NE: A motion in limine is not a substitute for a motion to suppress

“A suppression hearing is preparatory, because it relates to auxiliary issues not immediately relevant to the question of guilt and is held in anticipation of certain evidence being introduced at a forthcoming trial.” A motion in limine is not a substitute. By not filing a motion to suppress, defendant waived it. State v. Cotton, 299 Neb. 650, 2018 Neb. LEXIS 74 (Apr. 21, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NE: A motion in limine is not a substitute for a motion to suppress

The Crime Report: Facial Recognition Software: Coming Soon to Your Local Retailer?

The Crime Report: Facial Recognition Software: Coming Soon to Your Local Retailer? by Nick Coult:

Shoplifting is harmless, right? It’s nothing more than a victimless petty crime. Besides, it doesn’t really hurt the retailers because they just write off their losses. Shoplifters don’t even face jail time. If you believe these so-called ‘facts,’ you are buying into the myths surrounding shoplifting that have very little to do with the reality of the crime.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Crime Report: Facial Recognition Software: Coming Soon to Your Local Retailer?

CAAF: Inevitable discovery and lack of bad faith saved AFOSI’s exceeding scope of search authorization

AFOSI officers exceed the military search authorization which omitted defendant’s bags. They’d sought a search of the bags and it was within the confines of the affidavit. There was no bad faith, and they were actively investigating pursuing leads on defendant for falsifying records to take money from the government. Inevitable discovery is applied “to the narrow circumstances … in this case.” United States v. Eppes, 2018 CAAF LEXIS 202 (Apr. 10, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CAAF: Inevitable discovery and lack of bad faith saved AFOSI’s exceeding scope of search authorization

N.D.Cal.: Lyft drivers didn’t state a claim for invasion of privacy from taking of geolocation data that was shared on an app

Plaintiff Lyft drivers sued Uber for invasion of privacy and other claims. Plaintiff did not state an invasion of privacy claim from using an app on their phone that tracked them. He didn’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their geolocation data because the passengers also shared it. Gonzales v. Uber Techs., Inc., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65561 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Lyft drivers didn’t state a claim for invasion of privacy from taking of geolocation data that was shared on an app

D.N.M.: RS can start as one thing and become something else

An officer on regular patrol saw defendant peering in a church window when there were no services. The officer stopped to inquire and defendant’s activity turned to suspicious for possessing a weapon. Reasonable suspicion can shift from one thing to another. United States v. Romero, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65982 (D. N.M. Apr. 19, 2018).

Defendant was going to trial for interfering with a law enforcement officer. The preliminary question of reasonable suspicion was decided by the trial court and was not a question for the jury in a criminal case. Jones v. State, 2018 Ind. App. LEXIS 144 (Apr. 21, 2018).

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: RS can start as one thing and become something else

New law review article: Notice and Standing in the Fourth Amendment: Searches of Personal Data

Jennifer Daskal, Notice and Standing in the Fourth Amendment: Searches of Personal Data, 26 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 437 (2017). Abstract:
Continue reading →

Posted in Standing, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on New law review article: Notice and Standing in the Fourth Amendment: Searches of Personal Data

S.D.N.Y.: Parole search was valid despite def being in jail at time

Defendant was on parole and allegedly shot at somebody. That justified a parole search of his residence. The fact he was in jail at the time didn’t matter. United States v. Jaiman, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64797 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. 18, 2018). [Caution: This is a plausible conclusion from the opinion, but it’s not perfectly clear; not that that doesn’t keep a court from finding it plausible authority in the future.]

The district court erred in summarily dismissing plaintiff’s complaint that officers stopped his car and searched his person without any justification at all. It plausibly stated a claim and discovery will have to proceed. Floyd v. City of Miami Beach, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 9896 (11th Cir. Apr. 19, 2018).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Parole search was valid despite def being in jail at time

The Reporter: Columnist: Answers to privacy concerns depend on philosophical approach

The Reporter: Columnist: Answers to privacy concerns depend on philosophical approach by Richard Bammer:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Reporter: Columnist: Answers to privacy concerns depend on philosophical approach

CSO Online: Cops go into funeral home, attempt to unlock phone with dead man’s fingerprint

Not the first time, and certainly not the last:

CSO Online: Cops go into funeral home, attempt to unlock phone with dead man’s fingerprint by Ms. Smith:

Even if the cops can’t be legally accused of violating a dead man’s Fourth Amendment rights, Victoria Armstrong, Phillip’s fiancé, was at the Sylvan Abbey Funeral Home in Clearwater when the two detectives showed up and attempted to use his corpse to unlock his phone.
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CSO Online: Cops go into funeral home, attempt to unlock phone with dead man’s fingerprint

E.D.Cal.: Alleged search of a public computer in a library for ptf’s usage didn’t violate any REP

Alleged search of a public computer in a college library for information about plaintiff’s use of it doesn’t violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. Berry v. Yosemite Cmty. College Dist., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64732 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2018).

