W.D.Ky.: SW particularity and the scope of search that occurred are separate “arguments [that] must not be confused”

The search warrant was particular, and the search was not overbroad, confined within the scope of the warrant. They are separate “arguments [that] must not be confused.” United States v. Aley, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59527 (W.D. Ky. Apr. 9, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Overseizure | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: SW particularity and the scope of search that occurred are separate “arguments [that] must not be confused”

PACER text entry

(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting Plaintiff’s motion to extend time 85. It appears Defendant R. Johnson refused service by mail 69. Plaintiff appears to believe the U.S. government should now go on search for Defendant Johnson comparable to the search for Bin Laden. I agree Defendant Johnson should not be allowed to evade service. But rather than employ Seal Team 6, I hereby deploy what some may consider to be even better – the U.S. Marshals Service. The Marshal is hereby directed to attempt to effectuate service of Defendant R. Johnson in person. The address under seal will be provided to the U.S. Marshal forthwith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/6/2018. (lej) (Entered: 04/09/2018)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on PACER text entry

Baltimore Sun: Opinion: Predicting more biased policing in Baltimore

Baltimore Sun: Opinion: Predicting more biased policing in Baltimore:

Police Commissioner Darryl De Sousa and Mayor Catherine Pugh recently announced measures meant to reduce violent crime in Baltimore, including ‘predictive policing,’ which they plan to be fully operational in the Eastern and Western districts by June 1 – less than two months from now. But the method poses its own set of bias issues, which Baltimoreans should be aware of before it is implemented by the Baltimore Police Department.

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on Baltimore Sun: Opinion: Predicting more biased policing in Baltimore

US News & World Report: Judge: NYPD Cellphone Tracking Tech to Remain Secret

US News & World Report: Judge: NYPD Cellphone Tracking Tech to Remain Secret by AP:

The New York Police Department won’t have to release details about its portable cellphone tracking system commonly known as Stingrays.”

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on US News & World Report: Judge: NYPD Cellphone Tracking Tech to Remain Secret

NYTimes: Opinion: Don’t Let the Police Wreck Stop-and-Frisk Reforms

NYTimes: Opinion: Don’t Let the Police Wreck Stop-and-Frisk Reforms:

We won the stop-and-frisk case in 2013, when a federal court ruled the New York City Police Department’s use of the practice was unconstitutional. But as the lawyers in the case, our work isn’t done. Ultimate victory depends on whether we reform the police practices that drove unlawful stops and arrests. In the court-ordered reform process, improvements to police discipline and supervision are on the chopping block. Without these changes, we fear unlawful stops will explode again.

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NYTimes: Opinion: Don’t Let the Police Wreck Stop-and-Frisk Reforms

NH: Warrantless DNA testing of blood obtained from hospital if error was harmless

Defendant was driving in a car crash that critically injured him and his passenger. He came to the ER, and the hospital drew five vials of blood for diagnostic testing for his condition. At the hearing all that it would show for basic treatment was discussed. The police sought a vial for testing. The blood draw was not state action. The state sought a search warrant for a DNA test to prove that hair in the driver’s side windshield was defendant’s to prove he was driving, and a judge wouldn’t sign it because the state already had the blood and could test it. It was harmless error at best based on the rest of the evidence. State v. Bazinet, 2018 N.H. LEXIS 23 (Apr. 10, 2018).*

A former county jail inmate sued alleging that his First Amendment rights were violated by a search warrant for all his jail email. After his claim was dismissed on SOL grounds, he appealed and added a Fourth Amendment claim. It fails from not being pled below [aside from the fact it was frivolous, something not decided]. Peterson v. Ostrander, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 8902 (6th Cir. Apr. 6, 2018).*

Defendant plead guilty without reserving any issue for a conditional plea, so it’s waived. State v. Bookheimer, 2018 W. Va. LEXIS 248 (Apr. 9, 2018) (memorandum).*

Posted in DNA, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NH: Warrantless DNA testing of blood obtained from hospital if error was harmless

M.D.Tenn.: Even if Karo didn’t permit monitoring a tracker on a package brought into the house, there was PC anyway

Even if Karo required excising or excluding the statement in the affidavit for search warrant that the package was in the target residence for the anticipatory warrant, there was probable cause without it, so it doesn’t matter. United States v. Ijiyode, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59916 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 9, 2018).

