Guam: Anonymous report of man in car with gun didn’t satisfy Navarette

Anonymous report of man with a gun in a car led to defendant’s stop, and the court finds it insufficient under Navarette because there was no allegation of a crime. People v. Mansapit, 2016 Guam 30, 2016 Guam LEXIS 28 (Oct. 24, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Guam: Anonymous report of man in car with gun didn’t satisfy Navarette

S.D.Ohio: Clause in SW that is overbroad requires def to show what was seized under it

One overbroad clause in the search warrant didn’t require exclusion of the rest that was specifically covered. Defendant also didn’t show that which was seized under the overbroad section to have it excluded. United States v. Traum, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146798 (S.D.Ohio Oct. 24, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Clause in SW that is overbroad requires def to show what was seized under it

VA: Filing wrong version of affidavit in the return fatal error under statute

The version of the affidavit filed with the clerk after the search was not the one issued by the judge, and this is a fatal error, considering the statute on the subject. The statute being violated, the Fourth Amendment doesn’t even come into play. Campbell v. Commonwealth, 2016 Va. App. LEXIS 277 (Oct. 25, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on VA: Filing wrong version of affidavit in the return fatal error under statute

CO: State didn’t prove necessity for impoundment of car for driving on a suspended DL

The state failed to prove that defendant’s driving on a suspended license justified impoundment and inventory of the car. The state didn’t offer evidence to show that defendant would drive off from the ticket or that he would imperil other drivers. There also was no offer to have someone else come and retrieve the car so it wouldn’t have to be towed. People v. Brown, 2016 COA 150, 2016 Colo. App. LEXIS 1488 (Oct. 20, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CO: State didn’t prove necessity for impoundment of car for driving on a suspended DL

UT: State failed to prove inevitable discovery after warrantless entry into home investigating hit and run accident

Two police officers went to defendant’s home because the LPN on the car involved in a hit and run came back to that address. At the house, the housekeeper greeted them and said that defendant probably was driving the car. The officers announced that no one was leaving. The entry into the house was not justified by inevitable discovery because the state could not show that they were going to get a warrant or that a warrant would even find what they were looking for. The motion to suppress the entry into the home should have been granted. Brierley v. Layton City, 2016 UT 46, 2016 Utah LEXIS 126 (Oct. 21, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on UT: State failed to prove inevitable discovery after warrantless entry into home investigating hit and run accident

D.Guam: Traffic ticket delayed by 20 min, but RS existed on collective knowledge

The officer delayed writing the traffic ticket in this case for 20 minutes after the report back on defendant’s license, so Rodriguez was seemingly violated. So, the question is reasonable suspicion. The collective knowledge doctrine, however, of reasonable suspicion gives enough to justify the length of detention. Defendants’ recorded conversations with the C.D. established at least reasonable suspicion that perhaps even rises to probable cause.” United States v. Martinez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147543 (D.Guam Oct. 25, 2016).

Defendant’s probation search was conducted by a probation officer, not at the request of a LEO, and was lawful, even if evidence gathering was the point. United States v. Morgan, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19036 (9th Cir. Oct. 21, 2016).*

Posted in Collective knowledge, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Guam: Traffic ticket delayed by 20 min, but RS existed on collective knowledge

ABAJ: Oregon civil rights lawyer files First [and Fourth] Amendment suit over surveillance of his Twitter account

ABAJ: Oregon civil rights lawyer files First Amendment suit over surveillance of his Twitter account by Debra Cassens Weiss:
Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on ABAJ: Oregon civil rights lawyer files First [and Fourth] Amendment suit over surveillance of his Twitter account

Center for Democracy and Technology: Supreme Court Should Speak Up on Cell Site Location Information

Center for Democracy and Technology: Supreme Court Should Speak Up on Cell Site Location Information by Natasha Duarte:
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on Center for Democracy and Technology: Supreme Court Should Speak Up on Cell Site Location Information

WaPo: The Volokh Conspiracy: The Fourth Amendment and email preservation letters

WaPo: The Volokh Conspiracy: The Fourth Amendment and email preservation letters by Orin Kerr:
Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on WaPo: The Volokh Conspiracy: The Fourth Amendment and email preservation letters

MD: Cell phones are so commonly involved in crimes that it’s now relatively easy to get a SW for one

Defendant was charged with child pornography: “I. Does an affiant’s assertion that ‘individuals who participate in [sex or drug] crimes communicate via cellular telephones, via text messages, calls, e-mails etc.,’ without more, provide a substantial basis to issue a search warrant for a cell phone?” Yes. Moats v. State, 2016 Md. App. LEXIS 148 (Oct. 25, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on MD: Cell phones are so commonly involved in crimes that it’s now relatively easy to get a SW for one

New law review article: Digital Duplications and the Fourth Amendment

Note, Digital Duplications and the Fourth Amendment, 129 Harv. L. Rev. 1046 (2016)

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on New law review article: Digital Duplications and the Fourth Amendment

