Monthly Archives: August 2020

D.S.C.: Officers weren’t familiar with inventory policy and didn’t follow it; suppressed

There was an inventory policy, but the police were unfamiliar with it and didn’t follow it. “[T]he Court finds that the inventory search of Defendant’s vehicle by the Andrews Police Department was not conducted pursuant to any specific criteria, much … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Officers weren’t familiar with inventory policy and didn’t follow it; suppressed

KS: Inquiry to resolve an alleged emergency was reasonable, but extending detention to check warrants was unreasonable even under Strieff

Officers extending a safety check once the person was found to be fine just to see if there were warrants on the person went beyond the basis for the detention and was unreasonable. When the suspected emergency was resolved, the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on KS: Inquiry to resolve an alleged emergency was reasonable, but extending detention to check warrants was unreasonable even under Strieff

CA6: Handcuffing too tight overcame QI

Plaintiff stated a claim that overcame qualified immunity that she was handcuffed too tight causing injury. Ouza v. City of Dearborn Heights, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 24679 (6th Cir. Aug. 5, 2020).* 2255 petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim is barred by … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA6: Handcuffing too tight overcame QI

AK: Omission was maybe reckless but PC on the remainder

The officer’s omission of the CI’s criminal charges from the affidavit for the search warrant was reckless at worst, but the totality of the affidavit showed the CI’s potential motives for providing information. Moreover, there was probable cause even without … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on AK: Omission was maybe reckless but PC on the remainder

D.Mont.: Officer had something at least close to RS to investigate def as a probation violator and there was no bad faith or flagrantly unreasonable action

If the officer didn’t have reasonable suspicion defendant was a probation violator, he had something really close to it. Also, nothing about the officer’s investigation was flagrant or in bad faith. United States v. Galliher, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140901 … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Officer had something at least close to RS to investigate def as a probation violator and there was no bad faith or flagrantly unreasonable action

CA11: Duplex driveway here wasn’t curtilage

The district court did not err in finding defendant’s driveway of a duplex was not curtilage under the Dunn factors in light of Collins. United States v. Stephen, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 24803 (11th Cir. Aug. 6, 2020):

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on CA11: Duplex driveway here wasn’t curtilage

CA8: Ptf’s takedown was reasonable for his not responding to commands

Plaintiff was taken down because he didn’t properly respond to commands, and he suffered facial injuries. He was, however, so intoxicated and couldn’t remember what happened. He was also Tased. It was all reasonable based on what the officer was … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Ptf’s takedown was reasonable for his not responding to commands

Massachusetts holds long term pole camera surveillance of one’s home can violate REP and state constitution

Long term surveillance of defendant’s homes with pole cameras wasn’t a Fourth Amendment violation but it could violate the Massachusetts Constitution. Two defendants show a reasonable expectation of privacy under a “mosaic theory” which has been recognized in Massachusetts. Remanded … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, State constitution | Comments Off on Massachusetts holds long term pole camera surveillance of one’s home can violate REP and state constitution

CA10: Parolee’s § 1983 claim he was wrongfully arrested on parole doesn’t state a claim because he’s always “in custody”

Plaintiff’s claim that he was unreasonably arrested for a parole violation before actually getting on parole is rejected because a parolee is still in custody no matter what. “Similarly, there is no authority to support Mr. Neilsen’s argument that an … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA10: Parolee’s § 1983 claim he was wrongfully arrested on parole doesn’t state a claim because he’s always “in custody”

D.Mass.: Six week delay between PC of one drug possession made SW stale; no GFE here

The six week delay between the probable cause and the issuance of the search warrant for one drug possession was stale, and no reasonable officer could have concluded there was. Therefore, the good faith exception doesn’t apply. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Six week delay between PC of one drug possession made SW stale; no GFE here

HPPR: Class Action Suit Over Recorded Calls At Leavenworth Prison Settles For $3.7 Million

HPPR: Class Action Suit Over Recorded Calls At Leavenworth Prison Settles For $3.7 Million by Dan Margolies:

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on HPPR: Class Action Suit Over Recorded Calls At Leavenworth Prison Settles For $3.7 Million

NM: Calls to murder victim’s cell phone just before murder was PC to get CSLI on the phone

A shooting victim made and received cell phone calls to his phone and the calls were not in the contacts list 30 minutes before the victim was found dead. This was probable cause for data about that caller including the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Inventory | Comments Off on NM: Calls to murder victim’s cell phone just before murder was PC to get CSLI on the phone

S.D.Miss.: QI has to be applied but it should be overruled (updated)

Plaintiff’s claim that he was wrongfully stopped and searched, finding nothing, and had his newly acquired car torn apart on the side of the road still led to the officer getting qualified immunity. This case is an historical and practical … Continue reading

Posted in Police misconduct, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: QI has to be applied but it should be overruled (updated)

TX14: There has to be a fact dispute to get an art. 38.23(a) jury instruction on legality of search

“‘To raise a disputed fact issue warranting an article 38.23(a) jury instruction, there must be some affirmative evidence that puts the existence of that fact into question.’ Madden, 242 S.W.3d at 513. In other words, a cross examiner cannot create … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on TX14: There has to be a fact dispute to get an art. 38.23(a) jury instruction on legality of search

Reason: Grand Jury Indictments Paint a Picture of Deadly Deceit in Houston Narcotics Division

Reason: Grand Jury Indictments Paint a Picture of Deadly Deceit in Houston Narcotics Division by Jacob Sullum (“The charges, which grew out of a lethal 2019 raid based on a fraudulent search warrant affidavit, suggest that cops routinely built their … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Reason: Grand Jury Indictments Paint a Picture of Deadly Deceit in Houston Narcotics Division

CA1: Inventory was shown to be investigative; suppression affirmed

“All in all, it seems inescapable that the officers seized Del Rosario’s car so that they could search it for evidence of a crime, and that they later sought to justify the search by invoking the community-caretaking exception. And while … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on CA1: Inventory was shown to be investigative; suppression affirmed

W.D.N.Y.: USMJ’s credibility determination is entitled to deference

While review of the R&R is de novo, the USMJ’s credibility determination on a motion to suppress is still entitled to deference. United States v. Angulo-Gomez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137199 (W.D. N.Y. Aug. 3, 2020). The government argued that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: USMJ’s credibility determination is entitled to deference

D.Nev.: Denial of medical care after arrest can be a 4A violation, but this doesn’t measure up

“To the extent Plaintiff is asserting a denial of medical care after his arrest, but before he arrived at the detention facility, district courts within the Ninth Circuit have held that law enforcement officers are required to provide objectively reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Denial of medical care after arrest can be a 4A violation, but this doesn’t measure up

CA3: Suspended DL arrest was valid despite fact it was later dismissed in state court

Defendant’s arrest for driving on a suspended license was valid and with probable cause despite the fact he later got the charge dismissed. Bahgat v. Twp. of E. Brunswick, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 24326 (3d Cir. Aug. 3, 2020). Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Suspended DL arrest was valid despite fact it was later dismissed in state court

OH3: Collins v. Virginia not retroactive on post-conviction relief

Defendant’s claim that Collins v. Virginia applied on post-conviction is denied. The search was two years before Collins was decided, and trial and appeal were over by then. It isn’t retroactive to final cases. State v. Parsons, 2020-Ohio-3917, 2020 Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH3: Collins v. Virginia not retroactive on post-conviction relief