N.D.Ind.: It’s settled one can’t relitigate merits of 4A claim via 2254 habeas

This 2254 is merely an attempt to relitigate his Fourth Amendment claim in habeas, and thus it’s barred. “In his traverse, Thomas has not argued or attempted to demonstrate that there was a subversion of the hearing process in state court. Instead, he focuses on the merits of his Fourth Amendment claim and asks me to reconsider the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision, a path that is foreclosed by Stone. Hayes v. Battaglia, 403 F.3d 935, 939 (7th Cir. 2005). Thomas’s claim is simply not cognizable on federal habeas review. See e.g., Turentine v. Miller, 80 F.3d 222 at 225-226 (7th Cir. 1996) (‘We have consistently held that a claim is Stone-barred if the petitioner simply argues that the state court made a mistake in applying Fourth Amendment law.’).” Thomas v. Warden, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16347 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 1, 2019).*

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: It’s settled one can’t relitigate merits of 4A claim via 2254 habeas

Digital Trends: As law enforcement gets increasingly high-tech, is privacy being compromised?

Digital Trends: As law enforcement gets increasingly high-tech, is privacy being compromised? by Jules Suzdaltsev:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Digital Trends: As law enforcement gets increasingly high-tech, is privacy being compromised?

D.D.C.: Officers’ testimony about smell of PCP was too equivocal to be reliable

The officers’ testimony about allegedly smelling PCP when they stopped defendant was too equivocal through the hearing to be reliable. A patdown of defendant off that alleged smell produced a gun in his pocket. Defendant’s alleged consent to the patdown wasn’t voluntary. United States v. Smith, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14781 (D.D.C. Jan. 30, 2019).*

A package arriving at JFK from overseas was properly subjected to a border search. Then, the product of that search could become the basis of an anticipatory warrant. Defendant conflates the probable cause requirement and anticipatory warrants where the probable cause would come into existence with the triggering event. The affidavit for the search warrant shows probable cause for the anticipatory warrant and the cell phones. United States v. Lora, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13292 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2019).*

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Border search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Officers’ testimony about smell of PCP was too equivocal to be reliable

ABAJ: Lawyer’s suit says FaceTime bug allowed secret recording of deposition, caused emotional trauma

ABAJ: Lawyer’s suit says FaceTime bug allowed secret recording of deposition, caused emotional trauma bY Debra Cassens Weiss:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ABAJ: Lawyer’s suit says FaceTime bug allowed secret recording of deposition, caused emotional trauma

CA9: The federal appropriation statute against prosecution in MMJ cases is not an immunity from SW

In the face of the state’s medical marijuana law, the search warrant for defendant’s property was based on federal law not state law. The federal appropriations clause against prosecution in medical marijuana cases is not immunity. “The two cases that Campbell cites–Commonwealth v. Canning, 28 N.E.3d 1156 (Mass. 2015), and United States v. Kleinman, 880 F.3d 1020, 1036-37 (9th Cir. 2017)–are inapposite, because they involved search warrants obtained by state or local law enforcement and based on probable cause to believe that the defendants had violated state drug laws.” United States v. Campbell, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 3074 (9th Cir. Jan. 30, 2019).

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA9: The federal appropriation statute against prosecution in MMJ cases is not an immunity from SW

AR: Isolated comment at trial from police witness defendant wouldn’t give up cell phone password didn’t require reversal; jury admonished on right not to

An isolated trial comment from a witness that the officer couldn’t access a cell phone without the password wasn’t prejudicial. Also, the parties agreed that an admonition that defendant had a constitutional right to not give it was given. Lewis v. State, 2019 Ark. App. 43, 2019 Ark. App. LEXIS 54 (Jan. 30, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on AR: Isolated comment at trial from police witness defendant wouldn’t give up cell phone password didn’t require reversal; jury admonished on right not to

CA5: 9 day delay in getting SW for cell phone wasn’t unreasonable

The search warrant reasonably authorized seizure of defendant’s cell phone but not its search. The nine day delay in getting the search warrant for the phone was not unreasonable. The court declines to adopt a bright line rule and goes with reasonableness. Defendant’s not seeking return of the phone before the search warrant is a factor in reasonableness. United States v. Fulton, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 2961 (5th Cir. Jan. 25, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA5: 9 day delay in getting SW for cell phone wasn’t unreasonable