Another Playpen warrant sustained. United States v. Sasiadek, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64587 (W.D. N.Y. Apr. 17, 2018).*

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Alleged search of a public computer in a library for ptf’s usage didn’t violate any REP

W.D.N.Y.: “Affidavit of personal knowledge” to show standing isn’t satisfied by the officer’s police reports

The Second Circuit requires an affidavit of personal knowledge to establish standing to contest a search. The officer’s report wasn’t enough just because the officer believed that defendant’s residence was the target of the search. United States v. Lewis, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64892 (W.D. N.Y. Apr 18, 2018).*

Driver unauthorized on the rental contract and the vehicle was overdue has no standing. As to the search of defendant’s residence, the court exercises its discretion to consider the good faith exception instead of probable cause. Because the search warrant affidavit isn’t “bare bones,” the good faith exception applies. United States v. Miller, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65214 (D. S.C. Apr. 18, 2018).*

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: “Affidavit of personal knowledge” to show standing isn’t satisfied by the officer’s police reports

D.Mass.: Def made his Franks challenge at the suppression hearing; statement was reckless and completely undermined nexus to house

Defendant showed enough to get a Franks hearing. United States v. Roman, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167167, 2017 WL 4517963 (D. Mass. Oct. 10, 2017). “Following the Franks hearing—which occurred on multiple days spread out between November of 2017 and January of 2018—the court will grant Defendant’s motion to suppress as to the search of his business. The court finds the Government committed a series of easily avoidable errors which, combined with the admittedly high risk of the harm that occurred here, amounted to reckless disregard for the truth. In addition, the court finds that the “reformed’ affidavit fails to establish probable cause to search Defendant’s business. As a result, the warrant to search Defendant’s business ‘must be voided and the fruits of the search excluded to the same extent as if probable cause was lacking on the face of the affidavit.’ Franks, 438 U.S. at 156.” United States v. Roman, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65274 (D. Mass. Apr. 18, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Def made his Franks challenge at the suppression hearing; statement was reckless and completely undermined nexus to house

IN: Recording a recording off a Facebook account doesn’t violate the federal wiretap law

Defendant was accused of breaking into his ex-girlfriend’s apartment and stealing her work iPad and other personal things. She signed on to his Facebook account with a password he’d previously given her. She found a recording there which admitted he had the iPad. Her recording the recording did not violate the federal wiretap law. Sparks v. State, 2018 Ind. App. LEXIS 139 (Apr. 18, 2018).

Defendant fled from a vehicle in a red jacket. When he was finally apprehended, he wasn’t wearing it. Officers found it, and it’s abandoned property. State v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-1444, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 1588 (3d Dist. Apr. 16, 2018).*

Posted in Abandonment, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on IN: Recording a recording off a Facebook account doesn’t violate the federal wiretap law

WaPo: Opinion: ‘The Watch’ blog: Lunch links: Louisiana attorney general approves of arresting people who threaten to file police complaints

WaPo: Opinion: ‘The Watch’ blog: Lunch links: Louisiana attorney general approves of arresting people who threaten to file police complaints by Radley Balko:
Continue reading →

Posted in Police misconduct | Comments Off on WaPo: Opinion: ‘The Watch’ blog: Lunch links: Louisiana attorney general approves of arresting people who threaten to file police complaints

NJ: DV seizure order and SW issued; dismissal of DV matter doesn’t affect independent SW

Family court DV search warrant was adequate and helped support an additional search warrant by the criminal court. There was probable cause. The ultimate dismissal of the DV petition had no legal effect on the validity of the search warrant. State v. Hemenway, 2018 N.J. Super. LEXIS 57 (Apr. 16, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NJ: DV seizure order and SW issued; dismissal of DV matter doesn’t affect independent SW

DE: “The scope of the warrant so far outruns that probable cause finding—and is so lacking in particularity relative to that probable cause finding—that it qualifies as plain error.”

A rare outcome: “The scope of the warrant so far outruns that probable cause finding—and is so lacking in particularity relative to that probable cause finding—that it qualifies as plain error.” Buckham v. State, 2018 Del. LEXIS 166 (Apr. 18, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on DE: “The scope of the warrant so far outruns that probable cause finding—and is so lacking in particularity relative to that probable cause finding—that it qualifies as plain error.”

S.D.Fla.: The fact FL law provides a reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records has nothing to do with an IRS summons

The fact Florida law provides a reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records has nothing to do with an IRS summons for bank records. Presley & Presley P.A. v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65421 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 16, 2018). (Why wouldn’t a law firm know that? Virginia v. Moore.)

The CI’s story included only a first name, but the police corroborated who it was and the apartment she lived in. On defendant’s Franks challenge, further detail that defendant claims was omitted would have only bolstered the probable cause. Five day old information was not stale in a drug case. None of the factors for applying Leon’s good faith exception appear. The warrant is valid, and the officers could rely on it in good faith. United States v. Henry, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65438 (D. Neb. Apr. 18, 2018).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: The fact FL law provides a reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records has nothing to do with an IRS summons

Wired: Why Police Should Monitor Social Media to Prevent Crime

Wired: Why Police Should Monitor Social Media to Prevent Crime by Christopher Raleigh Bousquet (opinion):
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Wired: Why Police Should Monitor Social Media to Prevent Crime

CA11: Financial fraud SW permits search of def’s wallet on his person

In a search warrant for financial fraud of defendant’s house, finding defendant there allowed a search of his wallet under the warrant. United States v. Shabazz, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 9774 (11th Cir. Apr. 18, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on CA11: Financial fraud SW permits search of def’s wallet on his person

CA11: While time wasn’t clearly stated, it was inferred on the totality; therefore, not stale

While the affidavit for the search warrant didn’t clearly specify a time frame, it was inferred, and it was clearly reasonable to conclude on the totality that the defendant would still have the sought after images on his computer. United States v. Kirkham, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 9799 (11th Cir. Apr. 16, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on CA11: While time wasn’t clearly stated, it was inferred on the totality; therefore, not stale