NBC News: Police used Google location data to find an accused bank robber. He says that’s illegal.

NBC News: Police used Google location data to find an accused bank robber. He says that’s illegal. By Jon Schuppe (“The demand for Google data, known as a geofence warrant, is a way for law enforcement authorities to take advantage of the company’s collection of massive amounts of information on its customers. The orders allow police to track just about anyone using an Android device or a company app — such as Google maps or Gmail — to a particular place over a particular time period. As more police use such warrants, the method is raising concerns among privacy advocates, who say the government is gathering information from people in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which guards against unreasonable searches.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NBC News: Police used Google location data to find an accused bank robber. He says that’s illegal.

D.Ariz.: SW for law office was apparently one office with one entrance

HSI obtained a search warrant for the “law office of Marivel Cantu-Madril” which was in Suite D at the address, and her husband’s law office was in Suite E. The entrance to both offices was through the front door to E, and then through interior doors to D. Both were leased in both names. The search warrant for D once they got inside was particular enough. United States v. Cantu-Madril, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200370 (D. Ariz. Nov. 18, 2019).

Defendant’s pretext argument wasn’t presented to the trial court, so it’s waived on appeal. State v. Adams, 2019-Ohio-4762, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4817 (9th Dist. Nov. 20, 2019).*

Posted in Burden of pleading, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SW for law office was apparently one office with one entrance

D.Mont.: Being ordered from your vehicle doesn’t require a Miranda warning

Being ordered from your vehicle doesn’t require a Miranda warning. Mimms, of course, permits the occupants to be ordered out. Over time, this ripened to reasonable suspicion. United States v. Lugo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200612 (D. Mont. Nov. 19, 2019).

The officer’s request for consent during the basic parts of the traffic stop didn’t make it unreasonable. United States v. Calzadias, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200358 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2019).*

Defendant’s IP information was received via a county attorney subpoena, and then that information made it into a search warrant application. That was not unreasonable at all, and the good faith exception would apply in any event. United States v. Brown, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200378 (D.Neb. Oct. 29, 2019).*

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Being ordered from your vehicle doesn’t require a Miranda warning

WaPo: Police can keep Ring camera video forever and share with whomever they’d like, Amazon tells senator

WaPo: Police can keep Ring camera video forever and share with whomever they’d like, Amazon tells senator Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Police can keep Ring camera video forever and share with whomever they’d like, Amazon tells senator

D.N.M.: Brady material doesn’t have to be disclosed for suppression hearings

Brady material doesn’t have to be disclosed for suppression hearings. [How does this fit with the ethical obligation to not present false evidence? See Model Rules 3.3 & 3.4. Brady material might not make a difference in suppression hearing; then, again, it could make the government’s testimony false if the officer is not careful.] United States v. Deleon, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200039 (D. N.M. Nov. 19, 2019), adopted, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209550 (D.N.M. Dec. 5, 2019)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Brady material doesn’t have to be disclosed for suppression hearings

WaPo: ‘I got my rights to do anything I want to do’: Officer immediately fired after viral video shows him stopping black shoppers for ‘acting suspicious’ [Spending money while black]

WaPo: ‘I got my rights to do anything I want to do’: Officer immediately fired after viral video shows him stopping black shoppers for ‘acting suspicious’ by
Allyson Chiu

Posted in Police misconduct, Pretext | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘I got my rights to do anything I want to do’: Officer immediately fired after viral video shows him stopping black shoppers for ‘acting suspicious’ [Spending money while black]

OR: During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, state constitution prohibits asking for consent without justification

During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, the state constitution prohibits asking for consent without further justification. State v. Arreola-Botello, 365 Ore. 695, 2019 Ore. LEXIS 794 (Nov. 15, 2019), aff’g 292 Ore. App. 214, 418 P.3d 785 (2018) (per curiam):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, state constitution prohibits asking for consent without justification

Courthouse News: Judge Rules FBI Cannot Hide Use of Social Media Surveillance Tools

Courthouse News: Judge Rules FBI Cannot Hide Use of Social Media Surveillance Tools by Nicholas Iovino (“The FBI cannot hide whether it uses powerful surveillance tools to monitor the social-media activity of millions of Americans and noncitizens, a federal judge ruled Monday. U.S. District Judge Edward Chen rejected the government’s argument that acknowledging such surveillance capabilities, or the lack thereof, could reveal sensitive law enforcement techniques that would help criminals evade justice.”)

