OH8: SW for “Apt. #1” with white door was valid where there was only one with a white door, albeit No. 3, and officers were directed by color of door

The description of the apartment with the white door on the corner of the building, “Apt. #1,” proved incorrect because Apt. #3 was the only one with a white door. The officers executing the warrant were directed to the one with the white door, not No. 1, and the warrant was sufficient. At any rate, it is saved by the good faith exception. State v. Jones, 2016-Ohio-4565, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2401 (8th Dist. June 23, 2016).

Defendant’s speeding justified his stop, and the officer found him under the influence. City of Cleveland Heights v. Brisbane, 2016-Ohio-4564, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2395 (8th Dist. June 23, 2016).*