Monthly Archives: July 2020

E.D.Ky.: SW can compel persons present at time of seizure of cellphone to provide biometrics to unlock it on mere RS; PC not required

“Modern day biometric authentication features for electronic devices allow once trivial gestures, such as a momentary stare or touch, to be the barrier between the outside world and an individual’s most intimate, private details. The United States has applied for … Continue reading

Posted in Biometrics, Cell phones, Overbreadth | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: SW can compel persons present at time of seizure of cellphone to provide biometrics to unlock it on mere RS; PC not required

AK: Misspelling of target name in a warrant to record a conversation didn’t void the warrant when right person was recorded

Officers obtained a warrant under state law to record a future conversation with defendant about his alleged sexual assault of a passed out woman, but they didn’t have the spelling right (Darren, not Darin) and a wrong middle initial. There … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on AK: Misspelling of target name in a warrant to record a conversation didn’t void the warrant when right person was recorded

OR: Disclaiming ownership of purse brought to police station police wanted to search wasn’t abandonment

Where defendant was told to bring her purse and later disclaimed ownership when the officer wanted to search it, she did not abandon it to the degree she lost ownership or a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. It wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on OR: Disclaiming ownership of purse brought to police station police wanted to search wasn’t abandonment

OR: Parents’ consent to taking DNA from juvenile wasn’t valid

A juvenile accused of a sex offense also has to consent with his parents to taking a DNA swab. The parent’s consent alone is not enough. In re H. K. D. S., 305 Ore. App. 86, 2020 Ore. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, DNA | Comments Off on OR: Parents’ consent to taking DNA from juvenile wasn’t valid

D.Del.: Mere denials of the facts doesn’t make a Franks claim

Just saying in a motion to suppress the defendant “‘denies telling law enforcement that additional drugs could be found within his apartment’ and ‘disputes the accuracy’ of the statement that officers detected the odor of burnt marijuana in the apartment” … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Del.: Mere denials of the facts doesn’t make a Franks claim

CA6: Filing a case report with the DA doesn’t make a malicious prosecution action

“Cases after Skousen have continued to apply its holding that filing a case report, taken alone, is insufficient to support a malicious-prosecution claim. See Miller v. Davis, 653 F. App’x 448, 455-56 (6th Cir. 2016) (holding that a detective’s report … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA6: Filing a case report with the DA doesn’t make a malicious prosecution action

TX: Perjured police testimony in drug raid leads to finding of actual innocence

Petitioner showed actual innocence to get his drug conviction set aside. The Houston officer involved was shown to be a perjurer in drug case search warrant requests and trial testimony. That led to two deaths during a botched no-knock drug … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on TX: Perjured police testimony in drug raid leads to finding of actual innocence

MD & NY2: Court ordered GPS tracking satisfied warrant requirement

Court ordered GPS tracking of a vehicle for up to 30 days under state statute satisfied the warrant requirement for its showing of probable cause before a neutral and detached magistrate. Whittington v. State, 2020 Md. App. LEXIS 621 (July … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MD & NY2: Court ordered GPS tracking satisfied warrant requirement

CA5: Reasonable mistaken identification made stop reasonable

“In any event, even if it is assumed arguendo that an attempted seizure could in fact trigger the Fourth Amendment, Ferguson has failed to show that the attempt to detain him for an investigatory Terry stop was not supported by … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Reasonable mistaken identification made stop reasonable

WaPo: California begins enforcing digital privacy law, despite calls for delay

WaPo: California begins enforcing digital privacy law, despite calls for delay by Rachel Lerman (“California’s privacy law, often called the broadest law for digital privacy in the United States, can finally be enforced starting Wednesday. And despite industry calls for … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy, Informational privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: California begins enforcing digital privacy law, despite calls for delay

NY Times: How Infrared Images Could Be Part of Your Daily Life

NY Times: How Infrared Images Could Be Part of Your Daily Life by Jonah M. Kessel (“In a post-quarantine world, heat sensors could help spot sick people with elevated temperatures as they enter public places. But it’s not that simple.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NY Times: How Infrared Images Could Be Part of Your Daily Life

CA5: Bitcoin transactions are like third-party bank records with no REP

Bitcoin transactions are akin to third-party bank records and are not governed by Carpenter. There is no added reasonable expectation of privacy in them. United States v. Gratkowski, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 20501 (5th Cir. June 30, 2020). The vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA5: Bitcoin transactions are like third-party bank records with no REP

WA: Private party returning property to def’s house per request was private searcher

The observations of a private person returning something to defendant’s dwelling for him were a private search. The police had nothing to do with it. State v. Lake, 2020 Wash. App. LEXIS 1925 (June 30, 2020).* Reasonable jurists would not … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Drug or alcohol testing, Private search | Comments Off on WA: Private party returning property to def’s house per request was private searcher

CA6: When target of an IRS summons is named, it’s not a “John Doe summons”

“There is no shortage of reasons to reject Byers’s argument. But her argument, we acknowledge, has intuitive appeal—‘Shouldn’t the government have to give a reason why it wants my information?’—and merits this fulsome response. In all, Byers has raised a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA6: When target of an IRS summons is named, it’s not a “John Doe summons”

CA7: On the totality, RS was thin, up until def fled

“If these were all the facts, establishing reasonable suspicion might have been a close call for the officers. But Wilson’s unprovoked, headlong flight from police in a high-crime area put any lingering doubt to rest. Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: On the totality, RS was thin, up until def fled

OH9: State argued RS but didn’t come forward with proof of it

The state argued there were factors supporting reasonable suspicion, but they didn’t come forward with it. Order granting motion to suppress affirmed. State v. Thomas, 2020-Ohio-3539, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2453 (9th Dist. June 30, 2020). The search warrant was … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH9: State argued RS but didn’t come forward with proof of it