Posted in Social media warrants, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Courthouse News: Judge Rules FBI Cannot Hide Use of Social Media Surveillance Tools

NY4: Summary judgment on false arrest and excessive force claim without considering officers’ testimony in underlying criminal trial was error

Summary judgment against the defendants for false arrest and excessive force was improperly granted without considering the transcript of plaintiff’s criminal trial and the officers’ testimony there. Hernandez v Denny’s Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 08302, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8307 (4th Dept. Nov. 15, 2019).*

The stop was with probable cause or reasonable suspicion defendant had a headlight out. State v. Crites, 2019-Ohio-4729, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4804 (5th Dist. Nov. 14, 2019).*

Stop for cutting a corner through a convenience stop parking lot was valid. United States v. Hawkins, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199449 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 15, 2019).*

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Summary judgment on false arrest and excessive force claim without considering officers’ testimony in underlying criminal trial was error

WA: Affidavit and SW didn’t need to specify statutes of crimes under investigation when it was apparent it was murder

The search warrant of defendant’s place for trace evidence of a dead body rather than the body itself was reasonable because the police had information that the body had been burned in a fire pit. In addition, the affidavit and warrant did not specify the statutes under investigation, but the crime of murder was apparent. “Because a warrant for the search of real property authorizes a search of parts of the property and the fire pit was part of the property, the fire pit was included in the place to be searched and did not need to be separately designated. The warrant described the place to be searched with adequate particularity.” State v. Hatt, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 2893 (Nov. 18, 2019).

Hot pursuit justified entry into defendant’s property. He was a suspect in a bank robbery, and he was followed from the robbery scene by police car and a police helicopter to his home. Within two minutes, somebody was running from the home out the back door. They did not, however, enter the home until a search warrant was obtained. United States v. Wright, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199492 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2019).*

Posted in Curtilage, Hot pursuit, Particularity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WA: Affidavit and SW didn’t need to specify statutes of crimes under investigation when it was apparent it was murder

USA Today: Facial recognition: The fight over the use of our faces is far from over

USA Today: Facial recognition: The fight over the use of our faces is far from over by Terry Collins:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on USA Today: Facial recognition: The fight over the use of our faces is far from over

E.D.Tenn.: Facebook photo of def felon with a firearm apparently taken in a home justified a SW for his home

Defendant’s alleged threat on Facebook involving use of firearms, along with a picture of a firearm suggested it was in a home. The search warrant of defendant’s home was with probable cause. Defendant’s effort to “dissect” the affidavit paragraph by paragraph is contrary to the totality-of-circumstances which is the standard of review. Because this was a state search warrant, defendant argues that the state statute of what the weapon could be used for needed to be specified, but this is a possessory charge, and that’s all that needs to be shown which was readily apparent. United States v. Dunford, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199021 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 18, 2019).

No reasonable jury could conclude that the defendant school resource officer used excessive force in breaking up a fight and dealing with plaintiff’s disorderly conduct and resisting and dragging her to the office. Hines v. Jefferson, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 34238 (11th Cir. Nov. 18, 2019).*

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Facebook photo of def felon with a firearm apparently taken in a home justified a SW for his home

CA6: Informant’s reliability is the question, and that leads to finding of reliability of his or her hearsay

