Category Archives: Good faith exception

E.D.N.C.: PC was shown, but not nexus, and GFE does not apply

The affidavit showed probable cause, but it completely failed to show nexus to defendant’s place. It was so deficient in the showing of nexus that the good faith exception cannot apply. United States v. King, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18956 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonableness, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: PC was shown, but not nexus, and GFE does not apply

OH12: GFE applies to precedent decided day before search where nobody knew of the case

The day before defendant’s parole search, the state supreme court put the legality of his parole status in doubt. Nobody involved even knew about the case. The court agrees that the good faith exception applies to the search because there … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on OH12: GFE applies to precedent decided day before search where nobody knew of the case

E.D.Mich.: PC a close call, so GFE applies

“Ultimately, the Court need not decide which side of the Ramirez-Merriweather line [of probable cause] this case falls. It suffices to say that, especially because the search warrant affidavit makes no mention of any communications involving Jackson’s cell phone, it … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC a close call, so GFE applies

CA1: Defense must argue cost v. benefits of exclusionary rule or issue is likely waived

When invoking the exclusionary rule, the defendant necessarily has to show that the deterrence value of exclusion outweighs the costs of exclusion. United States v. Cruz-Ramos, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 2284 (1st Cir. Jan. 27, 2021), n. 9:

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA1: Defense must argue cost v. benefits of exclusionary rule or issue is likely waived

Pre-Carpenter CSLI was in good faith

The CSLI order here pre-dated Carpenter, and it was based on probable cause. Since Carpenter wasn’t retroactive, the motion to suppress is denied. United States v. Stamat, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14268 (D.Minn. Jan. 26, 2021).* Defendant’s CSLI was obtained … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Pre-Carpenter CSLI was in good faith

CA4: When lower court decides both PC and GFE, on appeal either one can be decided

When the district court decides both probable cause for issuance of the warrant and the good faith exception applies, the court of appeals need only decide one; here good faith. “Because our review of the record demonstrates that the affidavit … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA4: When lower court decides both PC and GFE, on appeal either one can be decided

CA4: The rental search was prior to Byrd making it unreasonable; Davis good faith applies

Search of a rental car before Byrd that subsequently made it unreasonable gets the benefit of the good faith exception. United States v. Houston, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 1643 (4th Cir. Jan. 21, 2021). There were material omissions from the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: The rental search was prior to Byrd making it unreasonable; Davis good faith applies

UT: Def succeeds on claim opening car door can be a 4A search, but loses on Davis good faith reliance on prior case

Police opening the door of defendant’s car on a McDonald’s parking lot where he’d nodded off can be a search. Prior authority permitting it, State v. James, 2000 UT 80, 13 P.3d 576, is now limited. This can be a … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Trespass | Comments Off on UT: Def succeeds on claim opening car door can be a 4A search, but loses on Davis good faith reliance on prior case

OH5: Def’s inordinate delay in finding car insurance card enabled reasonable dog sniff

The stop was delayed by defendant being unable to produce his proof of insurance, so the officer did not extend the stop to run a dog around the car during the wait. State v. Newman, 2021-Ohio-119, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s inordinate delay in finding car insurance card enabled reasonable dog sniff

E.D.Wash.: SW affidavit that failed to show PC on its face gets no GFE

The affidavit for the search warrant failed on its face to show probable cause for search of defendant’s house. Thus, the good faith exception doesn’t apply. United States v. Contreras-Aguilar, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9661 (E.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2021). … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: SW affidavit that failed to show PC on its face gets no GFE

D.Mass.: 15 month delay in getting SW for cell phone seized with PC was unreasonable, but GFE applies

The 15-month delay between seizure of a cell phone with probable cause is was unreasonable, applying United States v. Smith, 967 F.3d 198, 202 (2d Cir. 2020). However, the court finds that the good faith exception applies, and the court … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: 15 month delay in getting SW for cell phone seized with PC was unreasonable, but GFE applies

N.D.Ohio: Regular borrowing of a vehicle gave def standing when he had it; affidavit “bare bones” so no GFE

Defendant’s regular borrowing of a vehicle gave him standing in the vehicle when he was driving it. “In sum, the affidavit in support of the December 8, 2017 search warrant fails to provide the requisite ‘“nexus between the place to … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Regular borrowing of a vehicle gave def standing when he had it; affidavit “bare bones” so no GFE

CA4: Ptf’s claim the statute he was arrested under was unconstitutional is barred by DeFillippo

Plaintiff’s claim that his arrest and search was invalid because the statute under which he was stopped and arrested was unconstitutional is barred by Michigan v. DeFillippo. Quigley v. City of Huntington, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 760 (4th Cir. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf’s claim the statute he was arrested under was unconstitutional is barred by DeFillippo

CA5: Standard of review: GFE first, basis for finding PC second

“This court engages in a two-step inquiry when reviewing a district court’s denial of a defendant’s motion to suppress which challenges the sufficiency of a warrant. … First, this court determines whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule announced … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA5: Standard of review: GFE first, basis for finding PC second

NC: State statute on parole searches didn’t permit search of home, just the person

State statute authorized searches of the person or parolees, not places, and the search here exceeded the authority granted by statute, applying Samson v. California. State v. McCants, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 969 (Dec. 31, 2020). The search warrant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NC: State statute on parole searches didn’t permit search of home, just the person

CA11: Obscured LPN justified stop, even if statute was unconstitutionally vague

Defendant’s obscured LPN gave probable cause for the stop, even if the statute were to later prove to be unconstitutionally vague. The latter question is not decided. United States v. Sanchez, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 40243 (11th Cir. Dec. 23, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: Obscured LPN justified stop, even if statute was unconstitutionally vague

CA5: GFE applies to SW with outdated Google Map image but with correct address

The good faith exception applies to the officer’s accidentally using an outdated Google maps image in a search warrant application but with a correct actual address. “The circumstances make clear that [Officer] Herron’s mistake was an honest one-a far cry … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: GFE applies to SW with outdated Google Map image but with correct address

N.-M.: Broad cellphone search authorization was narrowed to emails and text messages and was particular

The command authorization for a search of defendant’s iPhone was reasonable and limited to files of emails, text messages, and search history as to his extramarital affairs before and after his wife’s death. A video found in an email was … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches, Particularity | Comments Off on N.-M.: Broad cellphone search authorization was narrowed to emails and text messages and was particular

CA11: Dist Ct acted within its discretion denying a suppression motion as untimely

Defense counsel waited past the pretrial motions deadline to file a motion to suppress complaining that he needed a state court transcript, but that hearing was long ago. The district court acted within its discretion in denying the motion for … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA11: Dist Ct acted within its discretion denying a suppression motion as untimely

D.Mont.: PC for SW based on CIs was lacking, but not so bad GFE shouldn’t apply

The affidavit for search warrant actually was deficient in showing probable cause from the CIs and the concerned citizen, but it wasn’t so lacking in probable cause that the good faith exception should not apply. United States v. Stanley, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Mont.: PC for SW based on CIs was lacking, but not so bad GFE shouldn’t apply