not appealed] not binding on federal court

A state court’s findings of lack of probable cause to proceed with some charges against the defendant isn’t binding on federal courts. “Based on the evidence presented at the hearing, including the 911 calls, bodycam footage, and the credible and … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: State court’s findings on PC [not appealed] not binding on federal court

CA2: Later search of bag was inevitable discovery overcoming objection to first search

Even if the search of defendant’s bag was invalid, he was taken to the police station and his bag was validly searched again an inventory. United States v. Ruffin, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 3351 (2d Cir. Feb. 8, 2021). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA2: Later search of bag was inevitable discovery overcoming objection to first search

E.D.Tenn.: Guilty plea in state court precludes claim that arrest lacked PC

Having pled guilty in state court, plaintiff can’t complain that the arrest leading to the plea lacked probable cause. Moser v. Davis, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13308 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 25, 2021). Petitioner had a “full and fair” opportunity to … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Guilty plea in state court precludes claim that arrest lacked PC

TX11: No spousal privilege in recorded jail calls

Defendant’s jail calls to his wife were not privileged because he knew from the recording at the start of the call that it was being recorded. Newman v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 293 (Tex. App. – Eastland Jan. 14, … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Privileges, Strip search | Comments Off on TX11: No spousal privilege in recorded jail calls

CA4: Ptf’s claim the statute he was arrested under was unconstitutional is barred by DeFillippo

Plaintiff’s claim that his arrest and search was invalid because the statute under which he was stopped and arrested was unconstitutional is barred by Michigan v. DeFillippo. Quigley v. City of Huntington, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 760 (4th Cir. Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf’s claim the statute he was arrested under was unconstitutional is barred by DeFillippo

E.D.Tenn.: Address wasn’t required where picture of property was in SW

Defendant’s address wasn’t included in the affidavit for the search warrant, but its picture was and there was no mistake on the place searched. That was sufficient. United States v. Lingo, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3861 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 8, … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Address wasn’t required where picture of property was in SW

CA10: Ptf’s conviction barred his 1983 claim because it established facts against him under Heck

“Mr. Birch’s convictions preclude him from establishing a genuine issue of material fact as to his Fourth Amendment excessive force claims against Officers Sinclair, Page, and Stout, Fourteenth Amendment malicious prosecution claims, and Fourth Amendment false arrest claims. In dismissing … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf’s conviction barred his 1983 claim because it established facts against him under Heck

CA11: Successor habeas over detention that led to confession not based on newly discovered evidence

Petitioner’s 2254 successor petition is denied on his claim that his detention was unreasonable that led to his confession. “Nero’s claims do not meet the statutory criteria. He indicates that his claims do not rely on a new rule of … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA11: Successor habeas over detention that led to confession not based on newly discovered evidence

CA5: Ptf’s underlying conviction is attacked by his 4A claim and thus barred by Heck

“We begin with Price’s Fourth Amendment excessive force claims as alleged in his proposed amended complaint. The district court concluded that Price’s claims, even as amended, remained ‘inseparable’ from his conviction for battery of an officer and, thus, were barred … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s underlying conviction is attacked by his 4A claim and thus barred by Heck

E.D.Pa.: State court’s suppression of evidence is a fact question for trial on underlying facts and findings and not preclusive

Plaintiff was charged in state court with possession, and the state court credited his version over that of the officers on the basis for the stop because their testimony was contradictory and confusing. Still, that doesn’t have preclusive effect in … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: State court’s suppression of evidence is a fact question for trial on underlying facts and findings and not preclusive

CA10: Heck bars excessive force claim where it attacks ptf’s guilty plea

“Heck bars Mr. Hooks from recovering damages based on the first four alleged uses of force. Mr. Hooks’s no contest plea to two counts of assault and battery of a police officer means he admitted repeatedly hitting the officers before … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Heck bars excessive force claim where it attacks ptf’s guilty plea

CA6: State court’s failure to remand for more factfinding was still a “full and fair opportunity to litigate” his 4A claim

Habeas petitioner’s CoA request is denied. His claim that he was denied a “full and fair opportunity to litigate” his Fourth Amendment claim because the state appellate court didn’t remand for fact finding is rejected. He had the opportunity to … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA6: State court’s failure to remand for more factfinding was still a “full and fair opportunity to litigate” his 4A claim

S.D.N.Y.: “Unconscionable breakdown” in SW litigation process can state habeas claim, but petitioner doesn’t plead or show one

“Petitioner does not argue that he was not provided a correct procedure to redress his Fourth Amendment claim. And indeed, there is no basis for such an argument, as the Second Circuit has indicated that New York’s procedure for litigating … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: “Unconscionable breakdown” in SW litigation process can state habeas claim, but petitioner doesn’t plead or show one

E.D.Tenn.: Issue preclusion applies in criminal cases but state’s dismissal of criminal case after motion to suppress doesn’t preclude feds

Issue preclusion applies in criminal cases, too, and the state’s dismissal of a case in the face of a successful motion to suppress doesn’t preclude the federal government from prosecuting afterward. This is a recognition of dual sovereignty. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Issue preclusion applies in criminal cases but state’s dismissal of criminal case after motion to suppress doesn’t preclude feds