Hot Air: The Fourth Amendment wasn’t created to protect the guilty

Hot Air: The Fourth Amendment wasn’t created to protect the guilty by Jazz Shaw:
Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Hot Air: The Fourth Amendment wasn’t created to protect the guilty

N.D.Ga.: Running away from the getaway car is an abandonment

Officers had probable cause to search defendant’s car for DNA and other evidence connecting it to a bank robbery that the car was connected to. Aside from that, everybody in the car fled when it was stopped, and that’s an abandonment. Defendant argued that closing the doors wasn’t abandonment, but the court sees the car essentially as a disposable [my word, not the court’s] getaway car because the occupants switched cars. It was left unlocked with a window down. United States v. Hill, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81286 (N.D.Ga. March 28, 2016), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80932 (N.D. Ga. June 22, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Running away from the getaway car is an abandonment

S.D.Fla.: Asking a question about a debit card during a plain view not unreasonable

The police were called to defendant’s apartment by a “scream filled 911 call” needing an ambulance. Once inside, in plain view, officers saw a debit card with a name that didn’t belong to the occupants. Asking about it did not violate plain view. Officers already had at least reasonable suspicion something was up with the card. United States v. Dabrezil, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190812 (S.D.Fla. Nov. 27, 2013):
Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Asking a question about a debit card during a plain view not unreasonable

OH8: SW for “Apt. #1” with white door was valid where there was only one with a white door, albeit No. 3, and officers were directed by color of door

The description of the apartment with the white door on the corner of the building, “Apt. #1,” proved incorrect because Apt. #3 was the only one with a white door. The officers executing the warrant were directed to the one with the white door, not No. 1, and the warrant was sufficient. At any rate, it is saved by the good faith exception. State v. Jones, 2016-Ohio-4565, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2401 (8th Dist. June 23, 2016).

Defendant’s speeding justified his stop, and the officer found him under the influence. City of Cleveland Heights v. Brisbane, 2016-Ohio-4564, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2395 (8th Dist. June 23, 2016).*

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: SW for “Apt. #1” with white door was valid where there was only one with a white door, albeit No. 3, and officers were directed by color of door

D.P.R.: Criminal 4A violation proved by LEO being lookout on duty for robbery of recent ATF arrestee’s home

Defendant was a Puerto Rico police officer on a task force with the ATF. He worked the 4 pm to midnight shift, and he was involved as a police lookout to enable a condominium robbery to occur. He was convicted of conspiring to violate civil rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241, namely the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. He admitted the first element and challenged that the Fourth Amendment was involved or that his action as a lookout was state action. The court disagreed. The target of the robbery was a recent ATF arrestee, and the purpose was to steal his property that ATF learned he had. Moreover, he was on duty at the time he was the lookout to warn the robbers inside if police came by. Judgment of acquittal denied. United States v. Martinez-Mercado, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81129 (D.P.R. June 17, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Criminal 4A violation proved by LEO being lookout on duty for robbery of recent ATF arrestee’s home

OH4: Consent sought after telling def she was “good to go” was not the result of an unreasonable detention

Consent to search sought after the defendant was told she was “good to go” was not the result of an unreasonable detention and was consensual. State v. Davis, 2016-Ohio-3539, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2376 (4th Dist. June 14, 2016).

Nervousness of everybody in the car, inconsistent stories, and a blood stained napkin consistent with IV drug use was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop for a drug dog. State v. Balanik, 2016-Ohio-3511, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2357 (11th Dist. June 20, 2016).*

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH4: Consent sought after telling def she was “good to go” was not the result of an unreasonable detention

D.Md.: Fact the SW sought drugs necessarily permits a detailed search of small places; doesn’t make it a general warrant

The fact the search warrant sought drugs necessarily permits a detailed search of small places, but that doesn’t make it a general warrant. The good faith exception applies, too. United States v. Minnick, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80897 (D.Md. June 21, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth | Comments Off on D.Md.: Fact the SW sought drugs necessarily permits a detailed search of small places; doesn’t make it a general warrant

CA5: Handcuffing for refusal to show ID on school parking lot, without RS, didn’t violate “clearly established law”

