Daily Archives: August 31, 2024

D.Kan.: Reinstalling a deleted app to an iPhone to get to def’s account exceeded the scope of consent to search the phone

Defendant consented to a search of his iPhone, but here the officer reinstalled the Telegram app and then used it to search defendant’s Telegram account, finding child porn. All this exceeded his consent. There is no case in point because … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Scope of search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Reinstalling a deleted app to an iPhone to get to def’s account exceeded the scope of consent to search the phone

MO: Break in chain from Good Samaritan Law entry occurred when def was searched for transport in police car

The Missouri Good Samaritan Law provides immunity from prosecution from evidence of crime found as a result of a medically-related entry. Here, however, defendant was searched before he was placed in a patrol car, and immunity wasn’t what the legislature … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Break in chain from Good Samaritan Law entry occurred when def was searched for transport in police car

D.Minn.: Warrantless ion scan of car door handle was reasonable

A DNA ion scan of a car door handle was reasonable, relying on United States v. Jones, 2024 WL 1810220 (D. Minn. Apr. 25, 2024), finding no reasonable expectation of privacy in an ion scan on an apartment door from … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Warrantless ion scan of car door handle was reasonable

E.D.Tenn.: A lab report used to support PC doesn’t have to be included in the affidavit

“As to the omissions cited by defendant, the Court concludes that they do not detract from the probable cause analysis, as such elaborate specificity is not required. See Gates, 462 U.S. at 235 (explaining that search warrant affidavits ‘are normally … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: A lab report used to support PC doesn’t have to be included in the affidavit