The CI’s first hand information isn’t constitutionally required for informant hearsay to be deemed credible. The question is the reliability of the informant, not so much the information which usually can’t all be pinned down anyway. United States v. Crawford, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 34218 (6th Cir. Nov. 18, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA6: Informant’s reliability is the question, and that leads to finding of reliability of his or her hearsay

techdirt: Supreme Court’s Warrant Requirement For Cell Site Location Info Apparently Killed Another Domestic Surveillance Program

techdirt: Supreme Court’s Warrant Requirement For Cell Site Location Info Apparently Killed Another Domestic Surveillance Program by Tim Cushing:
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, National security | Comments Off on techdirt: Supreme Court’s Warrant Requirement For Cell Site Location Info Apparently Killed Another Domestic Surveillance Program

Security Boulevard: Pew Survey: America Worries About Privacy (But Won’t Do Anything About It)

Security Boulevard: Pew Survey: America Worries About Privacy (But Won’t Do Anything About It) by Richi Jennings:
Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on Security Boulevard: Pew Survey: America Worries About Privacy (But Won’t Do Anything About It)

IL: Flagrantly unconstitutional arrest here means no attenuation for statement

Defendant’s arrest was flagrantly unconstitutional, and his statement wasn’t attenuated from it. People v. Gutierrez, 2019 IL App (3d) 180405, 2019 Ill. App. LEXIS 890 (Nov. 15, 2019).*

Defendant was convicted of possession of a weapon that was in his car under the passenger seat where there was a passenger. He was stopped for a traffic offense in front of his own house, and he was walking to the house when stopped. Nothing in the interaction would lead the police to believe that there was a weapon in the car or that a protective search was required. People v. Thomas, 2019 IL App (1st) 162791, 2019 Ill. App. LEXIS 889 (Nov. 15, 2019).*

Posted in Attenuation, Protective sweep | Comments Off on IL: Flagrantly unconstitutional arrest here means no attenuation for statement

WaPo: Fingerprints and face scans are the future of smartphones. These holdouts refuse to use them.

WaPo: Fingerprints and face scans are the future of smartphones. These holdouts refuse to use them. by Heather Kelly:
Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Fingerprints and face scans are the future of smartphones. These holdouts refuse to use them.

Fox News: Michigan county seized retiree’s home over $8 debt – now he’s fighting back in state’s top court

Fox News: Michigan county seized retiree’s home over $8 debt – now he’s fighting back in state’s top court by Andrew O’Reilly (“While Uri Rafaeli’s case, which is currently being decided in Michigan’s Supreme Court, is extreme, it is hardly unique as more than 100,000 homeowners in the state have fallen victim to an aggressive property tax statute that legislators in Lansing passed two decades ago.”)

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Fox News: Michigan county seized retiree’s home over $8 debt – now he’s fighting back in state’s top court

NYTimes: Ohio High School Plans to Drug-Test All Students at Least Once a Year

NYTimes: Ohio High School Plans to Drug-Test All Students at Least Once a Year by Derrick Bryson Taylor (“Research has shown that more than 37 percent of school districts have adopted drug-testing policies, but whether they lead to reduced rates of substance abuse is unclear, one expert said.”)

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on NYTimes: Ohio High School Plans to Drug-Test All Students at Least Once a Year

KY: “Plain smell” is longstanding, derives from plain view, and it won’t be reconsidered

The “plain smell” doctrine is longstanding, derives from plain view, and this court declines to resubmit the case for en banc review to reconsider it in the context of smell of marijuana in the car extending to the person in it. Mayfield v. Commonwealth, 2019 Ky. App. LEXIS 205 (Nov. 15, 2019).

Defendant’s claim that the trial court denied his motion to suppress in a Catch-22 [my words, not his] for not stating facts for relief without giving him access to the affidavit for the search warrant in the first place was affirmed per curiam. After denial of the motion, he entered a conditional plea to avoid a 30 year sentence. The concurring judge suggests he file under the court’s original jurisdiction to resolve the question. House v. State, 2019 Fla. App. LEXIS 17204 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 15, 2019).*

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on KY: “Plain smell” is longstanding, derives from plain view, and it won’t be reconsidered