OH2: Patdown unreasonable because it was for drugs not safety

Pat down was unreasonable because officer didn’t have any safety concerns and was looking for drugs. State v. Kinnison, 2016-Ohio-3481, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2337 (2d Dist. June 17, 2016).

Defendant was indicted, had a motion to suppress hearing, had the indictment dismissed on speedy trial grounds, was reindicted, had the prior suppression hearing reaffirmed in the second case, and it was appealed and affirmed. No relitigation in a 2255. United States v. Blevins, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79501 (W.D.La. May 5, 2016),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79498 (W.D. La. June 17, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.