CA5: Handcuffing for refusal to show ID on school parking lot, without RS, didn’t violate “clearly established law”

Plaintiff drove to his wife’s school, with his daughter in the back seat, to pick his wife up from work. Some busybody citizen decided that the vehicle on school grounds was suspicious and called the police. The officer asked plaintiff for his ID, and he was mildly offended, having done nothing wrong. He attempted to call his attorney but the call didn’t get to the attorney, and he hung up. The officer then got him out of the car, handcuffed him, and waited for 30 minutes until his wife showed up. While the reasonable suspicion calculus here on the surface indicates that this was a seizure without reasonable suspicion, a Texas statute requires persons on school grounds identify themselves. Since constitutional rights are different on school grounds, the court can’t say that the officer violated clearly established law. Gonzalez v. Huerth, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11530 (5th Cir. June 23, 2016) (2-1).

A man counting money in the stairwell of a hotel with a prostitute working in it was reasonably believed to be her pimp. United States v. Davis, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80780 (E.D.Pa. June 21, 2016).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.