Daily Archives: August 1, 2024

W.D.N.Y.: When police are told their arrestee isn’t in the house, they don’t have to believe it

When the police arrive for an arrest and the occupants say the guy they’re looking for isn’t there, police don’t have to credit that and just leave. Green-Page v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134563 (W.D.N.Y. July 30, 2024)* … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: When police are told their arrestee isn’t in the house, they don’t have to believe it

CA11: No standing in geofence warrant for girlfriend’s cell phone location

Defendant lacks standing to challenge a geofence warrant directed at his girlfriend’s cell phone. “Davis lacks Fourth Amendment standing to challenge the geofence warrant because the search did not disclose any information about the data on his own electronic device, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, geofence, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: No standing in geofence warrant for girlfriend’s cell phone location

D.Del.: Officer could open car door for officer safety to insure there was no one else inside

New arguments raised at the suppression hearing are considered waived. Even if it was considered, it lacks merit: The officer could open the car for a check for other passengers for officer safety. United States v. Hargraves, 2024 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Del.: Officer could open car door for officer safety to insure there was no one else inside

E.D.N.Y.: Showing nexus to a cell phone

Showing nexus in a search warrant affidavit between defendant’s cell phone and the crime. How much of the officer’s opinion matters? United States v. Santos, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133564 (E.D.N.Y. July 29, 2024):

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Showing nexus to a cell phone

D.Conn.: Pole camera of house not 4A violation

The use of a pole camera watching the front of defendant’s home for nearly three months was not an unreasonable search. Carpenter does lend some weight to his argument, but all Fourth Amendment precedent is against him. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Pole camera of house not 4A violation

NY Kings: Jurisdiction of the issuing magistrate didn’t matter here

“The fact that the warrant was signed by Justice Tully as an Acting Supreme Court Justice is irrelevant; Justice Tully was authorized to issue the search warrant regardless of whether she was sitting as a Criminal Court Judge or as … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Neutral and detached magistrate, Social media warrants | Comments Off on NY Kings: Jurisdiction of the issuing magistrate didn’t matter here