Defendant was not in custody for Miranda purposes when he made incriminating statements during the search of his home and business. He was told he was free to leave. He didn’t, and that’s a weighty factor against him being in custody. United States v. Luther, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59873 (D. Minn. Apr. 9, 2018).*

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails for lack of an allegation of materiality of the alleged falsity. United States v. Morris, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 8907 (9th Cir. Apr. 9, 2018).*

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Franks doctrine, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Even if Karo didn’t permit monitoring a tracker on a package brought into the house, there was PC anyway

M.D.Ala.: Emergency aid exception doesn’t apply to justify entry where victims are accounted for outside

The government didn’t meet its burden of showing the emergency aid exception applied where all the purported victims were accounted for and outside the apartment they wanted to search. The protective sweep doctrine as an alternative doesn’t apply here because that requires the police be on the premises lawfully in the first place. United States v. Turner, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59923 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 9, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Emergency aid exception doesn’t apply to justify entry where victims are accounted for outside

Family emergency took me away. New cases again tomorrow

As soon as I get back I have to prepare for a 5 pm hearing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Family emergency took me away. New cases again tomorrow

Cato: Introducing “Checkpoint: America”

Cato: Introducing “Checkpoint: America” by Patrick G. Eddington
Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on Cato: Introducing “Checkpoint: America”

Reuters: Law firm raids bode ill for lawyers and their clients – legal experts

Reuters: Law firm raids bode ill for lawyers and their clients – legal experts by Alison Frankel:
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reuters: Law firm raids bode ill for lawyers and their clients – legal experts

Volokh Conspiracy: In Decryption Cases, Don’t Forget the Fourth Amendment

Volokh Conspiracy: In Decryption Cases, Don’t Forget the Fourth Amendment by Orin Kerr:
Requiring a search warrant isn’t everything. But it isn’t nothing.
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: In Decryption Cases, Don’t Forget the Fourth Amendment

Wired: DC’s Stingray Mess Won’t Get Cleaned Up

Wired: DC’s Stingray Mess Won’t Get Cleaned Up by Lily Hay Newman:
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on Wired: DC’s Stingray Mess Won’t Get Cleaned Up

OH8: Administrative PC shown for sewer water search

The city justified issuance of an administrative warrant for investigation of sewer water contamination under Camara. Administrative probable cause was shown, and the search was reasonable. Dawson v. City of Richmond Heights, 2018-Ohio-1301, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 1440 (8th Dist. Apr. 6, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on OH8: Administrative PC shown for sewer water search

E.D.Va.: Having been kicked out of a hotel room and leaving, defs essentially abandoned that which was left behind

Defendants were kicked out of a hotel room for strange and aggressive behavior toward staff, and they hurriedly left. The hotel opened the room to the police and they found drug paraphernalia and, in the toilet, ammunition. There no longer was any reasonable expectation of privacy in the room. [It could also be abandonment.] United States v. Seay, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58264 (E.D. Va. Apr. 5, 2018).*

As to the search issue, defendant’s 2255 is a relitigation of the issue already tried by this court and affirmed on appeal. It’s thus barred. United States v. Shrader, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57182 (N.D. Okla. Apr. 4, 2018).*

Defendant consented to a search of his book bag after an officer asked what was in it. He was not in custody at the time. State v. Benton, 2018-Ohio-1296, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 1421 (8th Dist. Apr. 5, 2018).*

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Having been kicked out of a hotel room and leaving, defs essentially abandoned that which was left behind

