E.D.Ky.: Disagreement with some of the facts of the alleged PC doesn’t undermine it; it might be relevant at trial

Defendant’s disagreement with some of the facts that led to his arrest didn’t undermine the probable cause and search incident. They may be relevant at trial, but probable cause still exists. United States v. Hawkins, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12033 (E.D. Ky. Jan. 25, 2019).*

Defendant failed to show any false statements, let alone material ones, in the affidavit for the search warrant. Thus, defense counsel couldn’t be ineffective. United States v. Carter, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11841 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.