CA6: No showing insurance company’s investigative report was cause of his arrest; also didn’t plead state action

Plaintiff sued his insurance company for participating in his false arrest because they submitted their own investigative file to law enforcement. There is no evidence that law enforcement didn’t conduct its own independent analysis of what they received. In addition, plaintiff didn’t plead state action for the insurance company for § 1983. Waad v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 3051 (6th Cir. Jan. 30, 2019).*

No good cause shown for filing a motion to suppress out of time. United States v. Seigler, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13735 (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2019).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA6: No showing insurance company’s investigative report was cause of his arrest; also didn’t plead state action

CA2: Def parole officer gets QI on whether 4A or NY case law applies to parole search

Plaintiff was subjected to a parole search, and he contended New York law applied rather than Samson et al. The officer gets qualified immunity on the question because it appears Samson should but we don’t even need to resolve it. He gets judgment as a matter of law on bringing law enforcement officers along with him because that has already been held reasonable. Black v. Petitinato, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 3021 (2d Cir. Jan. 30, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Def parole officer gets QI on whether 4A or NY case law applies to parole search

N.D.Ala.: No Franks proffer so motion fails

“In this case, the defendant has not attempted to make any preliminary showing that the information contained in the application/affidavit was knowingly or recklessly false. The closest he comes to doing so is the assertion that the application/affidavit avers that ‘pills’ (plural) were found in the car when, in fact, only one Alprazolam pill was found.” Thus, there is no proffer, and the Franks motion fails without a hearing. United States v. De Aza, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13286 (N.D. Ala. Jan. 4, 2019).*

The trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion to suppress. There was objective evidence of traffic offenses justifying the stop. State v. Levine, 2019-Ohio-265, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 264 (4th Dist. Jan. 28, 2019).*

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: No Franks proffer so motion fails

N.D.Tex.: 2254 habeas 4A IAC claim denied; state court applied right rules and finding not objectively unreasonable

Defendant’s federal habeas is denied on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel as to his search. “The state court applied the proper legal standard and, deferring to the state court’s factual findings, including the court’s credibility determinations, the court’s application of that standard is not objectively unreasonable. Petitioner’s claims are largely conclusory, with no legal and/or evidentiary basis, involve state evidentiary rulings or other matters of state law, involve strategic and tactical decisions made by counsel, or would have required counsel to make frivolous motions or objections, all of which generally do not entitle a state petitioner to federal habeas relief. See, e.g., Strickland, 460 U.S. at 689 (holding strategic decisions by counsel are virtually unchallengeable and generally do not provide a basis for postconviction relief on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel); ….” Card v. Davis, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13795 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2019).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: 2254 habeas 4A IAC claim denied; state court applied right rules and finding not objectively unreasonable

PA: There’s no right to a warning before fleeing from the police during a stop

Defendant had no right to a warning before he fled from police when he was stopped. “Here, as a practical matter, it is not all clear that police had a reasonable opportunity to issue Dunham verbal commands directing his movement. To the contrary, in our view, Dunham’s preemptive flight negated any opportunity for police to verbally exercise their authority. Under these circumstances, we decline to reward Dunham for his preemptive flight or, more generally, require that police issue additional, verbal commands to an individual, already lawfully seized, prior to their pursuit of him.” Commonwealth v. Dunham, 2019 PA Super 20, 2019 Pa. Super. LEXIS 68 (Jan. 29, 2019).

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for allegedly mishandling a Franks motion. It would have failed because it was based on the wrong legal theory: Franks applies to false statements of the officer, not the CI. Burdick v. Kline, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13836 (D. Kan. Jan. 29, 2019).*

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on PA: There’s no right to a warning before fleeing from the police during a stop

N.D.Ind.: Halfway litigating a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to later suit

Defendant first litigated his suppression issue in state court and lost. He didn’t appeal, and it became final. That’s collateral estoppel to a civil case over the same search. Freeman v. Indiana, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13863 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 29, 2019).

After defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim was affirmed on appeal, he couldn’t raise the same ground in federal habeas because of res judicata. Johnson v. Racki, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13227 (D. Mont. Jan. 22, 2019).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Halfway litigating a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to later suit

D.Minn.: Govt showed nexus to def’s cell phones in vehicle involved in a shooting

Defendant’s vehicle was factually connected to a shooting incident, and that gave probable cause to search it under the automobile exception. There was nexus to defendant’s cell phones found in the vehicle to get a separate search warrant for them. United States v. Woods, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12820 (D. Minn. Jan. 28, 2019)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Govt showed nexus to def’s cell phones in vehicle involved in a shooting

S.D.Ill.: Merely living in a house and being alleged to be a criminal doesn’t create nexus; more is required, and the govt had it here

It is settled in this circuit that merely because a person lives in a house doesn’t create a nexus to the house for crime; more is required. Here, the government gets over that hurdle. Defendant was overheard talking about having a pipe bomb and having detonated another the day before, and there was an explosion the day before. Based on the ongoing nature of the offense, there was nexus. United States v. Matthews, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13233 (S.D. Ill. Jan. 28, 2019).*

The government got a Facebook warrant that was based on probable cause of probably child pornography, and the USMJ in Kansas had Rule 41 jurisdiction even though Facebook is located in California. The warrant was not stale because the information was six months old. Email search warrant for child pornography have been based on far longer times. United States v. Rogers, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12985 (D. Kan. Jan. 28, 2019).*

Posted in Nexus, Social media warrants, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Merely living in a house and being alleged to be a criminal doesn’t create nexus; more is required, and the govt had it here

CA4: Bodycam video shows consent to enter and statement made were voluntary

The government had consent to enter defendant’s home, and he was convicted of illegal entry and deported. The bodycam video supports the finding of voluntary consent. United States v. Azua-Rinconada, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 2783 (4th Cir. Jan. 28, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Consent | Comments Off on CA4: Bodycam video shows consent to enter and statement made were voluntary

D.Minn.: Def’s Franks challenge had no offer of proof and thus was a mere complaint without support

Defendant’s Franks challenge to the search warrant wasn’t specific and was actually a mere “complain[t]” without an offer of proof, and that’s just not enough. United States v. Yackel, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12819 (D. Minn. Jan. 28, 2019)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def’s Franks challenge had no offer of proof and thus was a mere complaint without support

NYT: iPhone FaceTime Bug That Allows Spying Was Flagged to Apple Over a Week Ago

NYT: iPhone FaceTime Bug That Allows Spying Was Flagged to Apple Over a Week Ago by Nicole Perlroth:

SAN FRANCISCO — On Jan. 19, Grant Thompson, a 14-year-old in Arizona, made an unexpected discovery: Using FaceTime, Apple’s video chatting software, he could eavesdrop on his friend’s phone before his friend had even answered the call.
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYT: iPhone FaceTime Bug That Allows Spying Was Flagged to Apple Over a Week Ago

CA7: Exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of federal supervised release

The exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of federal supervised release, applying Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357 (1998). United States v. Phillips, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 2799 (7th Cir. Jan. 28, 2019).

CSLI obtained in January 2017 is admissible by the good faith exception. Defendant’s attempt to show Carpenter is not new law on the third-party doctrine to get around this is rejected. United States v. Taylor, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13117 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 7, 2019), adopted, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12773 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 28, 2019).*

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA7: Exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of federal supervised release

E.D.Ky.: Disagreement with some of the facts of the alleged PC doesn’t undermine it; it might be relevant at trial

Defendant’s disagreement with some of the facts that led to his arrest didn’t undermine the probable cause and search incident. They may be relevant at trial, but probable cause still exists. United States v. Hawkins, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12033 (E.D. Ky. Jan. 25, 2019).*

Defendant failed to show any false statements, let alone material ones, in the affidavit for the search warrant. Thus, defense counsel couldn’t be ineffective. United States v. Carter, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11841 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2019).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Disagreement with some of the facts of the alleged PC doesn’t undermine it; it might be relevant at trial