Plaintiff drove to his wife’s school, with his daughter in the back seat, to pick his wife up from work. Some busybody citizen decided that the vehicle on school grounds was suspicious and called the police. The officer asked plaintiff for his ID, and he was mildly offended, having done nothing wrong. He attempted to call his attorney but the call didn’t get to the attorney, and he hung up. The officer then got him out of the car, handcuffed him, and waited for 30 minutes until his wife showed up. While the reasonable suspicion calculus here on the surface indicates that this was a seizure without reasonable suspicion, a Texas statute requires persons on school grounds identify themselves. Since constitutional rights are different on school grounds, the court can’t say that the officer violated clearly established law. Gonzalez v. Huerth, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11530 (5th Cir. June 23, 2016) (2-1).

A man counting money in the stairwell of a hotel with a prostitute working in it was reasonably believed to be her pimp. United States v. Davis, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80780 (E.D.Pa. June 21, 2016).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: Handcuffing for refusal to show ID on school parking lot, without RS, didn’t violate “clearly established law”

TX: No 4A claim for malicious prosecution

There is no Fourth Amendment claim, let alone a clearly established one, for malicious prosecution. If it exists in the constitution, it would be through due process. McIntyre v. El Paso Indep. Sch. Dist., 2016 Tex. LEXIS 568 (June 24, 2016) (dissent):
Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on TX: No 4A claim for malicious prosecution

NYLJ: Panel Upholds NYC Measure That Prohibits Biased Policing

NYLJ: Panel Upholds NYC Measure That Prohibits Biased Policing by Andrew Denney:

State law does not pre-empt a New York City law prohibiting discriminatory policing that was enacted in 2013 amid concerns about the NYPD’s increased reliance on stop-and-frisk tactics, a Manhattan appeals court ruled.

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NYLJ: Panel Upholds NYC Measure That Prohibits Biased Policing

Treatise 25% off through midnight

Go here.

For what it’s worth, my local USAO bought three copies when they were allowed to buy books again.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Treatise 25% off through midnight

CNS News: Liberal AG’s Climate Change Probes Abuse Fourth Amendment to Upend First Amendment

CNS News: Liberal AG’s Climate Change Probes Abuse Fourth Amendment to Upend First Amendment by Mark Fitzgibbons.

A subpoena for 40 years of records from Exxon about the environment is somehow equated with the Second Amendment (¶ 3, 1st sent.). The remedy is a motion to quash before a judge, which would likely be granted. The author recognizes that the case is in court.

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonableness, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CNS News: Liberal AG’s Climate Change Probes Abuse Fourth Amendment to Upend First Amendment

E.D.Va.: Another Playpen search of a home computer linked to the seized server approved

In another Playpen case, the Eastern District of Virginia approves hacking into a computer linked to a child pornography server. United States v. Matish, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82279 (E.D.Va. June 23, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Another Playpen search of a home computer linked to the seized server approved

E.D.Mich.: During traffic stop, CA6 says passengers may be asked for ID

“Additionally, the Sixth Circuit has held that it is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment for a police officer to ask a passenger for identification, even if there is no probable cause for a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing by the passengers. Thus, Kofhal had a right to obtain Defendant’s identification, even though he was a passenger. See e.g. United States v. Alexander, 467 F. App’x 355, 362 (6th Cir. 2012); United States v. Smith, 601 F.3d 530 (6th Cir.2010); United States v. Ellis, 497 F.3d 606, 613-14 (6th Cir.2007).” Thus, defendant had to expect, having no DL on him, his name and one of his DOBs he gave would be run through the state database. United States v. Gibbs, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21431 (E.D.Mich. Feb. 23, 2016).