Offline when on the road maybe from the DoS system attacks

First a cert petition due 10/25 and on the road for two CLEs. Back with more tomorrow after the last CLE. My system guy said it worked in Little Rock, but it wasn’t from Atlanta. Now in DC for NACDL’s Suppressing Evidence Seminar.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Offline when on the road maybe from the DoS system attacks

NPR: It Ain’t Me, Babe: Researchers Find Flaws In Police Facial Recognition

NPR: It Ain’t Me, Babe: Researchers Find Flaws In Police Facial Recognition by Laura Sydell:

Nearly half of all American adults have been entered into law enforcement facial recognition databases, according to a recent report from Georgetown University’s law school. But there are many problems with the accuracy of the technology that could have an impact on a lot of innocent people.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NPR: It Ain’t Me, Babe: Researchers Find Flaws In Police Facial Recognition

KS: A statute may grant more rights than the 4A and it should be followed

A statute may grant citizens more protection than the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution, and it must be followed. If state law is silent, then the Fourth Amendment or state constitution govern. City of Dodge City v. Webb, 2016 Kan. LEXIS 477 (Oct. 21, 2016) (see Treatise § 11.03 n.4):
Continue reading →

Posted in State constitution | Comments Off on KS: A statute may grant more rights than the 4A and it should be followed

WV: Def left jacket at friend’s house where he occasionally spent the night; no REP at the time of seizure

Defendant was an occasional overnight guest in the home of a friend. He left a jacket there in a common area, and the police seized it by the consent of the homeowner. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the jacket at the time it was found and seized. State v. Payne, 2016 W. Va. LEXIS 760 (Oct. 19, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WV: Def left jacket at friend’s house where he occasionally spent the night; no REP at the time of seizure

S.D.Ind.: Driving on a dead end road at night was RS

“[I]t was reasonable for Deputy Kirby to stop a car that matched the description of the suspects’ vehicle which was traveling on a dead end road that is rarely used in the nighttime, to investigate further. This reasoning further supports the Court’s conclusion that the stop and arrest were valid and substantiated by probable cause.” United States v. Mompie, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145174 (S.D.Ind. Oct. 20, 2016).*

On the totality of circumstances, the whole collection of facts, there was probable cause for the search of defendant’s car after drugs and cash had been found in other cars. United States v. Rios-Quintero, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145829 (D.Minn. Sept. 8, 2016),* adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145827 (D.Minn. Oct. 20, 2016).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Driving on a dead end road at night was RS

D.Minn.: Text messages provided nexus for SW for cell phone that produced CP

Defendant lived in the heated garage converted to a bedroom of a couple with two small children. One of the children said she was touched by defendant and they ordered him out of the house. Later, a search warrant was issued for his cell phone. The only nexus was text messages to the couple about what happened, and that was [barely] enough for the search warrant to issue, and then child pornography was validly found on the cell phone. United States v. Kilman, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145785 (D.Minn. Sept. 6, 2016).

Defendant was seized with reasonable suspicion and the seizure of defendant’s cell phone was also reasonable. It wasn’t searched until later with a warrant. United States v. Lawton, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146099 (D.Kan. Oct. 20, 2016).*

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Text messages provided nexus for SW for cell phone that produced CP

KS: Where law changed between 2001 appeal and this one to def’s benefit, harmless error applied

In the second appeal from a 1996 murder, the Fourth Amendment law changed between the first appeal in 2001 and this one by the 2004 decision in Groh v. Ramirez. The court concludes that law of the case doesn’t apply, Groh suggests the good faith exception does not apply [no mention of Davis good faith], and concludes the search is harmless error. State v. Kleypas, 2016 Kan. LEXIS 475 (Oct. 21, 2016) (167 page decision).

Another Playpen warrant sustained. United States v. Johnson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145630 (W.D.Mo. Aug. 16, 2016),* adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145180 (W.D.Mo. Oct. 20, 2016).*

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on KS: Where law changed between 2001 appeal and this one to def’s benefit, harmless error applied

MA: PC showing was close, but, essentially, ties go in support of the warrant

The trial court held that the affidavit for the search warrant did not show probable cause under Aguilar-Spinelli (still followed in Massachusetts), but the court of appeals disagrees and reverses. There were direct police observations that corroborated the informant’s story. It was a close case, but, on probable cause supporting a warrant, ties go to the police. Commonwealth v. Perez, 2016 Mass. App. LEXIS 154 (Oct. 21, 2016) (the baseball metaphor is mine, and used in the Treatise § 40.05 n.7):
Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on MA: PC showing was close, but, essentially, ties go in support of the warrant

OR: Bag of meth seen in car justified search incident

The officer here saw methamphetamine in a baggie in defendant’s car, and that justified a search incident for the “crime of arrest.” State v. Delfino, 281 Ore. App. 725 (Oct. 19, 2016).

The police came to defendant’s house with a search warrant for evidence of sex assault. His brother was put in charge of the house while he was in jail. The brother discovered an object sought in the warrant and called the police back. He had the requisite authority to consent to seizure of the item. People v. Lancaster, 2016 NY Slip Op 06904, 2016 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6761 (3d Dept. Oct. 20, 2016).

Posted in Consent, Search incident | Comments Off on OR: Bag of meth seen in car justified search incident