Volokh Conspiracy: Two New Cases on Decrypting Locked Devices by Orin Kerr

Volokh Conspiracy: Two New Cases on Decrypting Locked Devices by Orin Kerr
One on the Fifth Amendment, and one on Miranda. Both correctly decided, I think.
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: Two New Cases on Decrypting Locked Devices by Orin Kerr

IL: Def’s actions after stop to inquire rose to RS

Police encountered defendant and others in a car in a neighborhood where it didn’t seem to belong. The officers pulled up next to their car and talked. Based on furtive movements, the officer believed that defendant had a gun he was moving his arm to cover. He also slouched down to where his head was all that was visible. The officer ordered them out of the car, and then the officer heard a gun fall. The stop was not unreasonable and based on reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot. People v. Gomez, 2018 IL App (1st) 150605, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS 199 (Apr. 3, 2018).*

The government contends defendant fled from the car he was driving when it was stopped and he tossed the keys. So, defendant: show your standing, and file a brief. United States v. Youmans, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58350 (S.D. Ga. Apr. 5, 2018).*

The court finds that defendant gave the password to defendant’s cell phone after a proffer session for the purpose of giving it to government. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective. United States v. Daniells, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57925 (D. Mass. Apr. 5, 2018).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on IL: Def’s actions after stop to inquire rose to RS

OH9: GPS tracking previously imposed for parole wasn’t a violation of 4A

GPS tracking as a condition of parole was based in substantial part on findings in a prior sentencing involving defendant, and that did not violate the Fourth Amendment in imposing those release conditions. That GPS information was used in this case, and it wasn’t unreasonable. State v. Hendon, 2018-Ohio-1284, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 1409 (9th Dist. Apr. 4, 2018).*

Defendant’s motion to suppress is denied without a hearing or response from the state. The affidavit for the search warrant shows probable cause in its four corners. State v. Hale, 2018 Del. Super. LEXIS 153 (Apr. 6, 2018).*

Defendant filed a 2255 against defense counsel for allegedly being ineffective in pursuing his motion to suppress, and it was denied in a comprehensive opinion. The COA is denied. United States v. Hopson, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 8734 (10th Cir. Apr. 6, 2018).*

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH9: GPS tracking previously imposed for parole wasn’t a violation of 4A

CA11: Ten officers for a “knock and talk” violated Jardines, but it wasn’t the cause of the search of the house

Ten officers approaching defendant’s house for a “knock-and-talk” violated Jardines, but that doesn’t matter because it didn’t lead to the discovery of evidence. Defendant didn’t see them, and he opened the door in response to the knock. Then the officer at the door saw drugs and paraphernalia right behind him. There was a protective sweep, but there was a search warrant based on the initial view, and that was an independent source. United States v. Maxi, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 8595 (11th Cir. Apr. 5, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Independent source, Knock and talk | Comments Off on CA11: Ten officers for a “knock and talk” violated Jardines, but it wasn’t the cause of the search of the house

TN: There’s normally no reason why the judge that issued the SW would be a witness at a suppression hearing on a Franks motion

The judge that issued the search warrant is not required to recuse from being the trial judge, so there was no ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to raise that issue. Moreover, the issuing judge would not be a witness at a suppression hearing in a Franks challenge. “We see no need, under normal circumstances, why the judge who issued the search warrant is a needed witness at a Franks hearing.” Also, judges who issue search warrants often handle the suppression hearings. Defendant’s Franks challenge is moot because the search warrant didn’t matter–there was probable cause and exigent circumstances for the automobile exception. Harris v. State, 2018 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 266 (Apr. 6, 2018).

Defendant had a full and fair opportunity to litigate his search issue in state court and did. Therefore, his 2254 claim is barred. Norris v. Noble, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57922 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 5, 2018).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on TN: There’s normally no reason why the judge that issued the SW would be a witness at a suppression hearing on a Franks motion