Defendant’s stop was continued past 20 minutes on probable cause to believe that defendant was involved in drug trafficking. United States v. Ramirez-Jimenez, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11090 (4th Cir. June 20, 2016).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: During traffic stop, CA6 says passengers may be asked for ID

TN: 2½ minute questioning past the traffic ticket being issued wasn’t unreasonable

2½ minute questioning past the traffic ticket being issued wasn’t unreasonable. State v. Mansfield, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 450 (June 22, 2016).*

Defendant’s probation search was valid. “Thus, Agent Giselson’s knowledge of Dimes’ admitted unemployment, together with the large sum of cash in plain view that Dimes averred was from playing dice, which was possibly a form of illegal gambling, was sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, and therefore, the warrantless search of the defendant’s residence was valid.” State v. Dimes, 2016 La. App. LEXIS 1228 (La.App. 4 Cir. June 22, 2016).*

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: 2½ minute questioning past the traffic ticket being issued wasn’t unreasonable

NYTimes: Editorial: Policing the Police on Stop-and-Frisk

NYTimes: Editorial: Policing the Police on Stop-and-Frisk:

Three years have passed since a Federal District Court ruled that New York City’s stop-and-frisk program violated constitutional prohibitions against unreasonable search and seizure and discriminated against minority citizens, who were disproportionately and unjustifiably singled out for stops. A court-ordered reform process — overseen by an independent monitor — is off to a promising start. But some of the thorniest and most contentious issues lie ahead.

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NYTimes: Editorial: Policing the Police on Stop-and-Frisk

SCOTUS: Birchfield v. N.D.: refusing a blood test cannot result in charges

A breath test may be performed incident to an arrest without a warrant. A blood test requires a warrant or exigency. “Motorists may not be criminally punished for refusing to submit to a blood test based on legally implied consent to submit to them. It is one thing to approve implied-consent laws that impose civil penalties and evidentiary consequences on motorists who refuse to comply, but quite another for a State to insist upon an intrusive blood test and then to impose criminal penalties on refusal to submit. There must be a limit to the consequences to which motorists may be deemed to have consented by virtue of a decision to drive on public roads.” (syllabus)
Birchfield v. North Dakota, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 4058 (June 23, 2016)
Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, SCOTUS, Search incident, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Birchfield v. N.D.: refusing a blood test cannot result in charges

S.D.Miss.: Post-Jardines dog sniff of house and car leads to suppression of sniff of car, even though it’s not on curtilage

Officers did a dog sniff at defendant’s door after Jardines and then the car in the driveway. The car in the driveway is not on the curtilage, but the court suppresses because the sniff of the car was essentially an afterthought product of the sniff of the house. Also, the officer’s reports and his testimony aren’t consistent with each other. United States v. Maberry, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80529 (S.D.Miss. June 21, 2016).

Defendant’s pro se habeas claim is denied. Officers entered his apartment with the key provided by his mother to look for him in a shooting. He wasn’t there. They left and got a search warrant. Nothing about this was unreasonable, so no IAC. Grigsby v. State, 2016 Nev. LEXIS 553 (June 17, 2016).*

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Post-Jardines dog sniff of house and car leads to suppression of sniff of car, even though it’s not on curtilage

FL1: Knock-and-talk on motel room door didn’t need justification, but here it was because robbery getaway car was outside

Officers could conduct a knock-and-talk at a motel room door without reasonable suspicion based on the fact the getaway car from an armed robbery was in the parking lot. When the person opening the door was recognized as the robber from the store video, the officers had probable cause to enter on exigent circumstances and conduct a protective sweep. State v. McRae, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9500 (1st DCA June 21, 2016).

Defendant’s pro se argument on appeal that officers violated 39 C.F.R. 233.2(c)(1) on U.S. Postal Mail Covers was raised for the first time on appeal, so it is reviewed for plain error. What there is in the record on this shows the CI knew which post office defendant was using. The error, if it is one, is anything but plain. State v. McGuirk, 2016 W. Va. LEXIS 537 (June 17, 2016).*

Posted in Knock and talk | Comments Off on FL1: Knock-and-talk on motel room door didn’t need justification, but here it was because robbery getaway car was outside

OH2: Patdown unreasonable because it was for drugs not safety

Pat down was unreasonable because officer didn’t have any safety concerns and was looking for drugs. State v. Kinnison, 2016-Ohio-3481, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2337 (2d Dist. June 17, 2016).

Defendant was indicted, had a motion to suppress hearing, had the indictment dismissed on speedy trial grounds, was reindicted, had the prior suppression hearing reaffirmed in the second case, and it was appealed and affirmed. No relitigation in a 2255. United States v. Blevins, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79501 (W.D.La. May 5, 2016),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79498 (W.D. La. June 17, 2016).*

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH2: Patdown unreasonable because it was for drugs not safety